Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-l69ms Total loading time: 0.531 Render date: 2022-08-14T11:08:25.560Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Foreign to whom? Constraining the moral foreign language effect on bilinguals’ language experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2022

Nicola Del Maschio
Affiliation:
Centre for Neurolinguistics and Psycholinguistics, Faculty of Psychology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Gianpaolo Del Mauro
Affiliation:
Centre for Neurolinguistics and Psycholinguistics, Faculty of Psychology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Camilla Bellini
Affiliation:
Centre for Neurolinguistics and Psycholinguistics, Faculty of Psychology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Jubin Abutalebi
Affiliation:
Centre for Neurolinguistics and Psycholinguistics, Faculty of Psychology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University The Arctic University of Norway
Simone Sulpizio*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca Milan Center for Neuroscience (NeuroMI), University of Milano-Bicocca
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: simone.sulpizio@unimib.it

Abstract

The moral foreign language effect (MFLE) describes how people’s decisions may change when a moral dilemma is presented in either their native (NL) or foreign language (FL). Growing attention is being directed to unpacking what aspects of bilingualism may influence the MFLE, though with mixed or inconclusive results. The current study aims to bridge this gap by adopting a conceptualization of bilingualism that frames this construct as a composite and continuous measure. In a between-group analysis, we asked 196 Italian–English bilinguals to perform a moral dilemmas task in either their NL (i.e., Italian) or FL (i.e., English). In a within-group analysis, we evaluated the effects of FL age of acquisition, FL proficiency, and language dominance – all measured as continuous variables – on moral decision-making. Overall, findings indicate that differences within bilinguals’ language experience impact moral decisions in an FL. However, the effect of the linguistic factors considered was not ubiquitous across dilemmas, and not always emerged into a MFLE. In light of these results, our study addresses the importance of treating bilingualism as multidimensional, rather than a unitary variable. It also discusses the need to reconceptualize the FLE and its implications on moral decision-making.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of UK Cognitive Linguistics Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alter, A. L., Oppenheimer, D. M., Epley, N., & Eyre, R. N. (2007). Overcoming intuition: Metacognitive difficulty activates analytic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 569576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartels, D. M. (2008). Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making. Cognition, 108, 381417.Google ScholarPubMed
Baum, S., & Titone, D. (2014). Moving toward a neuroplasticity view of bilingualism, executive control, and aging. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 857894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, C. W., McGraw, A. P., Bartels, D. M., & Warren, C. (2014). Revisiting external validity: Concerns about trolley problems and other sacrificial dilemmas in moral psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 536554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Białek, M., Paruzel-Czachura, M., & Gawronski, B. (2019). Foreign language effects on moral dilemma judgments: An analysis using the CNI model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 85, 103855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borg, J. S., Hynes, C., Van Horn, J., Grafton, S., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2006). Consequences, action, and intention as factors in moral judgments: An fMRI investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 803817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, S. (2019). The auditory foreign-language effect of moral decision making in highly proficient bilinguals. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40, 865878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell-Harris, C. L. (2015). Emotionality differences between a native and foreign language: Implications for everyday life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 214219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell-Harris, C. L., Staroselsky, M., Smashnaya, S., & Vasilyeva, N. (2012). Emotional resonances of bilinguals’ two languages vary with age of arrival: The Russian–English bilingual experience in the US. In Wilson, P. (Ed.), Dynamicity in emotion concepts (pp. 373395). Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Cao, F., Zhang, J., Song, L., Wang, S., Miao, D., & Peng, J. (2017). Framing effect in the trolley problem and footbridge dilemma: Number of saved lives matters. Psychological Reports, 120, 88101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmona-Perera, M., Marti, C., Pérez-García, M., & Verdejo-García, A. (2013). Valence of emotions and moral decision-making: Increased pleasantness to pleasant images and decreased unpleasantness to unpleasant images are associated with utilitarian choices in healthy adults. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Čavar, F., & Tytus, A. E. (2018). Moral judgement and foreign language effect: When the foreign language becomes the second language. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39, 1728.Google Scholar
Cecchetto, C., Rumiati, R. I., & Parma, V. (2017). Promoting cross-culture research on moral decision-making with standardized, culturally-equivalent dilemmas: The 4CONFiDe set. Journal of Health and Social Sciences, 22, 173194.Google Scholar
Chan, Y. L., Gu, X., Ng, J. C. K., & Tse, C. S. (2016). Effects of dilemma type, language, and emotion arousal on utilitarian vs deontological choice to moral dilemmas in Chinese-English bilinguals. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 5565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, J. F., Flexas, A., Calabrese, M., Gut, N. K., & Gomila, A. (2014). Moral judgment reloaded: A moral dilemma validation study. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, J. F., & Gomila, A. (2012). Moral dilemmas in cognitive neuroscience of moral decision-making: A principled review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 12491264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cipolletti, H., McFarlane, S., & Weissglass, C. (2016). The moral foreign language effect. Philosophical Psychology, 29, 2340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, P., & Gawronski, B. (2013). Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: A process dissociation approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 216235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conway, P., Goldstein-Greenwood, J., Polacek, D., & Greene, J. D. (2018). Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers. Cognition, 179, 241265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corey, J. D., Hayakawa, S., Foucart, A., Aparici, M., Botella, J., Costa, A., & Keysar, B. (2017). Our moral choices are foreign to us. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 11091128.Google ScholarPubMed
Costa, A., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Keysar, B. (2019). Language context and decision-making: Challenges and advances. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, A., Foucart, A., Hayakawa, S., Aparici, M., Apesteguia, J., Heafner, J., & Keysar, B. (2014). Your morals depend on language. PloS One, 9, e94842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cushman, F., Young, L., & Hauser, M. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17(12), 10821089.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Luca, V., Rothman, J., Bialystok, E., & Pliatsikas, C. (2019). Redefining bilingualism as a spectrum of experiences that differentially affects brain structure and function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116, 75657574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Maschio, N., Crespi, F., Peressotti, F., Abutalebi, J., & Sulpizio, S. (2022). Decision-making depends on language: A meta-analysis of the Foreign Language Effect. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 114. doi: 10.1017/S1366728921001012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedeli, D., Del Maschio, N., Sulpizio, S., Rothman, J., & Abutalebi, J. (2021). The bilingual structural connectome: Dual-language experiential factors modulate distinct cerebral networks. Brain and Language, 220, 104978.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fricke, M., Zirnstein, M., Navarro-Torres, C., & Kroll, J. F. (2019). Bilingualism reveals fundamental variation in language processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22, 200207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garrigan, B., Adlam, A. L., & Langdon, P. E. (2016). The neural correlates of moral decision-making: A systematic review and meta-analysis of moral evaluations and response decision judgements. Brain and Cognition, 108, 8897.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gawinkowska, M., Paradowski, M. B., & Bilewicz, M. (2013). Second language as an exemptor from sociocultural norms. Emotion-related language choice revisited. PloS One, 8, e81225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gao, S., Zika, O., Rogers, R. D., & Thierry, G. (2015). Second language feedback abolishes the “hot hand” effect during even-probability gambling. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(15), 59835989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geipel, J., Hadjichristidis, C., & Surian, L. (2015a). How foreign language shapes moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 59, 817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geipel, J., Hadjichristidis, C., & Surian, L. (2015b). The foreign language effect on moral judgment: The role of emotions and norms. PloS One, 10, e0131529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, J., & Haidt, J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 517523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greene, J. D., Cushman, F. A., Stewart, L. E., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2009). Pushing moral buttons: The interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment. Cognition, 111(3), 364371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44, 389400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 21052108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gullifer, J. W., Chai, X. J., Whitford, V., Pivneva, I., Baum, S., Klein, D., & Titone, D. (2018). Bilingual experience and resting-state brain connectivity: Impacts of L2 age of acquisition and social diversity of language use on control networks. Neuropsychologia, 117, 123134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hadjichristidis, C., Geipel, J., & Savadori, L. (2015). The effect of foreign language in judgments of risk and benefit: The role of affect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 21, 117129.Google ScholarPubMed
Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis on moral psychology. Science, 316, 9981002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayakawa, S., Tannenbaum, D., Costa, A., Corey, J. D., & Keysar, B. (2017). Thinking more or feeling less? Explaining the foreign-language effect on moral judgment. Psychological Science, 28, 13871397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 4981). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1959). Foundations of the metaphysics of morals. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kazanas, S. A., McLean, J. S., & Altarriba, J. (2019). Emotion and emotion concepts: Processing and use in monolingual and bilingual speakers. In Schwieter, J. W., & Paradis, M. (Eds.), The handbook of the neuroscience of multilingualism (pp. 313334). John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keysar, B., Hayakawa, S. L., & An, S. G. (2012). The foreign-language effect: Thinking in a foreign tongue reduces decision biases. Psychological Science, 23, 661668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Körner, A., Deutsch, R., & Gawronski, B. (2020). Using the CNI model to investigate individual differences in moral dilemma judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46, 13921407.Google ScholarPubMed
Li, P., Zhang, F., Yu, A., & Zhao, X. (2020). Language history questionnaire (LHQ3): An enhanced tool for assessing multilingual experience. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23, 938944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malle, B. F. (2021). Moral judgments. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 293318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marian, V., & Neisser, U. (2000). Language-dependent recall of autobiographical memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(3), 361368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mill, J. S. (1998). Utilitarianism. In Crisp, R. (Ed.), Utilitarianism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, S., & Nicoladis, E. (2020). It’s easier to kill a baby to save oneself than a fat man to save other people: The effect of moral dilemma and age on Russian-English bilinguals’ moral reasoning. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 110. doi: 10.1080/01434632.2020.1813145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miozzo, M., Navarrete, E., Ongis, M., Mello, E., Girotto, V., & Peressotti, F. (2020). Foreign language effect in decision-making: How foreign is it? Cognition, 199, 104245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moll, J., Zahn, R., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2005). The neural basis of human moral cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 799809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montrul, S. (2016). Dominance and proficiency in early and late bilingualism. In Silva-Corvalan, C., & Treffers-Daller, J. (Eds.), Language dominance in bilinguals: Issues of measurement and operationalization (pp. 1535). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Muda, R., Niszczota, P., Białek, M., & Conway, P. (2018). Reading dilemmas in a foreign language reduces both deontological and utilitarian response tendencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44, 321326.Google Scholar
Muda, R. P., Walker, A. C., Pieńkosz, D., Fugelsang, J. A., & Białek, M. (2020). Foreign language does not affect gambling-related judgments. Journal of Gambling Studies, 36, 633652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, S., & Mallon, R. (2006). Moral dilemmas and moral rules. Cognition, 100, 530542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Hara, R. E., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & Sinnott-Armstrong, N. A. (2010). Wording effects in moral judgments. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 547.Google Scholar
Ripley, B., Venables, B., Bates, D. M., Hornik, K., Gebhardt, A., Firth, D., & Ripley, M. B. (2013). Package ‘mass’. Cran r, 538, 113120.Google Scholar
Royzman, E. B., & Baron, J. (2002). The preference for indirect harm. Social Justice Research, 15(2), 165184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/Google Scholar
Schrauf, R. W., & Rubin, D. C. (2000). Internal languages of retrieval: The bilingual encoding of memories for the personal past. Memory & Cognition, 28(4), 616623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sloman, S. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 322.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174215.Google ScholarPubMed
Stankovic, M., Biedermann, B., & Hamamura, T. (2022). Not all bilinguals are the same: A meta-analysis of the moral foreign language effect. Brain and Language, 227, 105082.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sulpizio, S., Del Maschio, N., Del Mauro, G., Fedeli, D., & Abutalebi, J. (2020). Bilingualism as a gradient measure modulates functional connectivity of language and control networks. NeuroImage, 205, 116306.Google ScholarPubMed
Sulpizio, S., Del Maschio, N., Fedeli, D., & Abutalebi, J. (2020). Bilingual language processing: A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 108, 834853.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sulpizio, S., Toti, M., Del Maschio, N., Costa, A., Fedeli, D., Job, R., & Abutalebi, J. (2019). Are you really cursing? Neural processing of taboo words in native and foreign language. Brain and Language, 194, 8492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swann, W. B., Gómez, Á., Dovidio, J. F., Hart, S., & Jetten, . (2010). Dying and killing for one’s group: Identity fusion moderates responses to intergroup versions of the trolley problem. Psychological Science, 21, 11761183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, R. (1990). Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: a basic review. Journal of diagnostic medical sonography, 6(1), 3539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tassy, S., Oullier, O., Mancini, J., & Wicker, B. (2013). Discrepancies between judgment and choice of action in moral dilemmas. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ugazio, G., Lamm, C., & Singer, T. (2012). The role of emotions for moral judgments depends on the type of emotion and moral scenario. Emotion, 12, 579590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uhlmann, E. L., Pizarro, D. A., Tannenbaum, D., & Ditto, P. H. (2009). The motivated use of moral principles. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 476491.Google Scholar
Wong, G., & Ng, B. C. (2018). Moral judgement in early bilinguals: Language dominance influences responses to moral dilemmas. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1070.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Del Maschio et al. supplementary material

Del Maschio et al. supplementary material

Download Del Maschio et al. supplementary material(File)
File 92 KB

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Foreign to whom? Constraining the moral foreign language effect on bilinguals’ language experience
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Foreign to whom? Constraining the moral foreign language effect on bilinguals’ language experience
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Foreign to whom? Constraining the moral foreign language effect on bilinguals’ language experience
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *