Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Long-distance dependencies without filler−gaps: a cognitive-functional alternative in Fluid Construction Grammar*


Long-distance dependencies are notoriously difficult to analyze in a formally explicit way because they involve constituents that seem to have been extracted from their canonical position in an utterance. The most widespread solution is to identify a gap at an extraction site and to communicate information about that gap to its filler, as in What_FILLERdid you see_GAP? This paper rejects the filler−gap solution and proposes a cognitive-functional alternative in which long-distance dependencies spontaneously emerge as a side effect of how grammatical constructions interact with each other for expressing different conceptualizations. The proposal is supported by a computational implementation in Fluid Construction Grammar that works for both parsing and production.

Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Sony Computer Science Laboratory Paris, 6, Rue Amyot, 75005 Paris, France. e-mail:
Hide All

While this paper was undergoing review, I learned the sad news of Ivan Sag’s passing away. His contributions to the field can hardly be overestimated, and it is with the utmost respect for his work that I disagree with his analysis of long-distance dependencies. The research reported in this paper has been conducted at and funded by the Sony Computer Science Laboratory Paris. I would like to thank Luc Steels, director of Sony CSL Paris, for his feedback and support. I also thank Pieter Wellens from the VUB AI-Lab for his recent additions to FCG that have made this implementation possible. I also thank Frank Richter (University of Tübingen) and Stefan Müller (Free University of Berlin) for helping me to better understand HPSG. Finally, I would like to thank the editors and reviewers of Language and Cognition for their efforts that have helped to improve this paper. All remaining errors are of course my own.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Artemis Alexiadou , Tibor Kiss , & Gereon Müller (Eds.) (2012). Local Modelling of Non-Local Dependencies in Syntax (Linguistische Arbeiten 547). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Gosse Bouma , Rob Malouf , & Ivan A Sag . (2001). Satisfying constraints on extraction and adjunction. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 19 (1), 165.

Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng , & Norbert Corver (Eds.) (2006). WH-movement: moving on. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

William Croft (2005). Logical and typological arguments for Radical Construction Grammar. In Jan-Ola Östman , & Mirjam Fried (Eds.), Construction grammars: cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (pp. 273314). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ewa Dabrowska (2008). Questions with long-distance dependencies: a usage-based perspective. Cognitive Linguistics, 19 (3), 391425.

Vera Demberg , & Frank Keller (2008). Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity. Cognition, 109 (2), 193210.

Matthew S Dryer . (1997). Are grammatical relations universals? In Joan L. Bybee John Haiman , & Sandra A. Thompson (Eds.), Essays on language function and language type: dedicated to T. Givón (pp. 115143). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Edward Gibson (1998). Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 176.

Jonathan Ginzburg , and Ivan A Sag . (2000). Interrogative investigations: the form, the meaning, and use of English interrogatives. Stanford: CSLI Publications.

Adele E Goldberg . (2002). Surface generalizations: an alternative to alternations. Cognitive Linguistics, 13 (4), 327356.

John Hale (2003). The information conveyed by words in sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32 (2), 101123.

Martin Haspelmath (2007). Pre-established categories don’t exist: consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology, 11 (1), 119132.

Martin Haspelmath (2010). Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language, 86 (3), 663687.

Richard Hudson (1997). The rise of auxiliary DO – verb raising or category-strengtehning? Transactions of the Philological Society, 95 (1), 4172.

Paul Kay , & Charles J Fillmore . (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: the What’s X doing Y? construction. Language, 75 (1), 133.

Kevin Knight (1989). Unification: a multidisciplinary survey. ACM Computer Surveys, 21 (1), 93124.

Knud Lambrecht (1994). Information structure and sentence form: topic, focus, and the mental representation of discourse referents (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Roger Levy (2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition, 106 (3), 11261177.

Stefan Müller (2006). Phrasal or lexical constructions? Language, 82 (4), 850883.

Jan Nuyts (2011). Pattern versus process concepts of grammar and mind: a cognitive-functional perspective. In Mario Brdar Stefan Th. Gries , & Milena Žic Fuchs (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: convergence and expansion (pp. 4766). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ivan A Sag . (2010). English filler−gap constructions. Language, 86 (3), 486545.

Ivan A. Sag , & Thomas Wasow (2011). Performance-compatible competence grammar. In Robert D. Borsley , & Kersti Börjars (Eds.), Non-transformational syntax: formal and explicit models of grammar (pp. 359377). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Michael Spranger , Simon Pauw , Martin Loetzsch , & Luc Steels (2012). Open-ended procedural semantics. In Luc Steels , & Manfred Hild (Eds.), Language grounding in robots (pp. 153172). New York: Springer Verlag.

Luc Steels (Ed.) (2011a). Design patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Luc Steels (2011b). A design pattern for phrasal constructions. In Luc Steels (Ed.), Design patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar (pp. 71114). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Luc Steels (Ed.) (2012). Computational issues in Fluid Construction Grammar. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.

Remi van Trijp (2011). A design pattern in for argument structure constructions. In Luc Steels (Ed.), Design patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar (pp. 115145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Shravan Vasishth , & Richard L Lewis . (2006). Argument−head distance and processing complexity: explaining both locality and antilocality effects. Language, 82 (4), 767794.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Language and Cognition
  • ISSN: 1866-9808
  • EISSN: 1866-9859
  • URL: /core/journals/language-and-cognition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score