Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Drifting Towards Bordeaux? The Evolving Varietal Emphasis of U.S. Wine Regions*

  • Julian M. Alston (a1), Kym Anderson (a2) and Olena Sambucci (a3)

In an ever-more-competitive global market, vignerons compete for the attention of consumers by trying to differentiate their product while also responding to technological advances, climate changes and evolving demand patterns. In doing so, they highlight their regional and varietal distinctiveness. This paper examines the extent to which the winegrape varietal mix varies within and among states of the United States and relative to the rest of the world, and how that picture has been evolving. It reports varietal intensity indexes for different regions, indexes of similarity of varietal mix between regions and over time, and price-based quality indexes across regions and varieties within and among the three west-coast States. Broadly speaking, the mix of winegrape varieties in the United States is not very different from that in the rest of the world and, since 2000, it has become even less differentiated and closer to that of France and the world as a whole. But individual U.S. regions vary considerably in the mix of varieties in which they specialize and in the quality of grapes they produce of a given variety; and region-by-variety interactions have complex influences on the pattern of quality and production. We use measures of regional varietal comparative advantage and a Nerlovian partial adjustment model to account for some of the shifting varietal patterns in the U.S. vineyard and in winegrape production. (JEL Classification: D24, L66, Q13)

Corresponding author
e-mail: (corresponding author).
Hide All

The authors are grateful for meticulous research assistance by Nanda Aryal in compiling the database and indicators, for helpful comments from an anonymous reviewer, Jim Lapsley and participants at the AAWE Conference in Walla Walla WA in June 2014, and for financial assistance from the Australian Grape and Wine Authority (GWRDC Project Number UA 12/08) and the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under award number 2011-51181-30635 (the VitisGen project). Views expressed are the authors' alone

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

O. Ashenfelter , and K. Storchmann (2016). Climate change and wine: A review of the economic implications. Journal of Wine Economics, 11(1), forthcoming.

S. Nickell (1981). Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects. Econometric a, 49(6), 14171426.

K.B. Fuller , J.M. Alston , and O.S. Sambucci (2014). The value of Powdery Mildew resistance in grapes: Evidence from California. Wine Economics and Policy, 3(2), 90107.

D.A. Sumner , H. Bombrun , J.M. Alston , and D.M. Heien (2004). North America. In Kym Anderson (ed.), Globalization of the World's Wine Markets, London: Edward Elgar.

R. Volpe , R. Green , and D. Heien (2011). Estimating the supply elasticity of California wine grapes using regional systems of equations. Journal of Wine Economics 5(2), 219–35.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Wine Economics
  • ISSN: 1931-4361
  • EISSN: 1931-437X
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-wine-economics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

Alston supplementary material
Online Appendix

 Word (1.5 MB)
1.5 MB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 33 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 197 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.