Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-mm7gn Total loading time: 0.319 Render date: 2022-08-08T03:54:51.449Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Factors influencing hydroids (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa) biodiversity and distribution in Arctic kelp forest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2008

Marta Ronowicz*
Affiliation:
Institute of Oceanology, Polish Academy of Sciences ul. Powstancow Warszawy 55, Sopot 81-712, Poland
Maria Wlodarska-Kowalczuk
Affiliation:
Institute of Oceanology, Polish Academy of Sciences ul. Powstancow Warszawy 55, Sopot 81-712, Poland
Piotr Kuklinski
Affiliation:
Institute of Oceanology, Polish Academy of Sciences ul. Powstancow Warszawy 55, Sopot 81-712, Poland
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Marta Ronowicz, Institute of Oceanology, Polish Academy of Sciences ul. Powstancow Warszawy 55, Sopot 81-712, Poland email: martigor1@o2.pl

Abstract

The biodiversity and distribution patterns of epiphytic hydroids were studied in kelp forests (composed of Laminaria digitata, Saccharina latissima and Alaria esculenta) located in an Arctic glaciated fiord (Hornsund, west Spitsbergen). In total, twenty-eight species were found colonizing algae, stones connected to holdfast, and overgrowing the surface of other animals associated with kelps. The characteristics of the algal host (e.g. algae species, age, rhizoid volume or biomass) did not show any effect upon hydroid species richness or species composition. High hydroid biodiversity was strongly dependent on microsubstrate heterogeneity. The highest biodiversity as well as frequency of hydroid occurrence were noted at a site located furthest from the glacier and characterized by the lowest sediment concentration and sedimentation rate. Sexual reproduction also seemed to be inhibited by glacier-derived disturbance. Of ten fertile species found at the ‘clearest’ site only two were fertile at sites under the strong influence of such perturbations. Potential physical drivers of species occurrence were linked to the activity of tidal glaciers, particularly to high loads of mineral sedimentation and iceberg scouring.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abele, L.G. (1974) Species diversity of decapod crustaceans in marine habitats. Ecology 55, 156161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Airoldi, L. (2003) The effect of sedimentation on rocky coast assemblages. Oceanography and Marine Biology. Annual Review 41, 161236.Google Scholar
Anderson, M.J., Diebel, C.E., Blom, W.M. and Landers, T.J. (2005) Consistency and variation in kelp holdfast assemblages: spatial patterns of biodiversity for the major phyla at different taxonomic resolutions. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 320, 3556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, D.K.A. and Kuklinski, P. (2003) High polar spatial competition: extreme hierarchies at extreme latitude. Marine Ecology Progress Series 259, 1728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsen, B.P., Johnsen, G., Berge, J. and Kuklinski, P. (2007) Biodiversity patterns of macro-epifauna on different lamina parts of Laminaria digitata and Saccharina latissima collected during spring and summer 2004 in Kongsfjorden, Svalbard. Polar Biology 30, 939943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelius, P.F.S. (1995a) North-west European thecate hydroids and their medusae. Part 1. Synopses of the British Fauna (New Series) 50, 1347.Google Scholar
Cornelius, P.F.S. (1995b) North-west European thecate hydroids and their medusae. Part 2. Synopses of the British Fauna (New Series) 50, 1347.Google Scholar
Faucci, A. and Boero, F. (2000) Structure of an epiphytic hydroid community on Cystoseira at two sites of different wave exposure. Scientia Marina 64, 255264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrell, D.L. (2004) Fitness consequences of allorecognition-mediated agonistic interactions in the colonial hydroid Hydractinia [GM]. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole 206, 173187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraschetti, S., Giangrande, A., Terlizzi, A., Miglietta, M.P., DellaTommasa, L. and Boero, F. (2002) Spatio-temporal variation of hydroids and polychaetes associated with Cystoseira amentacea (Fucales: Phaeophyceae). Marine Biology 140, 949957.Google Scholar
Fraschetti, S., Terlizzi, A., Bevilacqua, S. and Boero, F. (2006) The distribution of hydroids (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) from micro- to macro-scale: spatial patterns on habitat-forming algae. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 339, 148158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Görlich, K., Weslawski, J.M. and Zajaczkowski, M. (1987) Suspension settling effect on macrobenthos biomass distribution in the Hornsund fjord, Spitsbergen. Polar Research 5, 175192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, J. and Haugen, I. (1989) Some observations of intertidal communities on Spitsbergen (79°N), Norwegian Arctic. Polar Research 7, 2327.Google Scholar
Hayward, P.J. (1980) Invertebrate epiphytes of coastal marine algae. In Price, J.H et al. (eds) The shore environment, 2: ecosystems. London and New York: Academic Press, pp. 761787.Google Scholar
Hughes, R.G., Johnson, S. and Smith, I.D. (1991) The growth patterns of some hydroids that are obligate epiphytes of seagrass leaves. Hydrobiologia 216/217, 205210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irving, A.D. and Connel, S.D. (2002) Sedimentation and light penetration interact to maintain heterogeneity of subtidal habitats: algal versus invertebrate dominated assemblages. Marine Ecology Progress Series 245, 8391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kain, J.M. (1963) Aspects of the biology of Laminaria hyperborea. II. Age, weight and length. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 43, 129151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuklinski, P. and Bader, B. (2007) Diversity, structure and interactions of encrusting lithophyllic macrofaunal assemblages from Belgica Bank, East Greenland. Polar Biology 30, 709717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuklinski, P., Gulliksen, B., Lønne, O.J. and Weslawski, J.M. (2006) Substratum as a structuring influence on assemblages of Arctic bryozoans. Polar Biology 29, 652661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippert, H., Iken, K., Rachor, E. and Wiencke, C. (2001) Macrofauna associated with macroalgae in the Kongsfjord (Spitsbergen). Polar Biology 24, 512522.Google Scholar
Llobet, I., Gili, J.M. and Hughes, R.G. (1991) Horizontal, vertical and seasonal distributions of epiphytic hydrozoa on the alga Halimeda tuna in the Northwestern Mediterranean Sea. Marine Biology 110, 151159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeng, H. (1991) Features of the physical oceanographic conditions of the Barents Sea. In Proceedings of the Pro Mare Symposium on Polar Marine Ecology, Trondheim, 12–16 May 1990. Polar Research 10, 518.Google Scholar
Martin-Smith, K.M. (1993) Abundance of mobile epifauna: the role of habitat complexity and predation by fishes. Journal of the Experimental Biology and Ecology 174, 243260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, P.G. (1977) Inorganic particulate suspensions in the sea and their effects on marine animals. Oceanography and Marine Biology. Annual Review 15, 225363.Google Scholar
Nishihira, M. (1965) The association between Hydrozoa and their attachment substrata with special reference to algal substrata. Bulletin of the Marine Biological Station of Asamushi 12, 7592.Google Scholar
Palerud, R., Gulliksen, B., Brattegard, T., Sneli, J.-A. and Vader, W. (2004) The marine macro-organisms in Svalbard waters. In Prestrud, P. et al. (eds) A catalogue of the terrestrial and marine animals of Svalbard. Tromsø: Norwegian Polar Institute, pp. 556.Google Scholar
Piraino, S. (1991) The adaptive pattern of growth and reproduction of the colonial hydroid Clavopsella michaeli. Hydrobiologia 216/217, 229234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronowicz, M. (2005) Species diversity of Arctic gravel beach: case study for species poor habitats. Polish Polar Research 26, 287297.Google Scholar
Ronowicz, M. (2007) Benthic hydroids (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa) from Svalbard waters—biodiversity and distribution. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 87, 10891094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronowicz, M. and Schuchert, P. (2007) Halecium arcticum, a new hydroid from Spitsbergen (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa). Zootaxa 1549, 5562.Google Scholar
Różycki, O. and Gruszczyński, M. (1986) Macrofauna associated with laminarians in the coastal waters of West Spitsbergen. Polish Polar Research 7, 337351.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A.L. and Scheibling, R.E. (2006) A comparison of epifauna and epiphytes on native kelps (Laminaria species) and an invasive alga (Codium fragile ssp. tomentosoides) in Nova Scotia, Canada. Botanica Marina 49, 315330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuchert, P. (2001) Survey of the family Corynidae (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa). Revue Suisse de Zoologie 108, 739878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultze, K., Janke, K., Krüß, A. and Weidemann, W. (1990) The macrofauna and macroflora associated with Laminaria digitata and L. hyperborea at the island of Helgoland (German Bight, North Sea). Helgoländer Meeresunters 44, 3951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, F. and Witman, J.D. (1999) Species diversity in subtidal landscapes: maintenance by physical processes and larval recruitment. Ecology 80, 5169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stebbing, A.R.D. (1980) Increase in gonozooids frequency as an adaptive response to stress in Campanularia flexuosa. In Tardent, P. and Tardent, R. (eds) Proceedings of the 4th International Coelenterate Conference held in Interlaken, Switzerland, 4–8 September, 1979. Developmental and Cellular Biology of Coelenterates. Amsterdam and other cities: Elsevier: North-Holland Biomedical Press, pp. 2732.Google Scholar
Svendsen, J.I., Elverhoi, A. and Mangerud, J. (1996) The retreat of the Barents Sea ice sheet on the western Svalbard margin. Boreas 25, 244256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swerpel, S. (1985) The Hornsund Fjord: water masses. Polish Polar Research 6, 475496.Google Scholar
Wahl, M. (1989) Marine epibiosis. I. Fouling and antifouling: some basic aspects. Marine Ecology Progress Series 58, 175189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, J.E. (1992) The hydroid community of Amphibolis seagrasses in south-eastern and south-western Australia. Scientia Marina 56, 217227.Google Scholar
Wȩsławski, J.M., Koszteyn, J., Zajączkowski, M., Wiktor, J. and Kwaśniewski, S. (1995) Fresh water in Svalbard fjord ecosystems. In Skjodal, H.R. et al. (eds) Ecology of fjords and coastal waters. Amsterdam: Elsevier Sci BV, pp. 229241.Google Scholar
Wiencke, C., Clayton, M.N., Gómez, I., Iken, K., Lüder, U.H., Amsler, C.D., Karsten, U., Hanelt, D., Bischof, K. and Dunton, K. (2007) Life strategy, ecophysiology and ecology of seaweeds in polar waters. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology 6, 95126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wlodarska-Kowalczuk, M. and Kedra, M. (2007) Surrogacy in natural patterns of benthic distribution and diversity: selected taxa versus lower taxonomic resolution. Marine Ecology Progress Series 351, 5363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wlodarska-Kowalczuk, M. and Weslawski, J.M. (2001) Impact of climate warming on Arctic benthic biodiversity: a case study of two Arctic glacial bays. Climate Research 18, 127132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Factors influencing hydroids (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa) biodiversity and distribution in Arctic kelp forest
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Factors influencing hydroids (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa) biodiversity and distribution in Arctic kelp forest
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Factors influencing hydroids (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa) biodiversity and distribution in Arctic kelp forest
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *