Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-09T12:33:14.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of enumeration time periods on detecting community parameters of periphytic diatoms using an artificial substratum in coastal waters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2013

Yuanyuan Liu ,
Wei Zhang  and
Henglong Xu
Yuanyuan Liu
Affiliation:
Institute of Evolution and Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China
Wei Zhang
Affiliation:
Institute of Evolution and Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China
Henglong Xu*
Affiliation:
Institute of Evolution and Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: H. Xu, Institute of Evolution and Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China email: henglongxu@126.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Community parameters of diatoms have been used as useful bioindicators for bioassessment of both lentic and lotic systems. The influence of enumeration time periods on detecting community parameters of periphytic diatom assemblages within different exposure times was studied using an artificial substratum in coastal waters of the Yellow Sea, northern China, during the period May–June 2010. Samples were collected at a depth of 1 m, and were examined with different enumeration time periods. Enumeration time periods represented a significant influence on detecting the community features of periphytic diatoms, although no significant changes occurred in periphytic diatom community structure between two enumeration schemes (within 24 h and 24–48 h). The delayed enumeration (within 24–48 h) may result in the similarity of the communities being reduced 10–29%, and in species numbers decreasing and in abundance increasing with exposure duration, respectively. The diversity (richness, evenness and diversity of species) indices were significantly decreased in almost all samples with >10% standard errors at some exposure times by the delayed enumeration scheme. These results suggest that the delayed enumeration may have resulted in the species richness and individual abundance of periphytic diatoms significantly decreasing and increasing, respectively, and thus significantly affected the analyses of species diversity for assessing water quality in marine ecosystems.

Keywords

artificial substratumenumeration periodmarine bioassessmentperiphytic diatom
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 93 , Issue 8 , December 2013 , pp. 2067 - 2073
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Almeida, S.F.P. (2001) Use of diatoms for freshwater quality evaluation in Portugal. Limnetica 20, 205–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amann, R.I., Ludwig, W. and Schleifer, K.H. (1995) Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiological Reviews 59, 143–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Besse-Lototskaya, A., Verdonschot, P.F.M. and Sinkeldam, J.A. (2006) Uncertainty in diatom assessment: sampling, identification and counting variation. Hydrobiologia 566, 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanco, S. and Bécares, E. (2010) Are biotic indices sensitive to river toxicants? A comparison of metrics based on diatoms and macro-invertebrates. Chemosphere 79, 18–25.Google Scholar
Clarke, K.R. and Gorley, R.N. (2006) PRIME-E. User manual/tutorial. Plymouth: PRIMER-E-Ltd.Google Scholar
D'Costa, P.M. and Anil, A.C. (2010) Diatom community dynamics in a tropical, monsoon-influenced environment: west coast of India. Continental Shelf Research 30, 1324–1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debenest, T., Pinelli, E., Coste, M., Silvestre, J., Mazzella, N., Madigou, C. and Delmas, F. (2009) Sensitivity of freshwater periphytic diatoms to agricultural herbicides. Aquatic Toxicology 93, 11–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dorigo, U., Bérard, A., Bouchez, A., Rimet, F. and Montuelle, B. (2010) Transplantation of microbenthic algal assemblages to assess structural and functional recovery after diuron exposure. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 59, 555–563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dorigo, U., Lefranc, M., Leboulanger, C., Montuelle, B. and Humbert, J.F. (2009) Spatial heterogeneity of periphytic microbial communities in a small pesticide-polluted river. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 67, 491–501.Google Scholar
Duong, T.T., Feurtet-Mazel, A., Coste, M., Dang, D.K. and Boudou, A. (2007) Dynamics of diatom colonization process in some rivers influenced by urban pollution (Hanoi, Vietnam). Ecological Indicators 7, 839–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duong, T.T., Morin, S., Coste, M., Herlory, O., Feurtet-Mazel, A. and Boudou, A. (2010) Experimental toxicity and bioaccumulation of cadmium in freshwater periphytic diatoms in relation with biofilm maturity. Science of the Total Environment 408, 552–562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gold, C., Feurtet-Mazel, A., Coste, M. and Boudou, A. (2002) Field transfer of periphytic diatom communities to assess short-term structural effects of metals (Cd, Zn) in rivers. Water Research 36, 3654–3664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hameed, H.A. (2003) The colonization of periphytic diatom species on artificial substrates in the Ashar canal, Basrah, Iraq. Limnologica — Ecology and Management of Inland Waters 33, 54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasle, G.R. and Syvertsen, E.E. (1997) Marine diatoms. In Tomas, C.R. (ed.) Identifying marine phytoplankton. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 5–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ismael, A.A. and Dorgham, M.M. (2003) Ecological indices as a tool for assessing pollution in El-Dekhaila Harbour (Alexandria, Egypt). Oceanologia 45, 121–131.Google Scholar
Khatoon, H., Yusoff, F.M., Banerjee, S., Shariff, M. and Mohamed, S. (2007) Use of periphytic cyanobacterium and mixed diatoms coated substrate for improving water quality, survival and growth of Penaeus monodon Fabricius postlarvae. Aquaculture 271, 196–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kireta, A.R., Reavie, E.D., Sgro, G.V., Angradi, T.R., Bolgrien, D.W., Hill, B.H. and Jicha, T.M. (2012) Planktonic and periphytic diatoms as indicators of stress on great rivers of the United States: testing water quality and disturbance models. Ecological Indicators 13, 222–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange-Bertalot, H. (1979) Pollution tolerance of diatoms as a criterion for water quality estimation. Nova Hedwigia 64, 285–304.Google Scholar
Lei, A., Lam, K.P. and Hu, Z. (2011) Comparison of two sampling methods when studying periphyton colonization in Lam Tsuen River, Hong Kong, China. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology 29, 141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morin, S., Duong, T.T., Dabrin, A., Coynel, A., Herlory, O., Baudrimont, M., Delmas, F., Durrieu, G., Schäfer, J., Winterton, P., Blanc, G. and Coste, M. (2008) Long-term survey of heavy-metal pollution, biofilm contamination and diatom community structure in the Riou Mort watershed, South-West France. Environmental Pollution 151, 532–542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nayar, S., Goh, B.P.L. and Chou, L.M. (2005) Settlement of marine periphytic algae in a tropical estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 64, 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oemke, M.P. and Burton, T.M. (1986) Diatom colonization dynamics in a lotic system. Hydrobiologia 139, 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strüder-Kypke, M.C. (1999) Periphyton and sphagnicolous protists of dystrophic bog lakes (Brandenburg, Germany). I. Annual cycles, distribution and comparison to other lakes. Limnologica 29, 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J.C., Prygiel, J., Vosloo, A., Rey, P.A. and Rensburg, L. (2007) Can diatom-based pollution indices be used for biomonitoring in South Africa? A case study of the Crocodile West and Marico water management area. Hydrobiologia 592, 455–464.Google Scholar
Xu, H., Zhang, W., Jiang, Y., Zhu, M. and Al-Rasheid, K.A.S. (2012) Influence of sampling sufficiency on biodiversity analysis of microperiphyton communities for marine bioassessment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 19, 540–549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, W., Xu, H., Jiang, Y., Zhu, M. and Al-Resheid, K.A.S. (2012a) Influence of enumeration time periods on analysing colonization features and taxonomic relatedness of periphytic ciliate communities using an artificial substratum for marine bioassessment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 19, 3619–3627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, W., Xu, H., Jiang, Y., Zhu, M. and Al-Resheid, K.A.S. (2012b) Colonization dynamics in trophic–functional structure of periphytic protist communities in coastal waters. Marine Biology 159, 735–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar