Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T02:01:55.465Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Preliminary Consideration of the Taxonomic Position of Palmaria Palmata (Linnaeus) Stackhouse = Rhodymenia Palmata (Linnaeus) Greville

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

M. D. Guiry
M. D. Guiry
Affiliation:
Department of Biology and Geology, The Polytechnic of North London, Holloway Road, London N7 8DB
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The life history and taxonomic position of Rhodymenia palmata (Linnaeus) Greville, one of the commonest red algae in the northern hemisphere, have been a source of considerable speculation. Carpogonial plants and carposporangial plants are unknown although tetrasporangial plants are common and spermatangial plants have been reported on numerous occasions. A parallel situation occurs in the genus Halosaccion Kützing for which carpogonial and carposporangial plants have never been recorded and spermatangial plants are well known only in the species Halosaccion ramentaceum (Linnaeus) J. G. Agardh. It is proposed in this paper to consider the relationship of Rhodymenia palmata to the other genera of the Rhodymeniaceae (Rhodymeniales) particularly Halosaccion and Leptosarca Gepp & Gepp.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , August 1974 , pp. 509 - 528
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agardh, J. G., 1852. Species Genera et Ordines Floridearum sen Descriptiones Succintae Generum et Ordinum quibus Floridearum classis constitiutur. 2, (2), 337–720. Lund: C. W. K. Gleerup.Google Scholar
Agardh, J. G., 1876. Species, Genera et Ordines Algarum., 3. Epicrisis Systematis Floridearum. vii, 1–676, (Addenda) 677–724. Lipsiae: T. O. Weigel.Google Scholar
Buffham, T. H., 1894. On the antheridia, etc., of some Florideae. Journal of the Queckett Microscopical Club, Ser. 2, 5, 291–305.Google Scholar
Dawson, E. Y., 1941. A review of the genus Rhodymenia, with descriptions of new species. Allan Hancock Pacific Expedition, 3, 123–80.Google Scholar
Dawson, E. Y., 1961. A guide to the literature and distribution of Pacific benthic algae from Alaska to the Galapagos Islands. Pacific Science, 15, 370—461.Google Scholar
Dawson, E. Y., 1963. Marine red algae of Pacific Mexico Part VI. Rhodymeniales. Nova Hedwigia, 5, 437–76.Google Scholar
Dawson, E. Y., Acleto, C. & Foldvik, N., 1964. The seaweeds of Peru. Nova Hedwigia (Supplement), 1–111.Google Scholar
Delf, E. M. & Grubb, V. M., 1924. The spermatia of Rhodymenia palmata Ag. Annals of Botany, 38, 327–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, P. S., 1960. Studies On The Marine Algae Of The British Isles: The Genus Ceramium. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 39, 331–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, P. S., 1970. The Rhodophyta: some aspects of their biology II. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review, 8, 307–52.Google Scholar
Edelstein, T., 1972. Halosacciocolax lundii, sp.nov., a new red alga parasitic on Rhodymenia palmata (L.) Grev. British Phycological Journal, 7, 249–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelstein, T. & Mclachlan, J., 1966. Investigations of the marine algae of Nova Scotia, I. Winter flora of the Atlantic coast. Canadian Journal of Botany, 44, 1035–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esper, E. J. C., 1798. Icones Fucorum cum characteribus systematicis synonimis auctorum et descriptionibus novarum speciarum, 2, 57–126.Google Scholar
Gain, L., 1912. La Flore Algologique des Régions Antarctiques et Subantarctiques. Deuxième expédition Antarctique frangaise (1908–1910) commandée par le Dr Jean Charcot, (4) 218. Paris: Masson et Cie.Google Scholar
Gmelin, S. G., 1768. Historia Fucorum (8), 6, 239. Petropoli: ex typographia Academiae Scientarum.Google Scholar
Greville, R. K., 1830. Algae Britannicae, or Descriptions of the Marine and Other Inarticulated Plants of the British Isles belonging to the Order Algae; with plates illustrative of the genera, 4, lxxxviii, 218. London: McLachlan and Steward, Baldwin and Cradock.Google Scholar
Grubb, V. M., 1923. Preliminary note on the reproduction of Rhodymenia palmata Ag. Annals of Botany, 37, 151–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiry, M. D., 1974. The occurrence of the red algal parasite Halosacciocolax lundii Edelstein in Britain. British Phycological Journal, 9, 31–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
L'hardy-Halos, M. T., 1970. Rhodymenia phylloides nov.sp. (Rhodophycées, Rhodymeniale) nouvelle espéce des côtes Bretagne. Bulletin de la Société phycologique de France, 15, 23–30.Google Scholar
Huvé, P. & Huvé, II., 1971. Une nouvelle espèce de Rhodymenia de côtes orientales de Tunisie Rhodymenia leptofaucheiodes nov.sp. Bulletin de la Société phycologique de France, 16, 51–60.Google Scholar
Jónsson, H., 1901. The marine algae of Iceland. I. Rhodophyceae. Botanisk Tidsskrift, 24, 127–55.Google Scholar
Knight, M. & Parke, M. W., 1931. Manx Algae, an algal survey of the south end of the Isle of Man. L.M.B.C. Memoirs on Typical British Marine Plants and Animals, 30, vii (1), 55.Google Scholar
Kuckuck, P., 1897. IV. Meeresalgen vom Sermitdlet - und kleinen Karajkfjord, pp. 28–39.In, Vanhoffen, C. [= E.], Botanische Ergebnisse der von der Gesellschaft für Erdkunde zu Berlin unter Leitung Dr V. Drygalski's ausgesandten Grönlandexpedition nach Dr Vanh¨oftens Sammlungen bearbeitet. Bibliotheca botanica, 42, vii, 75.Google Scholar
Kützing, F. T., 1843. Phycologia Generalis…, xxxii, 458 pp., Leipzig.Google Scholar
Kützing, F. T., 1849. Species Algarum, vi, 922. Lipsiae: Brockhaus.Google Scholar
Kützing, F. T., 1866. Tabulae Phycologicae…, 16, 1–35. Nordhausen.Google Scholar
Kylin, H., 1925. The marine red algae in the vicinity of the biological station at Friday Harbor, Wash. Acta Universitatis lundensis, N.F. avd. 2, 21, 1–87.Google Scholar
Kylin, H., 1930. Über die entwicklungsgeschichte der Florideen. Acta Universitatis lundensis, N.F. avd. 2, 26 (6), 1–104.Google Scholar
Kylin, H., 1931. Die Florideenordnung Rhodymeniales. Acta Universitatis lundensis, N.F. avd. 2, 26 (11), 1–48.Google Scholar
Kylin, H., 1956. Die Gattungen der Rhodophyceen. xv, 673. Lund: C. W. K. Gleerup.Google Scholar
Kylin, H. & Skottsberg, C. 1919. Zur Kenntnis der subantarktischen und antarktischen Meeresalgen. II. Rhodophyceen. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Schwedischen Südpolarexpedition, 1901–1903. 4.Google Scholar
Lamouroux, J. V., 1805. Dissertations sur plusieurs espèces de fucus peu connues ou nouvelles avec leur description en latin et en français, xxiv, 83, (2), Paris: Agen.Google Scholar
Lee, I. K. & Kurogi, M., 1972. Ecological observation of the members of Rhodymeniales in Hokkaido, pp. 131–4. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Seaweed Symposium, Sapporo, Japan, August 8–12,1971 (ed. K., Nisizawa), xvi, 646. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C, 1753. Species Plantarum…, 1200 pp.Google Scholar
Lund, S., 1959. The marine algae of East Greenland I. Taxonomical Part. Meddelelser om Grenland af Komissionen for Ledelsen af de geologiske og geografiske Undersegelser i Gronland, 156 (1), 1–247.Google Scholar
Montagne, J. F. C., 1839. Cryptogamae brasilienses seu Plantae cellulares quas in itinere per Brasiliam a celeb. Auguste de Saint-Hilaire collectas recensuit observationibusque nonnullis illustravit. Annaĺes des sciences naturelles, Botanique, 12, 42–55.Google Scholar
Munda, I., 1972. On the chemical composition, distribution and ecology of some common benthic marine algae from Iceland. Botanica marina, 15, 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagi, M., 1940–41. Marine algae of the Kurile Islands I and II, Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture Hokkaido (imperial) University, 46, 1–310.Google Scholar
Newton, L., 1931. A Handbook of the British Seaweeds, 2, xiii, 478 pp. London: British Museum (Nat. Hist.).Google Scholar
Postels, A. & Ruprecht, F., 1840. Illustrationes Algarum in Itinere circa Orbem…, Exsecuto in Oceano Pacifico Imprimis Septrionali ad Littora Rossica Asiatico - Americana Ccllectarum. iv, 22, (2) pp. Petropoli: Eduardi Pratz.Google Scholar
Rosenvinge, L. K., 1931. The marine algae of Denmark…, Part IV, Rhodophyceae IV (Gigartiniales, Rhodymeniales, Nemastomales). Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskabs Skrifter, 7 Raekke, 491–627.Google Scholar
Roth, A. G., 1797. Catalecta Botanica quibus Plantae Novae et Minus Cognitae Describuntur atque Illustratur, viii, 244, (9), 1. Lipsiae: I. G. Mulleriano.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruprecht, F. J., 1851. Tange des Ochotskischen Meeres. In: Reise in den Aüssersten Norden und Osten Sibiriens Während der Jahre 1843 und 1844 (ed. A. T., von Middendorff), 1 (2), Botanik, 191–435. St Petersburg.Google Scholar
Scagel, R. F., 1957. An annotated list of the marine algae of British Columbia and Northern Washington (including Keys to Genera). Bulletin. National Museum of Canada, 150, vi, 289.Google Scholar
Scagel, R. F., 1964. Some problems in algal distribution in the North Pacific. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Seaweed Symposium Biarritz September 1961 (ed. A., Davy de Virville and J., Feldmann), 259–64. Oxford, London, New York and Paris: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Schmitz, F., 1889. Systematische ubersicht der bisher bekannten gattungen der Florideen. Flora, oder allgemeine botanische Zeitung, 72, 435–56.Google Scholar
Setchell, W. A. & Gardner, N. L., 1903. Algae of northwestern America. University of California Publications in Botany, 1, 165–418.Google Scholar
Silva, P. C, 1952. A review of nomenclatural conservation in the red algae from the point of view of the type method. University of California Publications in Botany, 25, 241–323.Google Scholar
Sjöstedt, L. D., 1926. Floridean studies. Acta Universitatis lundensis, N.F. avd. 2, 22 (4), 1–94.Google Scholar
Skottsberg, C, 1923. Botanische ergebnisse der Schwedischen expedition nach Patagonien und dem Feuerlande 1907–1909. IX. Marine algae 2. Rhodophyceae. Kungliga Svenska vetenskapsakademiens handlingar, 63 (8), 1–70.Google Scholar
Skottsberg, C, 1953. On two collections of Antarctic marine algae. Arkiv. fö;r Botanik, Ser. 2, 2, (7), 531–66.Google Scholar
Smith, G. M., 1944. Marine Algae of the Monterey Peninsula California, ix, 610 pp. Stanford:Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
South, G. R. & Cardinal, A., 1970. A check-list of marine algae of eastern Canada. Canadian Journal of Botany, 48 (12), 2077–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparling, S. R., 1957. The structure and reproduction of some members of the Rhodymeniaceae. University of California Publications in Botany, 29 (3), 319–96.Google Scholar
Sparling, S. R., 1961. A report on the culture of some species of halosaccion, rhodymenia and fauchea. American Journal of Botany, 48 (6), 493–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stackhouse, J., 1797. Nereis Britannica.…, 2, pp. ix-xxiv, 31–70. Bath and London: Hazard.Google Scholar
Stackhouse, J., 1801. Nereis Britannica…, 3, pp. xxv-xl, 71–112 (4), (2), (1). Bath and London: Hazard.Google Scholar
Taylor, W. R., 1945. Pacific marine algae of the Allan Hancock Expedition to the Galapagos Islands. Allan Hancock Pacific Expedition, 12 (4) iv, 528.Google Scholar
Taylor, W. R., 1957. Marine Algae of the Northeastern Coast of North America (2nd ed.), viii, 2, 509. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, W. R., 1960. Marine Algae of the Eastern Tropical and Subtropical Coasts of the Americas, ix, 870. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Thuret, M. G., 1855. Recherches sur la fecondation des Fucacees et les anthéridies des algues. Annales des sciences naturelles, Botanique, 3, 5–28 +pis. 2–4.Google Scholar
Tokida, J., 1954. The marine algae of southern Saghalien. Memoirs of the Faculty of Fisheries, Hokkaido University, 2 (1), (4), 264.Google Scholar
Tokida, J. & Masaki, T., 1959. Studies on the reproductive organs of red algae III on the structure and development of female organs in Schizymenia dubyi, Gymnogongrus flabelliformis and Rhodymenia pertusa. Bulletin of the Faculty of Fisheries, Hokkaido University, 10 (2), 87–96.Google Scholar
Westbrook, M. A., 1928. Contributions to the cytology of tetrasporic plants of Rhodymenia palmata (L.) Grev., and some other Florideae. Annals of Botany, 42 (165), 149–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zlnova, A. D., 1955. Opredlitel krasnykh vodorski severnykh morei S.S.S.R. (Rhodophyceae of the northern seas of the U.S.S.R.), 220 pp. Moscow. (In Russian.)Google Scholar