Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Assessing the Effect of Information on the Reservation Price for Champagne: What are Consumers Actually Paying for?*

  • Pierre Combris (a1), Christine Lange (a2) and Sylvie Issanchou (a3)
Abstract

Two series of Vickrey auctions have been performed to assess the effect of packaging information (bottle and label) on the reservation prices of ordinary consumers for five brut non-vintage Champagnes. As in other studies on wine tasting, packaging information is found to explain much more of the variation in willingness to pay than sensory information. Participants are unable, or unwilling, to put different values on the Champagnes after blind tasting, but significant differences in reservation prices appear when labels are disclosed. Detailed analysis of choices reveals a large heterogeneity in individual behaviors and valuations of the Champagnes included in this study. (JEL Classification: C91, D12)

Copyright
References
Hide All
Becker, G., DeGroot, M. and Marschak, J. (1964). Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioural Science, 9, 226232.
Combris, P., Lange, C. and Issanchou, S. (2001). Assessing the effect of information on the reservation price for Champagne: second price compared to BDM auctions with unspecified price bounds. Oenometries VIII Conference, May 21–22, Napa Valley, California, and 6th Conference of Experimental Economics, May 23–24, 2002, Paris.
Hayes, D., Shogren, J., Shin, S.Y. and Kliebenstein, J. (1995). Valuing food safety in experimental auction markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77, 4053.
Hoffman, E., Menkhaus, D., Chakravarti, D., Field, R. and Whipple, G. (1993). Using laboratory experimental auctions in marketing research: a case study of new packaging for fresh beef. Marketing Science, 12, 318338.
Kagel, J.H. (1995). Auctions: a survey of experimental research in Kagel, J.H. and Roth, A.E. (eds). The Handbook of Experimental Economics, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 501585.
Lange, C., Martin, C., Chabanet, C., Combris, P. and Issanchou, S. (2002). Impact of the information provided to the consumers on their willingness to pay for Champagne: comparison with hedonic score. Food Quality and Preference, 13, 597608.
Lecocq, S., Magnac, T., Pichery, M.C. and Visser, M. (1999). The Impact of information on wine auction prices: results of an experiment. Document de travail CREST, 9936.
Lecocq, S. and Visser, M. (2006). What determines wine prices: objectives vs. sensory characteristics? Journal of Wine Economics, 1, 4256.
Lecocq, S. and Visser, M. (2001). Is the average of expert tasters' grades a good price predictor? Mimeo.
Melton, B., Huffman, W., Shogren, J. and Fox, J. (1996). Consumer preferences for fresh food items with multiple quality attributes: evidence from an experimental auction of pork chops. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78, 916923.
Menkhaus, D., Borden, G., Whipple, G., Hoffman, E. and Field, R. (1992). An empirical application of laboratory experimental auctions in marketing research. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 17(1), 4455.
Morrat, G., Brochet, F. and Dubourdieu, D. (2001). The color of odors. Brain and Language, 79, 309320.
Vickrey, W. (1961). Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance, 16, 837.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Wine Economics
  • ISSN: 1931-4361
  • EISSN: 1931-437X
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-wine-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 29 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 189 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st May 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.