Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-65tv2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-07T15:59:15.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The meiofauna of a flatfish nursery ground

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

A. D. McIntyre  and
D. J. Murison
A. D. McIntyre
Affiliation:
Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen
D. J. Murison
Affiliation:
Marine Laboratory, Aberdeen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The meiofauna was studied over a 10-year period on a flatfish nursery ground between the high-water mark and a depth of 10 m below low-water springs.

The sediment was well sorted sand, with median diameter from 210 to 279 μ in the intertidal area and 160 to 208 μ in the subtidal. It was composed of medium rounded quartz, with the calcium carbonate content mainly 0·25 to 2·20% by weight. Porosity was 33·39% and the coefficient of permeability ranged from 1·66 to 2·33 × 10–2 cm per sec, indicating good drainage. The sand was usually over 90% water-saturated, and seldom less than 60%. The annual average concentration of particulate organic carbonwas 205 μg/g sand in the intertidal, and 684 μg/g at 5 m depth. Corresponding values for chlorophyll a were 0·75 and 4·50 μg/g.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , February 1973 , pp. 93 - 118
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCE

Barnett, P. R. O., 1968. Distribution and ecology of harpacticoid copepods of an intertidal mudflat. Internationale Revue der gesamten Hydrobiologie und Hydrographie, 53, 177–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capstick, C. K., 1959. The distribution of free-living nematodes in relation to salinity in the middle and upper reaches of the river Blyth estuary. Journal of Animal Ecology, London, 28, 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenchel, T. M. & Riedl, R. J., 1970. The sulphide system: a new biotic community underneath the oxidized layer of marine sand bottoms. Marine Biology, 7, 255–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. S., 1972. The effects of pollution on sand meiofauna communities. Proc. 6th European Symposium on Marine Biology. Thalassia (in the Press).Google Scholar
Gray, J. S. & Rieger, R. M., 1971. A quantitative study of the meiofauna of an exposed sandy beach, at Robin Hood's Bay, Yorkshire. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 51, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R. P., 1972 a. The distribution and ecology of the interstitial meiofauna of a sandy beach at Whitsand Bay, East Cornwall. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 52, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R. P., 1972 b. Horizontal and vertical distribution of the interstitial harpacticoid copepods of a sandy beach. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 52, 375–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R. P., 1972 c. Seasonal changes in the meiofauna population of an intertidal sandy beach. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 52, 389–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, R. P., 1972 d. Reproductive activity of the interstitial copepods of a sandy beach. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 52, 507–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khailov, K. M. & Burlakova, Z. P., 1968. The dynamics of organic matter release in some marine organisms. Biologiya Morya, 15, 207–18. [Report of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Translation Series no. 1220.]Google Scholar
Lasker, R., Wells, J. B. J. & McIntyre, A. D., 1970. Growth, reproduction, respiration and carbon utilisation of the sand-dwelling harpacticoid copepod, Asellopsis intermedia. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, A. D., 1970. The range of biomass in intertidal sand, with special reference to the bivalve Tellina tenuis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 561–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, A. D., 1972. Control factors on meiofauna populations. Proc. 6th European Symposium on Marine Biology. Thalassia (in the Press).Google Scholar
McIntyre, A. D. & Eleftheriou, A., 1968. The bottom fauna of a flatfish nursery ground. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 48, 113–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, A. D., Munro, A. L. S. & Steele, J. H., 1970. Energy flow in a sand ecosystem. In Marine Food Chains (ed. Steele, J. H.), pp. 19–31. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Mare, M. F., 1942. A study of a marine benthic community with special reference to the microorganisms. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 25, 517–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muus, B. J., 1967. The fauna of Danish estuaries and lagoons. Meddelelser fra Danmarks Fiskeri-og Havunders-gelser. Kobenhavn, 5, 1–316.Google Scholar
Perkins, E. J., 1958 a. Microbenthos of the shore at Whitstable, Kent. Nature, London, 181, p. 791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, E. J., 1958 b. Food relationships of the microbenthos, with particular reference to that found at Whitstable, Kent. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Ser. 13, 1, 64–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, L. W., 1971. On some British marine Tardigrada, including two new species of Batillipes. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 51, 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renaud-Debyser, J. & Salvat, B., 1963. Eléménts de prospérité des biotopes des sédiments meubles intertidaux et écologie de leurs populations en microfaune et macrofaune. Vie et Milieu, 14, 463–550.Google Scholar
Russell, R. D. & Taylor, R. E., 1937. Roundness and shape of Mississippi river sands. Journal of Geology, 45, 225–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, P., 1968. Die quantitative Verteilung und Populationsdynamik des Mesopsammons am Gezeiten–Sandstrand der Nordseeinsel Sylt. I. Faktorengefuge und biologische Gliederung des Lebensraumes. International Revue der gesamter Hydrobiologie und Hydrographie, 53, 723–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, J. H. & Baird, I. E., 1968. Production ecology of a sandy beach. Liminology and Oceanography, 13, 14–25.Google Scholar
Steele, J. H., Munro, A. L. S. & Giese, G. S., 1970. Environmental factors controlling the epipsammic flora on beach and sublittoral sands. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 907–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thane-Fenchel, A., 1970. Interstitial gastrotrichs of some South Florida beaches. Ophelia, 7, 113–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, R. M., 1971. Nematode associations in the Exe estuary. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 51, 439–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, R. M. & Buchanan, J. B., 1970. The meiofauna off the coast of Northumberland. I. The structure of the nematode population. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 129–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, R. M. & Platt, H. M., 1972. New and little known marine nematodes from a Scottish sandy beach. Cahiers de Biologie Marine, Roscoff (in the Press).Google Scholar