Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T22:37:48.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structure and Physiology of the Organs of Feeding and Digestion in Ostrea edulis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

C. M. Yonge
C. M. Yonge
Affiliation:
Temporary Assistant Naturalist at the Plymouth Laboratory
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The anatomy and histology of the food collecting and alimentary organs of the adult oyster are described.

The anatomy of the stomach is investigated with the aid of gelatin casts and attention drawn to the food caecum, the ventral groove, and the two ducts of the digestive diverticula.

Cilia and mucus glands are universal throughout the food collecting and alimentary organs.

There is evidence that the gastric shield is composed of fused cilia.

The histology of the style-sac resembles that described by Mackintosh for Crepidula. There is evidence that secretion of the style takes place in the groove.

Phagocytes are everywhere numerous in the blood vessels, connective tissue and epithelia, and free in the gut and mantle cavity.

The alimentary organs of the larva are described.

The anatomy and histology of these organs in the spat isdescribed, the palps are relatively large and the gills asymmetrical. The style-sac is distinct from the mid-gut.

The course of the ciliary currents on the gills and palps is described and the importance of the various selective mechanisms emphasized.Selection appears to be purely quantitative, large particles or mucus masses being rejected and smaller ones accepted.

Muscular activity is of great importance in the functioning of both gills and palps. Reversal of cilia has never been seen.

Rejected matter is removed from the mantle cavity.

Material is sorted in the food caecum in the stomach, larger particles passing into the mid-gut and smaller ones towards the gastric shield and ducts of the digestive diverticula, within the tubules of which there is a constant circulation.

The rotation of the style assists in the stirring of matter in the stomach.

In the style-sac are cilia, which rotate the style and others which push it into the storuach.

In the larva the velum acts as a food collecting organ ; the style lies in an extension of the stomach and rotates rapidly. Material passes freely into the digestive diverticula.

In the spat rejective mechanisms are highly developed. The style revolves at a speed of between sixty and seventy revolutions per minute.

The tubules of the digestive diverticula are the only place where soluble matter is absorbed, in adult, larvae, or spat.

Fine particles are ingested and digested intracellularly in the tubules of the digestive diverticula, the products of digestion carried away by amoebocytes, and useless matter rejected into the lumen.

Larger particles are ingested and digested by phagocytes in all parts, the products of digestion being carried to the vesicular connective tissue cells and there stored.

Enzymes in the style digest starch and glycogen. The amylase, at pH 5.9, has an optimum temperature of 43'C, and is destroyed at

The optimum medium is pH 5-9. It is inactivated by purification with absolute alcohol or by dialysis, but action is restored on the addition of chlorides or bromides and to a less extent iodides, nitrates, and carbonates, but not with sulphates or fluorides.

Sucroclastic enzymes in the digestive diverticula act on starch, glycogen, sucrose, raffinose, maltose, lactose, salicin, and amygdalin, but not on inulin, cellulose, or pentosans.

The amylase, at pH 5-5, has an optimum temperature of 44-5, and is destroyed at between 64 and 67. It has an optimum pH of 5-5, and is inactivated after purification or dialysis, action being restored in the presence of chlorides or bromides.

There is a weak lipase and protease, the latter has two optima at pH 3-7 and at or above 9-0 ; its action is very slow.

The only enzymes free in the stomach are those from the style.

There is no evidence of any enzymes free in the gill mucus.

There is a powerful complete oxidase system in the style, and a catalase in the digestive diverticula and gonad, and traces in the palps, gills, and muscle.

The style is the most acid substance in the gut and the cause of the acidity of the gut.

The style is dissolved rapidly in fluid of pH 2-3 and above, but very slowly below that point. It is readily dissolved and reformed in the oyster, its presence depending on the maintenance of the balance between the rate of secretion and the rate of dissolution. Its condition is a valuable indication of the state of metabolism.

Glycogen and fat are stored, particularly in the vesicular connective tissue cells, the former furnishing the principal reserve food material.

The presence of abundant supplies of microscopic plant life rich in carbohydrates provides ideal food for the oyster, and represents optimum conditions for fattening and reproduction.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , August 1926 , pp. 295 - 386
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1926

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

10. BIBLIOGRAPHY

Allen, W. R. 1914. The Food and Feeding Habits of Fresh-water Mussels. Biol. Bull, 27, p. 127.Google Scholar
Allen, W. R. 1921. Studies on the Biology of Fresh-water Mussels. Experimental Studies on the Food Relations of Certain Unionidse. Biol. Bull., 40, p. 210.Google Scholar
Barrois, T. 1889. Le Stylet Cristallin des Lamellibranches. Rev. biol. N. France, 3, 4, pp. 124, 161, 263; 5, pp. 209, 299, 351.Google Scholar
Berkeley, C. 1923. On the Crystalline Style as a possible factor in the Anærobic Respiration of certain Marine Mollusks. Journ. Exp. Zool., 37, p. 477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bierry, H., Giaja, J., et Henri, V. 1906. Inactivité amylolytique du sue pancréatique dialysé. C. R. Soc. Biol., 60, p. 479.Google Scholar
Blegvad, H. 1914. Food and Conditions of Nourishment among the Commimities of Invertebrate Animals found on or in the Sea Bottom in Danish Waters. Rept. Dan. Biol.' Sta., 22, p. 41.Google Scholar
Bodansky, M., and Rose, W. C. 1922. The Digestive Enzymes of Coelenterates. Amer. Journ. Physiol., 62, p. 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boysen Jensen, P. 1914. Studies concerning the Organic Matter of the Sea Bottom. Rept. Dan. Biol. Sta., 22, p. 1.Google Scholar
Brandt, K. 1900. Beitrage zur Kenntniss der chemischen Zusammensetzung des Planktons. Wiss. Meeresunters. Kiel, N.F., 3, p. 43.Google Scholar
Bruyne, C. De. 1893. De la phagocytose observée, sur le vivant, dans les branchies des Mollusques lamellibranches. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris., 116, p. 65.Google Scholar
Bruyne, C. De. 1896. Contribution à, l'étude de la Phagocytose (1). Arch, de Biol., 14, p. 161.Google Scholar
Canegallo, M. A. 1924. I Leucociti, l'Intestino e le Branchie nell' alimentazione delle Unio. Riv. di Biol., 6, p. 614.Google Scholar
Carazzi, D. 1896. Ricerche sulle Ostriche verdi. Mitth. Zool. Stat. Neapel, 12, p. 381.Google Scholar
Carazzi, D. 1897. Ricerche Sull' Assorbimento Del Ferro Nef Oslrea Edulis L. Internat. Monatsschr. Anat. Hist., 14, p. 117.Google Scholar
Churchill, E. P. 1915. The Absorption Of Fat By Fresh-Water Mussels. Biol. Bull., 29, P. 68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchill, E. P. 1916. The Absorption of Nutriment from Solution by Fresh-water Mussels. Journ. Exp. Zool., 21, p. 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchill, E. P. 1920. The Oyster and the Oyster Industry of the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts. U.S.B.F., Doc. No. 890.Google Scholar
Churchill, E. P., and Lewis, S. I. 1924. Food and Feeding in Fresh-water Mussels. Bull. U.S.B.F., 39, p. 437.Google Scholar
Cobb, P. H. 1918. Autonomous responses of the Labial Palps of Anodonta. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., U.S.A., 4, p. 234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coker, R. E., Shira, A. F., Clark, H. W., and Howard, A. D. 1921. Natural History and Propagation of Fresh-water Mussels. Bull. U.S.B.F., 37, p. 75.Google Scholar
Compton, A. 1921. Studies in the Mechanism of Enzyme Action. I. Rôle of the Reaction of the Medium in Fixing the Optimum Temperature of a Ferment. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., B 92, p. 1.Google Scholar
Coupin, H. 1900. Sur les fonctions de la tige cristalline des Acephales. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 130, p. 1214.Google Scholar
Cuénot, L. 1914. Les organes phagocytaires des Mollusques. Arch. Zool. Expér., 54, p. 267.Google Scholar
Dakin, W. J. 1909. Pecten. Liverpool Marine Biol. Comm. Memoirs, 17.Google Scholar
Edmondson, C. H. 1920. The Reformation of the Crystalline Style in Mya arenaria after Extraction. Journ. Exp. Zool., 30, p. 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrhard, H. 1910. Studien über Flimmerzellen. Arch, f. Zellforschung, 4, p. 309.Google Scholar
Fredericq, L. 1878. La Digestion des Matieres albuminoides chez quelques Invertébrés. Arch. Zool. Exper., 7, p. 391.Google Scholar
Gorka, S. 1916. Über die Rolle der Kiemen und Mundlappen der heimischen Süsswassermusciieln bei der Ernähmng. Alatt. Kozlem Budapest, 15, p. 281.Google Scholar
Grave, C. 1916. The Process of Feeding in the Oyster. Science, N.S. 44, p. 178.Google Scholar
Gutheil, F. 1911. Über Wimperapparat und Mitose von Flimmerzellen. Zool. Anz., 37, p. 331.Google Scholar
Gutheil, F. 1912. Über den Darmkanal und die Mitteldarmdrüse von Anodonta cellensis. Zeit. wiss. Zool., 99, p. 444.Google Scholar
Herdman, W. A., and Boyce, R. 1899. Oysters and Disease. Lane-Sea Fisheries Memoir, No. 1.Google Scholar
Heymann, J. A. 1914. De Voeding der Œster. 's Gravenhage.Google Scholar
Hirsch, G. C. 1914. Die Ernährungsbiologie fleishfressender Gastropoden. Zool. Jahrb. Abt. Zool. u. Physiol., 35, p. 357.Google Scholar
Horst, R. 1886. The Development of the Oyster. Rep. U.S.F.C, 12, p. 891.Google Scholar
Hunt, O. D. 1925. The Food of the Bottom Fauna of the Plymouth Fishing Grounds. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, N.S., 13, p. 560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellogg, J. L. 1892. A Contribution to our Knowledge of the Morphology of Lamellibranchiate Mollusks. Bull. U.S.F.C, 10, p. 389.Google Scholar
Kellogg, J. L. 1915. Ciliary Mechanisms of Lamellibranchs with descriptions of Anatomy. Journ. Morph., 26, p. 625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krijgsman, B. J. 1925. Arbeitsrhythmus der Verdauungsdrüsen bei Helix pomatia. Zeit. vergl. Physiol., 2, p. 264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lankester, E. Ray. 1886. On Green Oysters. Q.J.M.S., 26, p. 71.Google Scholar
Lankester, E. Ray. 1893. Phagocytes of Green Oysters. Nature, 48, p. 75.Google Scholar
List, T. 1902. Die Mytiliden. Fauna und Flora des Golfes von Neapel, 27.Google Scholar
Lotsy, J. P. 1893. The Food of the Oyster, Clam, and Eibbed Mussel. Rep. U.S.F.C., 19, p. 375.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, N. A. 1925. The Crystalline Style in Gastropods. Q.J.M.S., 69, p. 317.Google Scholar
Macmunn, C. A. 1900. On the Gastric Gland of Mollusca and Decapod Crustacea: its Structure and Functions. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond., 193, p. 1.Google Scholar
Martin, G. W. 1923. Food of the Oyster. Bot. Gaz., 75, p. 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthias, M. 1914. Untersuchungen uber den Darmkanal und das Herz einiger Arcaceen. Jen. Zeit. f. Natur., 52, p. 363.Google Scholar
Mitchell, P. H. 1916. Nutrition of Oysters: Glycogen Formation and Storage. Bull. U.S.B.F., 35, p. 151.Google Scholar
Mitchell, P. H. 1916a. Nutrition of Oysters: The Nature of the so-called “ Fattening ” of Oysters. Bull. U.S.B.F., 35, p. 477.Google Scholar
Mitchell, P. H., and Barney, R. L. 1916. The Occurrence in Virginia of Green-gilled Oysters similar to those of Marennes. Bull. U.S.B.F., 35, p. 135.Google Scholar
Mitra, S. B. 1901. The Crystalline Style of Lamellibranchia. Q.J.M.S., 44, p. 591.Google Scholar
Nelson, T. C. 1918. On the Origin, Nature, and Function of the Crystalline Style of Lamellibranchs. Journ. Morph., 31, p. 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, T. C. 1921. Report of the Department of Biology. (For the Year ending June 30, 1920). N.J. Agr. Exp. Station.Google Scholar
Nelson, T. C. 1924. The Mechanism of Feeding in the Oyster. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. and Med., 21, p. 166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, T. C. 1925. Recent Contributions to the Knowledge of the Crystalline Style of Lamellibranchs. Biol. Bull., 49, p. 86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orton, J. H. 1912. The Mode of Feeding in Crepidula, etc. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, N.S., 9, p. 444.Google Scholar
Orton, J. H. 1923. Fishery Investigations. Series II, 6, No. 3.Google Scholar
Petersen, C. G. J., and Jensen, P. B. 1911. Valuation of the Sea. 1. Animal Life of the Sea Bottom, its Food and Quantity. Rept. Dan. Biol. Sta., 20.Google Scholar
Potts, F. A. 1923. The Structure and Function of the Liver of Teredo, the Shipworm. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. (Biol. Sci.), 1, p. 1.Google Scholar
Ranson, G. 1926. La nutrition chez les animaux aquatiques. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 182, p. 1102.Google Scholar
Ridewood, W. G. 1903. On the Structure of the Gills of the Lamellibranchia. Phil. Trana. Roy. Soc. Lond., 195, p. 147.Google Scholar
Russell, E. S. 1923. Report on Seasonal Variation in the Chemical Composition of Oysters. Fishery Investigations. Series II, 6, No. 1.Google Scholar
Savage, R. E. 1925. The Food of the Oyster. Fishery Investigations. Series II, 8, No. 1.Google Scholar
Siebert, W. 1913. Das Körperepithel von Anodonta cellensis. Zeit. wiss. Zool., 106, p. 449.Google Scholar
Sigerfoos, C. P. 1908. Natural History, Organization, and late Development of the TeredinidEe, or Ship-worms. Bull. U.S.B.F., 27, p. 191.Google Scholar
Spärck, R. 1925. Studies on the Biology of the Oyster. Rept. Dan. Biol. Sta., 30.Google Scholar
Stafford, J. 1913. The Canadian Oyster. Ottawa.Google Scholar
Starkenstein, B. 1910. Eigenschaften und Wirkungsweise des diastatischen Fermentes der Warmblüter. Biochem. Zeit., 24, p. 191.Google Scholar
Starkenstein, E. 1910a. Ueber Fermentwirkung und deren Beeinflüssung durch Neutralsalze. Biochem. Zeit., 24, p. 210.Google Scholar
Van Rynberk, G. 1908. Sur le rôle fonctionnel du ‘;Stylet crystallin’ des Mollusques. Arch. Ital. Biol., 49, p. 435.Google Scholar
Vonk, H. J. 1924. Verdauungsphagocytose bei den Austern. Zeitvergl. Physiol., 1, p. 607.Google Scholar
Wallengren, H. 1905. Zur Biologie der Muscheln: I. Die Wasserstromungen; II. Die Nahrungsaufnahme. Lund. Univ. Aarskr., Ser. II, 1, Nos. 2 and 3.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M. 1923. The Mechanism of Feeding, Digestion, and Assimilation in the Lamellibranch Mya. Brit. Journ. Exper. Biol., 1, p. 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, C. M. 1924. The Mechanism of Feeding, Digestion, and Assimilation in Nephrops norvegicus. Brit. Journ. Exper. Biol., 1, p. 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, C. M. 1925. Secretion, Digestion, and Assimilation in the Gut ofCiona intestinalis. Brit. Journ. Exper. Biol., 2, p. 373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, C. M. 1925a. The Digestion of Cellulose by Invertebrates. Science Progress. 20, p. 242.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M. 1925b. The Hydrogen Ion Concentration in the Gut of certain Lamellibranchs and Gastropods. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, N.S., 13, p. 938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, C. M. 1926. The Digestive Diverticula in the Lamellibranchs. Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 54, p. 703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, C. M. 1926a. The Disappearance of the Crystalline Style. Nature, 117, p. 691.Google Scholar