Skip to main content Accessibility help

Disembodying cognition

  • Anjan Chatterjee (a1)


The idea that concepts are embodied by our motor and sensory systems is popular in current theorizing about cognition. Embodied cognition accounts come in different versions and are often contrasted with a purely symbolic amodal view of cognition. Simulation, or the hypothesis that concepts simulate the sensory and motor experience of real world encounters with instances of those concepts, has been prominent in psychology and cognitive neuroscience. Here, with a focus on spatial thought and language, I review some of the evidence cited in support of simulation versions of embodied cognition accounts. While these data are extremely interesting and many of the experiments are elegant, knowing how to best interpret the results is often far from clear. I point out that a quick acceptance of embodied accounts runs the danger of ignoring alternate hypotheses and not scrutinizing neuroscience data critically. I also review recent work from my lab that raises questions about the nature of sensory motor grounding in spatial thought and language. In my view, the question of whether or not cognition is grounded is more fruitfully replaced by questions about gradations in this grounding. A focus on disembodying cognition, or on graded grounding, opens the way to think about how humans abstract. Within neuroscience, I propose that three functional anatomic axes help frame questions about the graded nature of grounded cognition. First, are questions of laterality differences. Do association cortices in both hemispheres instantiate the same kind of sensory or motor information? Second, are questions about ventral dorsal axes. Do neuronal ensembles along this axis shift from conceptual representations of objects to the relationships between objects? Third, are questions about gradients centripetally from sensory and motor cortices towards and within perisylvian cortices. How does sensory and perceptual information become more language-like and then get transformed into language proper?


Corresponding author

Correspondence addresses: Anjan Chatterjee, Department of Neurology and the Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, 3 West Gates, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. E-mail:


Hide All
Altmann, L. J. P., Saleem, A., Kendall, D., Heilman, K. M. & Rothi, L. J. G.. 2006. Orthographic directionality and thematic role illustration in English and Arabic. Brain and Language 97(3). 306316.
Amorapanth, P. X., Widick, P. & Chatterjee, A.. In press. The neural basis for spatial relations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
Barsalou, L. W. 1999. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22. 577660.
Barsalou, L. W. 2005. Abstraction as dynamic interpretation in perceptual symbol systems. In Gershkoff-Stowe, L. & Rakison, D. (eds.), Building object categories in developmental time, 389431. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Barsalou, L. W. 2007. Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59(1). 617645.
Bates, E., Wilson, S. M., Saygin, A. P., Dick, F., Sereno, M. I., Knight, R. T. & Dronkers, N. F.. 2003. Voxel-based lesion symptom mapping. Nature Neuroscience 6. 448450.
Bedny, M., Caramazza, A., Grossman, E., Pascual-Leone, A. & Saxe, R.. 2008. Concepts are more than percepts: The case of action verbs. Journal of Neuroscience 28(44). 1134711353.
Beeman, M. & Chiarello, C. (eds.). 1998. Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Beilock, S. L., Lyons, I. M., Mattarella-Micke, A., Nusbaum, H. C. & Small, S. L.. 2008. Sports experience changes the neural processing of action language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105. 1326913273.
Berndt, R. S., Mitchum, C. C., Haendiges, A. N. & Sandson, J.. 1997. Verb retrieval in aphasia: 2. Relationship to sentence processing. Brain and Language 56. 107137.
Berndt, R. S., Haendiges, A. N., Mitchum, C. C. & Sandson, J.. 1997. Verb retrieval in aphasia: 1. Characterizing single word impairments. Brain and Language 56. 68106.
Binder, J. R., Westbury, C. F., McKiernan, K. A., Possing, E. T. & Medler, D. A.. 2005. Distinct brain systems for processing concrete and abstract concepts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17. 905917.
Borghi, A. M., Glenberg, A. M. & Kaschak, M. P.. 2004. Putting words in perspective. Memory and Cognition 32(6). 863873.
Bornkessel, I., Zysset, S., Friederici, A. D., von Cramon, D. Y. & Schlesewsky, M.. 2005. Who did what to whom? The neural basis of argument hierarchies during language comprehension. Neuroimage 26(1). 221233.
Bowerman, M. & Choi, S.. 2001. Shaping meanings for language: Universal and language-specific in the acquisition of spatial semantic categories. In Bowerman, M. & Levinson, S. C. (eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development, 475511. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bub, D. N., Masson, M. E. J. & Cree, G. S.. 2008. Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words. Cognition 106(1). 2758.
Buccino, G., Lui, F., Canessa, N., Patteri, I., Lagravinese, G., Benuzzi, F., Porro, C. A. & Rizzolatti, G.. 2004. Neural circuits involved in the recognition of actions performed by non-conspecifics: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16. 114126.
Buccino, G., Riggio, L., Melli, G., Binkofski, F., Gallese, V. & Rizzolatti, G.. 2005. Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: A combined TMS and behavioral study. Cognitive Brain Research 24(3). 355363.
Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D. E. & Grezes, J.. 2005. Action observation and acquired motor skills: An fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex 15. 12431249.
Caplan, D. 1995. Issues arising in contemporary studies of disorders of syntactic processing in sentence comprehension in agrammatic patients. Brain and Language 50. 325338.
Cappa, S. F., Binetti, G., Pezzini, A., Padovani, A., Rozzini, L. & Trabucchi, M.. 1998. Object and action naming in Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 50. 351355.
Caramazza, A. & Miceli, G.. 1991. Selective impairment of thematic role assignment in sentence processing. Brain and Language 41. 402436.
Cattaneo, L. & Rizzolatti, G.. 2009. The mirror neuron system. Archives of Neurology 56. 557560.
Chatterjee, A. 2001. Language and space: Some interactions. Trends in Cognitive Science 5. 5561.
Chatterjee, A. 2005. A madness to the methods in cognitive neuroscience? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17. 847849.
Chatterjee, A. 2008. The neural organization of spatial thought and language. Seminars in Speech and Language 29. 226238.
Chatterjee, A. & Maher, L.. 2000. Grammar and agrammatism. In Gonzalez-Rothi, L., Crosson, B. & Nadeau, S. (eds.), Aphasia and language: Theory to practice, 133156. New York: Guilford Press.
Chatterjee, A., Maher, L. M., Gonzalez-Rothi, L. J. & Heilman, K. M.. 1995. Asyntactic thematic role assignment: The use of a temporal-spatial strategy. Brain and Language 49. 125139.
Chatterjee, A., Maher, L. M. & Heilman, K. M.. 1995. Spatial characteristics of thematic role representation. Neuropsychologia 33. 643648.
Chatterjee, A., Southwood, M. H. & Basilico, D.. 1999. Verbs, events and spatial representations. Neuropsychologia. 395402.
Chen, E., Widick, P. & Chatterjee, A.. 2008. Functional-anatomical organization of predicate metaphor processing. Brain and Language 107(3). 194202.
Chokron, S. & Agostini, M. De. 2002. The influence of handedness on profile and line drawing directionality in children, young, and older normal adults. Brain and Cognition 48. 333336.
Clark, A. 1999. An embodied cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3(9). 345351.
Damasio, A. 1989. Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: A system level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition 33. 2562.
Damasio, H., Grabowski, T. J., Tranel, D., Ponto, L. L., Hichwa, R. D. & Damasio, A. R.. 2001. Neural correlates of naming actions and of naming spatial relations. Neuroimage 13 (6.1). 10531064.
Decety, J., Grezes, J., Costes, N., Perani, D., Jeannerod, M., Procyk, E., Grassi, F. & Fazio, F.. 1997. Brain activity during observation of actions. Influence of action content and subject strategy. Brain 120. 17631777.
Dehaene, S., Bossini, S. & Giraux, P.. 1993. The mental representation of parity and number magnitide. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 122. 371396.
Dove, G. 2009. Beyond perceptual symbols: A call for representational pluralism. Cognition.
Emmorey, K., Damasio, H., McCullough, S., Grabowski, T., Ponto, L. L., Hichwa, R. D. & Bellugi, U.. 2002. Neural systems underlying spatial language in American Sign Language. Neuroimage 17(2). 812824.
Epstein, R. & Kanwisher, N.. 1998. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 392. 598601.
Farah, M. J. 1990. Visual agnosia. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Fiez, J. A., Raichle, M. E., Balota, D. A., Tallal, P. & Petersen, S. E.. 1996. PET activation of posterior temporal regions during auditory word presentation and verb generation. Cerebral Cortex 6(1). 110.
Fischer, M. H. & Zwaan, R. A.. 2008. Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61(6). 825850.
Fogassi, L., Ferrari, P. F., Gesierich, B., Rozzi, S., Chersi, F. & Rizzolatti, G.. 2005. Parietal lobe: From action organization to intention understanding. Science 308(5722). 662667.
Frederici, A. 1982. Syntactic and semantic processing in aphasic deficits: The availability of prepositions. Brain and Language 15. 249258.
Gennari, S., Sloman, S. A., Malt, B. C. & Fitch, W.. 2002. Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition 83. 4979.
Gentner, D. 1988. Metaphor as structure mapping: The relational shift. Child Development 59. 4759.
Gentner, D. 2003. Why we're so smart. In Gentner, D. & Goldin-Meadows, S. (eds.), Language in Mind, 195235. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Gentner, D. & Loewenstein, J.. 2002. Relational language and relational thought. In Byrnes, J. & Amsel, E. (eds.), Language, literacy and cognitive development, 87120. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gentner, D. & Stevens, A. L.. 1983. Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Geschwind, N. 1965. Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. Brain 88. 237–294, 585644.
Gibbs, R. W. 1996. Why many concepts are metaphorical. Cognition 61. 309319.
Gibbs, R. W., Lima, P. L. Costa & Francozo, E.. 2004. Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics 36(7). 11891210.
Glenberg, A. M. & Kaschak, M. P.. 2002. Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.
Glenberg, A. M. & Robertson, D.. 2000. Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language 43. 379401.
Glenberg, A. M., Sato, M. & Cattaneo, L.. 2008. Use-induced motor plasticity afects the processing of abstract and concrete language. Current Biology 18(7). R290R291.
Glover, S., Rosenbaum, D., Graham, J. & Dixon, P.. 2004. Grasping the meaning of words. Experimental Brain Research 154(1). 103108.
Goldenberg, G. 2003. Apraxia and beyond: Life and work of Hugo Liepmann. Cortex 39(3). 509524.
Grezes, J., Fonlupt, P., Bertenthal, B., Chantal, D.-M., Segebarth, C. & Decety, J.. 2001. Does perception of biological motion rely on specific brain regions? Neuroimage 13. 775785.
Grill-Spector, K. & Malach, R.. 2001. fMRI adaptation: A tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. Acta Psychologica 107. 293321.
Grodzinsky, Y. 1988. Syntactic representations in agrammatic aphasia: The case of prepositions. Language and Speech 31. 115134.
Grossman, E. D. & Blake, R.. 2002. Brain areas active during visual perception of biological motion. Neuron 35. 11671175.
Grossman, M. 1998. Not all words are created equal: Category-specific deficits in central nervous system disease. Neurology 50. 324325.
Grossman, M., Anderson, C., Khan, A., Avants, B., Elman, L. & McCluskey, L.. 2008. Impaired action knowledge in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology 71(18). 13961401.
Hayward, W. G. & Tarr, M. J.. 1995. Spatial language and spatial representation. Cognition 55. 3984.
Jackendof, R. 1987. On beyond zebra: The relation of linguistic and visual information. Cognition 26. 89114.
Jackendof, R. 1996. The architecture of the linguistic-spatial interface. In Bloom, P., Peterson, M. A., Nadel, L. & Garrett, M. F. (eds.), Language and space, 130. Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press.
Jackson, J. 1932. Selected writings of John Hughlings Jackson. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Johnson, M. 1987. The body in mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Johnson-Frey, S. H. 2004. The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(2). 7178.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1996. Space to think. In Bloom, P., Peterson, M. A., Nadel, L. & Garrett, M. F. (eds.), Language and space, 437462. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. 2004. The history of mental models. In Manktelow, K. & Chung, M. C. (eds.), Psychology of reasoning: Theoretical and historical perspectives, 179212. New York: Psychology Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. 2006. How we reason. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kable, J. W. & Chatterjee, A.. 2006. The specificity of action representations in lateral occipitotemporal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18. 14981517.
Kable, J. W., Kan, I., Wilson, A., Thompson-Schill, S. & Chatterjee, A.. 2005. Conceptual representations of action in lateral temporal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17. 18551870.
Kable, J. W., Lease-Spellmeyer, J. & Chatterjee, A.. 2002. Neural substrates of action event knowledge. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14. 795804.
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J. & Chun, M.. 1997. The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for perception of faces. Journal of Neuroscience 17. 43024311.
Kanwisher, N., Woods, R. P., Iacoboni, M. & Mazziotta, J. C.. 1997. A locus in human extrastriate cortex for visual shape analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9. 33142.
Kaschak, M. P., Jones, J. L., Coyle, J. M. & Sell, A.. 2009. Language and body. In Wagner, R. K., Schatschneider, C. & Phythian-Sence, C. (eds.), Beyond decoding: The behavioral and biological foundations of reading comprehension, 326. New York: The Guilford Press.
Kaschak, M. P., Madden, C. J. & Therriault, D. J.. 2005. Perception of motion afects language processing. Cognition 94. 7989.
Kegl, J. 1995. Levels of representation and units of access relevant to agrammatism. Brain and Language 50. 151200.
Kemmerer, D. 2006. The semantics of space: Integrating linguistic typology and cognitive neuroscience. Neuropsychologia 44. 16071621.
Kemmerer, D., Castillo, J. G., Talavage, T., Patterson, S. & Wiley, C.. 2008. Neuroanatomical distribution of five semantic components of verbs: Evidence from fMRI. Brain and Language 107(1). 1643.
Kemmerer, D. & Gonzalez-Castillo, J.. In press. The two-level theory of verb meaning: An approach to integrating the semantics of action with the mirro neuron system. Brain and Language.
Kiehl, K. A., Liddle, P. F., Smith, A. M., Mendrek, A., Forster, B. B. & Hare, R. D.. 1999. Neural pathways involved in the processing of concrete and abstract words. Human Brain Mapping 7. 225233.
Kinsbourne, M. 1987. Mechanisms of unilateral neglect. In Jeannerod, M. (ed.), Neurophy-siological and neuropsychological aspects of spatial neglect, 6986. New York: North-Holland.
Kourtzi, Z. & Kanwisher, N.. 2000. Activation in human MT/MST by static images with implied motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12. 4855.
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. 1990. The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics 1. 3974.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M.. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Landau, B. & Jackendoff, R.. 1993. ‘What’ and ‘where’ in spatial language and spatial cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16. 217265.
Levinson, S. C. 1996. Language and space. Annual Review of Anthropology 25. 353382.
Li, Y., Hooser, S. D. Van, Mazurek, M., White, L. E. & Fitzpatrick, D.. 2008. Experience with moving visual stimuli drives the early development of cortical direction selectivity. Nature 456(7224). 952956.
Liepmann, H. 1908. Drei Aufsätze aus dem Apraxiegebiet. Berlin: Karger.
Lissauer, H. 1890. Ein Fall von Seelenblindheit Nebst Einem Beitrage zur Theori derselben. Archiv fur Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten 21. 222270.
Lyons, I. M., Mattarella-Micke, A., Cieslak, M., Nusbaum, H. C., Small, S. L. & Beilock, S. L.. In press. The role of personal experience in the neural processing of action-related language. Brain and Language.
Maass, A., Pagani, D. & Berta, E.. 2007. How beautiful is the goal and how violent is the fistfight? Spatial bias in the interpretation of human behavior. Social Cognition 25(6). 833852.
Maass, A. & Russo, A.. 2003. Directional bias in the mental representation of spatial events: Nature or culture? Psychological Science 14. 296301.
Maher, L., Chatterjee, A., Gonzalez-Rothi, L. & Heilman, K.. 1995. Agrammatic sentence production: The use of a temporal-spatial strategy. Brain and Language 49. 105124.
Mahon, B. Z. & Caramazza, A.. 2008. A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology-Paris 102. 5970.
Malach, R., Reppas, J., Benson, R., Kwong, K., Jiang, H., Kennedy, W., Ledden, P., Brady, T., Rosen, B. & Tootell, R.. 1995. Object related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 92. 81358139.
Mandler, J. M. 2004. The foundations of mind: Origins of conceptual thought. New York: Oxford University Press.
Marshall, J., Chiat, S. & Pring, T.. 1998. Verb retrieval and sentence production in aphasia. Brain and Language 63. 159183.
Martin, A., Haxby, J. V., Lalonde, F. M., Wiggs, C. L. & Ungerleider, L. G.. 1995. Discrete cortical regions associated with knowledge of color and knowledge of action. Science 270. 102105.
Martin, A., Ungerleider, L. & Haxby, J.. 2000. The sensory/motor model of semantic representation of objects. In Gazzaniga, M. (ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences, 10231036. 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Martin, A. & Weisberg, J.. 2003. Neural foundations for understanding social and mechanical concepts. Cognitive Neuropsychology 20. 575587.
Matlock, T. 2004. Fictive motion as cognitive simulation. Memory andCognition 32. 13891400.
Mesulam, M.-M. 1998. From sensation to cognition. Brain 121. 10131052.
Meteyard, L., Bahrami, B. & Vigliocco, G.. 2007. Motion detection and motion verbs. Psychological Science. 18(11). 10071013.
Meteyard, L., Zokaei, N., Bahrami, B. & Vigliocco, G.. 2008. Visual motion interferes with lexical decision on motion words. Current Biology 18(17). R732R733.
Miceli, G., Silveri, M. C., Villa, G. & Caramazza, A.. 1984. On the basis for the agrammatics difficulty in producing main verbs. Cortex 20. 207220.
Moro, V., Urgesi, C., Pernigo, S., Lanteri, P., Pazzaglia, M. & Aglioti, S. M.. 2008. The neural basis of body form and body action agnosia. Neuron 60(2). 235246.
Murphy, G. L. 1996. On metaphoric representation. Cognition 60. 173204.
Nachson, I., Argaman, E. & Luria, A.. 1999. Effects of directional habits and handedness on aesthetic preference for left and right profiles. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 30. 106114.
Negri, G. A. L., Rumiati, R. I., Zadini, A., Ukmar, M., Mahon, B. Z. & Caramazza, A.. 2007. What is the role of motor simulation in action and object recognition? Evidence from apraxia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 24(8). 795816.
Neininger, B. & Pulvermüller, F.. 2003. Word-category specific deficits after lesions in the right hemisphere. Neuropsychologia 41(1). 5370.
Oram, M. W. & Perrett, D. I.. 1994. Responses of anterior superior temporal polysensory (STPa) neurons to ‘biological motion’ stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 6. 99116.
Padakannaya, P., Devi, M. L., Zaveria, B., Chengappa, S. K. & Vaid, J.. 2002. Directional scanning efect and strength of reading habit in picture naming and recall. Brain and Cognition 48. 404490.
Paivio, A. 1990. Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Papafragou, A., Massey, C. & Gleitman, L.. 2002. Shake, rattle, ‘n’ roll: The representation of motion in language and cognition. Cognition 84. 189212.
Pazzaglia, M., Smania, N., Corato, E. & Aglioti, S. M.. 2008. Neural underpinnings of gesture discrimination in patients with limb apraxia. Journal of Neuroscience 28(12). 30303041.
Peelen, M. V. & Downing, P. E.. 2007. The neural basis of visual body perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8(8). 636648.
Perani, D., Cappa, S., Schnur, M., Tettamanti, M., Collina, S. & Rosa, M.. 1999. The neural correlates of verb and noun processing: A PET study. Brain 122. 23372344.
Pirog Revill, K., Aslin, R. N., Tanenhaus, M. K. & Bavelier, D.. 2008. Neural correlates of partial lexical activation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(35). 1311113115.
Posner, M. 1986. Chronometric explorations of mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pruden, S. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Maguire, M. J. & Meyer, M. A.. 2004. Foundations ofverb learning: Infants form categories of path and manner in motion events. In Brugos, A., Micciulla, L. & Smith, C. E. (eds.), Proceedings of the 28th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 461472. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Pulvermüller, F., Hauk, O. & Nikulin, V. V.. 2005. Functional links between motor and language systems. European Journal of Neuroscience 21. 793797.
Rapp, A. M., Leube, D. T., Grodd, W. & Kircher, T. T. J.. 2004. Neural correlates of metaphor processing. Cognitive Brain Research 20. 395402.
Regier, T. 1995. A model of human capacity for categorizing spatial relations. Cognitive Linguistics 6. 6388.
Richardson, D., Spivey, M., Barsalou, L. & McRae, K.. 2003. Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive science 27. 768780.
Rizzolatti, G. & Craighero, L.. 2004. The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuro-science 27. 169192.
Rothi, L. J. G., Ochipa, C. & Heilman, K. M.. 1991. A cognitive neuropsychological model of limb praxis. Cognitive Neuropsychology 8(6). 443458.
Saffran, E. M., Schwartz, M. F. & Marin, O. S. M.. 1980. The word order problem in agrammatism. II. Production. Brain and Language 10. 263280.
Saygin, A. P., McCullough, S., Alac, M. & Emmorey, K.. In press. Modulation of BOLD response in motion-sensitive lateral temporal cortex by real and fictive motion sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
Schmidt, G. L., Kranjec, A., Cardillo, E. R. & Chatterjee, A.. In press. Beyond laterality: A critical assessment of research on the neural basis of metaphor. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.
Schwartz, M. F., Saffran, E. M. & Marin, O. S. M.. 1980. The word order problem in agram-matism. I. Comprehension. Brain and Language 10. 249262.
Serino, A., Filippo, L. De, Casavecchia, C., Coccia, M., Shiffrar, M. & Ladavas, E.. 2009. Lesions to the motor system afect action perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 22(3). 413426.
Shapiro, L. P. & Levine, B. A.. 1990. Verb processing during sentence comprehension in aphasia. Brain Language 38. 2147.
Shetreet, E., Palti, D. & Friedmann, N., Hadar, U.. 2007. Cortical representation of verb processing in sentence comprehension: Number of complements, subcategorization, and thematic frames. Cerebral Cortex 17(8). 19581969.
Shulman, G. L., Ollinger, J. M., Akbudak, E., Conturo, T. E., Snyder, A. Z., Petersen, S. E. & Corbetta, M.. 1999. Areas involved in encoding and applying directional expectations to moving objects. The Journal of Neuroscience 19. 94809496.
Simmons, W. K. & Barsalou, L. W.. 2003. The similarity-in-topography principle: Reconciling theories of conceptual deficits. Cognitive Neuropsychology 20. 451486.
Simons, J. S., Koutstaal, W., Prince, S., Wagner, A. D. & Schacter, D. L.. 2003. Neural mechanisms of visual object priming: Evidence for perceptual and semantic distinctions in fusiform cortex. NeuroImage 19. 613626.
Stanfield, R. & Zwaan, R.. 2001. The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science 12. 153156.
Sweetser, E. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: The mind-body metaphor in semantic structure and semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Symes, E., Ellis, R. & Tucker, M.. 2007. Visual object affordances: Object orientation. Acta Psychologica 124(2). 238255.
Talmy, L. 1983. How language structures space. In Pick, H. & Acredolo, L. (eds.), Spatial orientation: Theory, research and application, 225282. New York: Plenum Press.
Talmy, L. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Shopen, T. (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 57149. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Talmy, L. 1996. Fictive motion in language and ‘ception’. In Bloom, P., Peterson, M., Nadel, L. & Garrett, M. (eds.), Language and space, 211276. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Talmy, L. 2000. Towards a cognitive semantics: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Talmy, L. In press. Cognitive semantics: An overview. In Maienborn, C., von Heusinger, K. & Portner, P. (eds.), Handbook of semantics. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M. & Sedivy, J. C.. 1995. Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 268. 16321634.
Taylor, L. J. & Zwaan, R. A.. 2009. Action in cognition: The case of language. Language and Cognition 1(1). 4558.
Tettamanti, M., Buccino, G., Saccuman, M., Gallese, V., Danna, M., Scifo, P., Fazio, F., Rizzolatti, G., Cappa, S. F. & Perani, D.. 2005. Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17(2). 273281.
Tranel, D. & Kemmerer, D.. 2004. Neuroanatomical correlates of locative prepositions. Cognitive Neuropsychology 21. 719749.
Tucker, M. & Ellis, R.. 2004. Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychologica 116(2). 185203.
Tversky, B., Kugelmass, S. & Winter, A.. 1991. Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology 23. 515557.
Urgesi, C., Moro, V., Candidi, M. & Aglioti, S. M.. 2006. Mapping implied body actions in the human motor system. Journal of Neuroscience 26(30). 79427949.
Vaid, J., Singh, M., Sakhuja, T. & Gupta, G. C.. 2002. Stroke direction asymmetry in figure drawing: Influence of handedness and reading/writing habits. Brain and Cognition 48. 597602.
Wallentin, M., Ostergaard, S., Lund, T., Ostergaard, L. & Roepstorff, A.. 2005. Concrete spatial language: See what I mean? Brain and Language 92. 221233.
Warburton, E., Wise, R. J. S., Price, C. J., Weiller, C., Hadar, U., Ramsay, S. & Frackowiak, R. S. J.. 1996. Noun and verb retrieval by normal subjects. Studies with PET. Brain 119. 159179.
Warrington, E. K. & Shallice, T.. 1984. Category specific semantic impairments. Brain 107. 829854.
Weliky, M., Bosking, W. H. & Fitzpatrick, D.. 1996. A systematic map of direction preference in primary visual cortex. Nature 379(6567). 725728.
Wilson, M. 2002. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9(4). 625636.
Wise, R. J., Howard, D., Mummery, C. J., Fletcher, P., Lef, A., Buchel, C. & Scott, S. K.. 2000. Noun imageability and the temporal lobes. Neuropsychologia 38. 985994.
Wu, D. H., Morganti, A. & Chatterjee, A.. 2008. Neural substrates of processing path and manner information of a moving event. Neuropsychologia 46. 704713.
Wu, D. H., Waller, S. & Chatterjee, A.. 2007. The functional neuroanatomy of thematic role and locative relational knowledge. The Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19. 15421555.
Zingeser, L. B. & Berndt, R. S.. 1990. Retrieval of nouns and verbs in agrammatism and anomia. Brain and Language 39. 1432.
Zwaan, R. A. & Taylor, L. J.. 2006. Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General 135. 111.


Disembodying cognition

  • Anjan Chatterjee (a1)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed