Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-ktprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T23:10:47.082Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Classifiers augment and maintain shape-based categorization in Mandarin speakers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2014

Maria D. Sera ,
Kaitlin R. Johnson  and
Jenny Yichun Kuo
Maria D. Sera
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota. E-mail: sera@umn.edu
Kaitlin R. Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Jenny Yichun Kuo
Affiliation:
National Chiayi University, Taiwan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Past evidence suggests that adult Mandarin speakers rely on shape more heavily than English speakers when categorizing solid objects (Kuo and Sera 2009). In this experiment, we began to examine that effect developmentally by investigating the acquisition of the three most common Mandarin Chinese classifiers for solid objects (i.e. ge, zhi and tiao) in relation to development in shape-based categorization by native speakers of Mandarin and English from 3 years of age to adulthood. We found that 3-year-old Mandarin speakers were above chance in their classifier knowledge, but this knowledge continued to develop through 7 years of age. We also found that Mandarin speakers relied more heavily on shape than English speakers, and that shape-based categorization among English speakers tended to decline with age on the trials in which shape choices matched the Mandarin classifiers. The findings suggest that classifiers initially augment Mandarin speakers' attention to the shape of solid objects, and then maintain this early stronger shape bias after they are fully learned. The work highlights how categorization and word learning are graded and intertwined.

Keywords

classifierscategorizationshape-based categorizationdevelopmentMandarin Chineselanguage and cognition

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language and Cognition , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 1 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © UK Cognitive Linguistics Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allen, K. 1977. Classifier. Language 53(2). 285–311.Google Scholar
Baldwin, D. 1992. Clarifying the role of shape in children's taxonomic assumption. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 54(3). 392–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bogacz, R., Brown, E., Moehlis, J., Holmes, P. & Cohen, J. D.. 2006. The physics of optimal decision making: A formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. Psychological Review 113(4). 700–765.Google Scholar
Carey, S. 1985. Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Carey, S. 2009. The origin of concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, S. M. 1978. Variation in children's concepts by category and age. Educational Psychology 11. 105–112.Google Scholar
Cheng, L. & Sybesma, R.. 2005. Classifiers in four varieties of Chinese. In Cinque, G. & Kayne, R. S. (eds.), Handbook of comparative syntax, 259–292. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chiang, W. & Chiu, C.. 2006. Children's category structure and false memories. Psychologia 49(3). 178–192.Google Scholar
Chien, Y.-C., Lust, B. & Chiang, C.-P.. 2003. Chinese children's comprehension of count classifiers and mass-classifiers. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 12(2). 91–120.Google Scholar
Colunga, E. & Smith, L. B.. 2005. From the lexicon to expectations about kinds: A role for associative learning. Psychological Review 112(2). 347–382.Google Scholar
Davidoff, J., Davies, I. & Robeson, D.. 1999. Color categories in a stone-age tribe. Nature 398(6724). 203–204.Google Scholar
Erbaugh, M. S. 1986. Taking stock: The development of Chinese noun classifiers historically and in young children. In Craig, C. (ed.), Noun classes and categorization, 399–436. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Franklin, A., Clifford, A., Williamson, E. & Davies, I. R. L.. 2005. Color term knowledge does not affect categorical perception of color in toddlers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 90(2). 114–141.Google Scholar
Freeman, K. & Sera, M. D.. 1996. Reliance on visual and verbal information across ontological kinds: What do preschoolers know about animals and machines? Cognitive Development 11(3). 315–341.Google Scholar
Gelman, S. A. 2003. The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hermer-Vazquez, L., Spelke, E. & Katsnelson, A.. 1999. Sources of flexibility in human cognition: Dual-task studies of space and language. Cognitive Psychology 39(1). 3–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, C. M. 1898. On choice. American Journal of Psychology 9. 587–590.Google Scholar
Hu, Q. 1993. Overextension of animacy in Chinese classifier acquisition. In Clark, E. (ed.), The Proceedings of the Twenty-fifth Annual Child Language Research Forum, 127–136. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Huang, C. & Ahrens, K.. 2003. Individuals, kinds, and events: Classifier coercion of nouns. Language Sciences 25(4). 353–373.Google Scholar
Imai, M. & Gentner, D.. 1997. A crosslinguistic study of early word-learning universal ontology and linguistic influence. Cognition 62(2). 169–200.Google Scholar
Imai, M., Saalbach, H. & Stern, E.. 2010. Are Chinese and German children taxonomic, thematic, or shape biased? Influence of classifiers and cultural contexts. Frontiers in Psychology 1(194). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inagaki, K. & Hatano, G.. 2006. Young children's conception of the biological world. Current Directions in Psychological Science 15(4). 177–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inhelder, B. & Piaget, J.. 1964. The early growth of logic in the child: Classification and seriation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keil, F. C. 1983. On the emergence of semantic and conceptual distinctions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 112(3). 357–389.Google Scholar
Kelemen, D. & Carey, S.. 2007. The essence of artifacts: Developing the design stance. In Laurence, S. & Margolis, E. (eds.), Creations of the mind: Theories of artifacts and their representation, 212–230. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuo, J. Y. & Sera, M. D.. 2009. Classifier effects on human categorization: The role of shape classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 18(1). 1–19.Google Scholar
Levine, S. C. & Carey, S.. 1982. Up front: The acquisition of a concept and a word. Journal of Child Language 9 (1982). 645–657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levinson, S. C. 2003. Language in mind: Let's get the issues straight! In Gentner, D. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought, 113–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Li, P., Dulham, Y. & Carey, S.. 2009. Of substance: The nature of language effects on entity construal. Cognitive Psychology 58(4). 487–524.Google Scholar
Li, P., Huang, B. & Hsiao, Y.. 2010. Learning that classifiers count: Mandarin-speaking children's acquisition of sortal and mensural classifiers. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 19(3). 207–230.Google Scholar
Lindeman, M. & Saher, M.. 2007. Vitalism, purpose and superstition. British Journal of Psychology 98(1). 33–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loke, K. 1994. Is GE merely a general classifier? Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 29(3). 35–50.Google Scholar
Lucy, J. 1992. Grammatical categories and cognition: A case study of the linguistic relativity hypothesis. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lucy, J. & Gaskins, S.. 2003. Interaction of language type and referent type in the development of nonverbal classification preferences. In Gentner, D. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (eds.), Language and mind: Advances in the study of language and thought, 465–492. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Martin, A. & Sera, M.. 2006. The acquisition of spatial constructions in American Sign Language and English. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 11(4). 391–402.Google Scholar
Mash, C. 2006. Multidimensional shape similarity in the development of visual object classification. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 95(2). 128–152.Google Scholar
Morris, S. C., Taplin, J. E. & Gelman, S. A.. 2000. Vitalism in naive biological thinking. Developmental Psychology 36(5). 582–595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, K. 1974. Variation in children's concepts by age and category. Child Development 45(3). 577–584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Özgen, E. 2004. Language, learning, and color perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science 13(3). 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. 1929. The child's conception of the world. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Pica, P., Lemer, C., Izard, V. & Dehaene, S.. 2004. Exact and approximate arithmetic in an Amazonian Indigene Group. Science 306(5695). 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberson, D., Davidoff, J., Davies, I. & Shapiro, L. R.. 2004. The development of color categories in two languages: A longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Psychology 133(4). 554–571.Google Scholar
Roberson, D., Davies, I. & Davidoff, J.. 2000. Color categories are not universal: Replications and new evidence from a stone-age culture. Journal of Experimental Psychology 129(3). 369–398.Google Scholar
Saalbach, H. & Imai, M.. 2007. The scope of linguistic influence: Does a classifier system alter object concepts? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136(3). 485–501.Google Scholar
Samuelson, L. K. & Smith, L. B.. 1999. Early noun vocabularies: Do ontology, category structure and syntax correspond? Cognition 73(1). 1–33.Google Scholar
Sarnecka, B. W. & Carey, S.. 2008. How counting represents number: What children must learn and when they learn it. Cognition 108(3). 662–674.Google Scholar
Scherf, K. S., Behrmann, M., Kimchi, R. & Luna, B.. 2009. Emergence of global shape processing continues through adolescence. Child Development 80(1). 162–177.Google Scholar
Schmitt, B. & Zhang, S.. 1998. Language structure and categorization: A study of classifiers in consumer cognition, judgment, and choice. Journal of Consumer Research 25(2). 108–122.Google Scholar
Sera, M., Elieff, C., Forbes, J., Burch, M., Rodríguez, W. & Poulin-Dubois, D.. 2002. When language affects cognition and when it does not: An analysis of grammatical gender and classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 131(3). 377–397.Google Scholar
Sera, M. D. & Millett, K. G.. 2011. Developmental differences in shape processing. Cognitive Development 26(1). 40–56.Google Scholar
Sera, M. D., Soh, H. L., Fuller, J. W., Stevens, J., Batteen, C., Li, D., Kuo, J. Y. & Davis, N.. 2010. How do classifiers group nouns for solid objects in Hmong, Japanese and Mandarin Chinese? Manuscript under revision.Google Scholar
Smith, L. B. 1984. Young children's understanding of attributes and dimensions: A comparison of conceptual and linguistic measures. Child Development 55(2). 363–380.Google Scholar
Smith, L. B. 1995. Self-organizing processes in learning to learn words: Development is not induction. The Minnesota symposium on child psychology: Basic and applied perspectives on learning, cognition, and development 28. 1–32.Google Scholar
Smith, P. L. & Ratcliff, R.. 2004. Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions. Trends in Neuroscience 27(3). 161–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tai, J. 1994. Chinese classifier systems and human categorization. In Chen, M. & Tseng, O. (eds.), In honor of William S-Y. Wang: Interdisciplinary studies of language and language change, 479–494. Taipei, Taiwan, ROC: Pyramid.Google Scholar
Tai, J. H. & Wang, L.. 1990. A semantic study of the classifier tiao. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 25(1). 35–56.Google Scholar
Tien, Y.-M., Tzeng, O. J. L. & Hung, D. L.. 2002. Semantic and cognitive basis of Chinese classifiers: A functional approach. Language and Linguistics 3(1). 101–132.Google Scholar
Tsai, I. Y. 2008. Acquisition of Mandarin classifiers and categorization in young children. Master's thesis, National Chiayi University, Taiwan.Google Scholar
Waxman, S. R. & Gelman, S.. 2010. Different kinds of concepts and different kinds of words: What words do for human cognition. In Mareschal, D., Quinn, P. & Lear, S. (eds.), The making of human concepts, 99–130. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, K. 2005. The acquisition of numeral classifiers: The case of Japanese children. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Yoshida, H. & Smith, L. B.. 2003. Shifting ontological boundaries: How Japanese- and English-speaking children generalize names for animals and artifacts. Developmental Science 6(1). 1–17.Google Scholar
Zhang, N. N. 2011. Numeral classifier structures. Unpublished monograph. National Chung Cheng University, Taiwan.Google Scholar
Zhang, S. & Schmitt, B.. 1998. Language-dependent classification: The mental representation of classifiers in cognition, memory, and ad evaluations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 4(4). 375–385.Google Scholar