Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T02:30:23.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Abnormal Conditions of the Gills in Mytilus edulis. Part I. On Permanent Natural Reversal of the Frontal Cilia on the Gill Filaments of Mytilus edulis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2009

D. Atkins
Affiliation:
Amy, Lady Tate Scholar of Bedford College.

Extract

A Heavy percentage of the mussels obtained from various parts of the Fal Estuary, during October and November, 1927, had the gills in an exceedingly abnormal condition (31.8% among 1488 recorded). Occasional mussels from other localities (Padstow, Teignmouth, Yealm, Saltash) have been observed to have slightly abnormal gills, though perhaps in the majority of these the condition was due to the presence of a large female pea-crab, Pinnotheres pisum. In the Fal Estuary mussels the abnormal conditions were doubtless correlated with some factor in the environment, the percentage of pea-crabs in these being so low (4–8%) that their presence could have no relation to the abnormal condition of the gills.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1930

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE

1.Allen, W. R.The Food and Feeding Habits of Freshwater Mussels. Biol. Bull., Woods Hole. Vol. XXVII, No. 3, pp. 127146, 1914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Allen, W. R.Studies of the Biology of Freshwater Mussels. Biol. Bull., Woods Hole. Vol. XL, No. 4, pp. 210241, 1921.Google Scholar
3.Beer, G. R.de. Growth. London, Arnold and Co., 1924.Google Scholar
4.Bhatia, D.The Structure of the Latero-frontal cells of the gills of Mytilus edulis, Q.J.M.S., Vol. LXX, pp. 681692, 1926.Google Scholar
5.Bloomer, H. H.On some malformed specimens of Anodonta cygnea L Journ. Malacol., Vol. VII, pp. 136138, 1900.Google Scholar
6.Brücke, E. Th. von. Versuche an ausgeschnittenen und nach einer Drehung um 180° reimplantierten Flhnmerschleimhaut-Stücken. Pflüger's Archiv. f. d. ges. Physiol., Bd. 166, pp. 4554, 1916.Google Scholar
7.Carlgren, O.Über die Bedeutung der Flimmerbewegung für den Nahrungstransport bei den Actiniarien und Madreporarien. Biol. Zentralbl., Bd. 25, pp. 308322, 1905.Google Scholar
8.Carter, G. S.On the nervous control of the Velar Cilia of the Nudibranch Veliger. Brit. Journ. Exp. Biol., Vol. 4, pp. 126, 1926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Carter, G. S.On the structure of the Cells bearing the Velar Cilia of the Nudibranch Veliger. Brit. Journ. Exp. Biol., Vol. VI, pp. 97109, 1928.Google Scholar
10.Copeland, M.Locomotion in two species of the Gastropod genus Alectrion with observations on the behaviour of Pedal Cilia. Biol. Bull., Woods Hole. Vol. XXXVII, pp. 126138, 1919.Google Scholar
11.Copeland, M.Ciliary and Muscular Locomotion in the Gastropod genus Polinices. Biol. Bull., Woods Hole. Vol. XLII, pp. 132142, 1922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Elmhirst, R. I.Associations between the amphipod genus Metopa and Cœlenterates. II. The Feeding Habits of the Sea-Anemone Actinoloba. The Scottish Naturalist, pp. 149152, 1925.Google Scholar
13.Engelmann, T. W.Ueber die Flimmerbewegung. Jena. Zeit. f. Naturwiss., Bd. 4, pp. 321–79, 1868.Google Scholar
14.Fedele, M.Le attività dinamiclie ed i rapporti nervosi nella vita dei Dolioli. Public, della Staz. Zool. di Napoli, Vol. 4, pp. 129239, 1923.Google Scholar
15.Grave, C.The Process of Feeding in the Oyster. Science, N.S., Vol. 44, p. 178, 1916.Google Scholar
16.Grave, C., and Schmitt, F. O. A mechanism for the co-ordination and regulation of ciliary movement as revealed by microdissection and cytological studies of ciliated cells of Mollusks. Journ. Morph., Vol. 40, pp. 479610, 1925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Gray, J.The Effects of Ions upon Ciliary Movement. Q.J.M.S., Vol. LXIV, pp. 345371, 1920.Google Scholar
18.Gray, J.The Mechanism of Ciliary Movement. Proc. Roy. Soc., London, B., Vol. 93, pp. 104121, 1922.Google Scholar
19.Gray, J.Ciliary Movement. Camb. Univ. Press, 1928.Google Scholar
19a.Gray, J.The Mechanism of Ciliary Movement. The American Naturalist, Vol. LXIII, pp. 68–51, 1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Herdman, W. A.Note on some points in the structure of the gill of the Ceylon Pearl-oyster. Journ. Linn. Soc. Zool., Vol XXIX, pp. 226229, 1905.Google Scholar
21.Isayama, S.Uber die Flimmerrichtung an verkehrt zur Verheilung gebrachten Abschnitten der Trachea. Zeitschr. f. Biol., Bd. 82, pp. 155156, 1924.Google Scholar
22.Kellog, J. L.Ciliary Mechanisms of Lamellibranchs. Journ. Morph., Vol. 26, pp. 625701, 1915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Kraft, H.Zur Physiologie des Flimmerepithels bei Wirbelthieren. Pflüger's Archiv. ges. Physiol., Bd. XLVII, p. 196, 1890.Google Scholar
24.Lillie, R. S.The conditions determining the rate of conduction in irritable tissues and especially in nerve. Amer. Journ. Physiol., Vol. 34, pp. 414445, 1914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Merton, H.Studien fiber Flimmerbewegung. Pflüger's Archiv. ges. Physiol., Bd. 198, pp. 128, 1923.Google Scholar
26.Merton, H.WillkiirlicheFlimmerbewegung bei Metazoen Biol. Zentralbl.; Bd. 43, pp. 157163, 1923.Google Scholar
27.Merton, H.Die verschiedenen Arten der Flimmerbewegung bei Metazoen. Naturwiss., Jahrg. 12, pp. 452457, 1924.Google Scholar
28.Nelson, T. C.The Mechanism of Feeding in the Oyster. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. and Med., Vol. XXI, pp. 116168, 1923.Google Scholar
29.Orton, J. H.The mode of feeding of Crepidula, with an account of the current-producing mechanism in the mantle cavity, and some remarks on the mode of feeding in Gastropods and Lamellibranchs. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., Vol. IX, pp. 444478, 1912.Google Scholar
30.Parker, G. H.The reactions of Metridium to food and other substances. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., Harvard, Vol. XXIX, No. 2, pp. 107119, 1896.Google Scholar
31.Parker, G. H.The Reversal of ciliary movement in Metazo ans. Amer. Journ. Physiol., Vol. XIII, No. 1, pp. 116, 1905.Google Scholar
32.Parker, G. H.The Elementary Nervous System. Philadelphia, 1918.Google Scholar
33.Parker, G. H., and Marks, A. P.Ciliary Reversal in the sea-anemone Metridium. Journ. Exp. Zool., Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 16, 1928.Google Scholar
34.Peck, R. H.The Minute Structure of the Gills of Lamellibranch Mollusca. Q.J.M.S., Vol. XVII, pp. 4366, 1877.Google Scholar
35.Purkinje, J. E., et Valentin, G. De Phænomeno generali et fundamentali Motus vibratorii continui … Wratislaviæ, 4°, 96 pp., 1835.Google Scholar
36.Rice, E. L.Fusion of Filaments in the Lamellibranch Gill. Biol. Bull., Woods Hole. Vol. II, pp. 7180, 1900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Rice, E. L.Gill development in Mytilus. Biol. Bull, Woods Hole. Vol. XIV, pp. 6177, 1908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.Ridewood, W. G.On the structure of the gills of the Lamelli-branchia. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., Lond. (B), Vol. 195, pp. 147284, 1903.Google Scholar
39.Torrey, B. IIOn the Habits and Reactions of Sagartia davisi. Biol. Bull., Woods Hole. Vol. VI, pp. 203215, 1904.Google Scholar
40.Twitty, V. C.Experimental Studies on the ciliary action of amphibian embryos. Journ. Exp. Zool., Vol. 50, pp. 319344, 1928.Google Scholar
41.Wallengren, H.Zur Biologie der Muscheln. I. Die Wasser-stromungen. Lunds Universitets Arsskrift, N.F., Afd. 2, Bd. 1, No. 2, 1905.Google Scholar
42.Williams, L. W.The Structure of Cilia, especially in Gastropods. Amer. Naturalist, Vol. 41; p. 545, 1907.Google Scholar
43.Weight, F. S.Mussel Beds; their productivity and maintenance. Ann. App. Biol., Vol. IV, No. 3, pp. 123152, 1917.Google Scholar
44.Wyman, J.Neuroid Transmission in ciliated epithelium. Journ. Gen. Physiol., Vol. VII, pp. 545659, 1925.Google Scholar
45.Yonge, C. M.Structure and Physiology of the Organs of Feeding and Digestion in Ostrea edulis. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., Vol. XIV, pp. 295386, 1926.Google Scholar
46.Yonge, C. M.Feeding Mechanisms in the Invertebrates. Biol. Reviews and Biol. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., Vol. III, No. I, pp. 2176, 1928.Google Scholar