Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-13T08:42:15.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the nomenclature of the hydroid, Candelabrum phrygium (Fabricius, 1780) (= Myriothela phrygia, Arum cocksi)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

P. F. S. Cornelius
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, British Museum (Natural History), London, SW75BD

Extract

There has been some confusion over the past 150 years or so concerning the correct combination to be applied to the single species of hydroid variously known as Arum cocksi, Myriothela phrygia and M. cocksi. The correct binominal would seem to be Candelabrum phrygium, a combination first used by de Blainville (1830) but hardly used since. An attempt by Stechow (1921, 1922, 1923) to re-introduce this combination has apparently been unsuccessful. The synonymy relevant to the genus name is as follows. To avoid repetition some information more relevant to the nomenclature of the species name is also included here.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)