Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Separating viewpoint from mode of representation in iconic co-speech gestures: insights from Danish narratives

<span class='sc'>abstract</span>

During narrative retelling, speakers shift between different viewpoints to reflect how they conceptualize the events that unfolded. These viewpoints can be indicated through gestural means as well as through verbal ones. Studies of co-speech gestures have inferred viewpoint from gesture form, i.e., how entities are mapped onto the (primarily manual) articulators, but the merits of this approach have not been discussed. The present study argues that viewpoint is more than gestural form. Despite connections between the two, many other factors may influence a gesture’s form. Assessing viewpoint from gesture form alone limits the applicability of gestural viewpoint as a window onto speakers’ event conceptualization and introduces unnecessary differences in the categorization of viewpoint across gestures types. The present study examines iconic co-speech gestures in Danish narratives, and makes explicit the means used to infer gestural viewpoint. The approach advocated here ensures that the notion of viewpoint can be applied in a principled way to all or most iconic gestures.

Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Anne Therese Frederiksen, UCSD Linguistics Department, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0108. e-mail:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D. Aarons , & R Morgan . (2003). Classifier predicates and the creation of multiple perspectives in South African Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 3(2), 125156.

J. Bavelas , & N Chovil . (1997). Faces in dialogue. In J. Russell & J. Fernández-Dols (Eds.), The psychology of facial expression (pp. 334346). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

G. Beattie , & H Shovelton . (2001). An experimental investigation of the role of different types of iconic gesture in communication: a semantic feature approach. Gesture, 1(2), 129149.

G. Beattie , & H Shovelton . (2002). An experimental investigation of some properties of individual iconic gestures that mediate their communicative power. British Journal of Psychology, 93(2), 179192.

A. M. Borghi , A. M. Glenberg , & M. P Kaschak . (2004). Putting words in perspective. Memory & Cognition, 32(6), 863873.

D. Brentari , M. Coppola , L. Mazzoni , & S Goldin-Meadow . (2012). When does a system become phonological? Handshape production in gesturers, signers, and homesigners. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 30(1), 131.

D. Brentari , A. D. Renzo , J. Keane , & V Volterra . (2014). Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic sources of a handshape distinction expressing agentivity. Topics in Cognitive Science, 7(1), 95123.

T. T. Brunyé , T. Ditman , C. R. Mahoney , J. S. Augustyn , & H. A Taylor . (2009). When you and I share perspectives: pronouns modulate perspective taking during narrative comprehension. Psychological Science, 20(1), 2732.

D. Bryant , & B Tversky . (1999). Mental representations of perspective and spatial relations from diagrams and models. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(1), 137156.

J. Cassell , & D McNeill . (1991). Gesture and the poetics of prose. Poetics Today, 12(3), 375404.

H. H Clark . (2016). Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological Review, 123(3), 324347.

S. Debreslioska , A. Özyürek , M. Gullberg , & P Perniss . (2013). Gestural viewpoint signals referent accessibility. Discourse Processes, 50(7), 431456.

S DeLancey . (1981). An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language, 57(3), 626657.

P Dudis . (2004). Body partitioning and real-space blends. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(2), 223238.

H. Earis , & K Cormier (2013). Point of view in British Sign Language and spoken English narrative discourse: the example of ‘The Tortoise and the Hare’. Language and Cognition, 5, 313343.

K. Emmorey , B. Tversky , & H Taylor . (2000). Using space to describe space: perspective in speech, sign, and gesture. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2(3), 157180.

E Engberg-Pedersen . (2015). Perspective in signed discourse: the privileged status of the signer’s locus and gaze. Open Linguistics, 1(1), online <10.1515/opli-2015-0010>.

A. M. Glenberg , & M. P Kaschak . (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558565.

A. Hostetter , & M Alibali . (2008). Visible embodiment: gesture as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15(3), 495514.

A. Hostetter , & M Alibali . (2010). Language, gesture, action! A test of the Gesture as Simulated Action framework. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 245257.

M. P. Kaschak , & A. M Glenberg . (2000). Constructing meaning: the role of affordances and grammatical constructions in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(3), 508529.

A Kendon . (2004). Gesture: visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

S. Kita , & A Özyürek . (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 1632.

S Liddell . (1998). Grounded blends, gestures, and conceptual shifts. Cognitive Linguistics, 9(3), 283314.

S Liddell . (2003). Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

A. Lieberman , M. Hatrak , & R Mayberry . (2014). Learning to look for language: development of joint attention in young deaf children. Language Learning and Development, 10, 1935.

M. E. J. Masson , D. N. Bub , & C. M Warren . (2008). Kicking calculators: contribution of embodied representations to sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(3), 256265.

D McNeill . (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

F Parrill . (2009). Dual viewpoint gestures. Gesture, 9(3), 271289.

F Parrill . (2010). Viewpoint in speech–gesture integration: linguistic structure, discourse structure, and event structure. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(5), 650668.

F Parrill . (2012). Interactions between discourse status and viewpoint in co-speech gesture. In B. Dancygier & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Viewpoint in language: a multimodal perspective (pp. 97112). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

P Perniss . (2007). Achieving spatial coherence in German Sign Language narratives: the use of classifiers and perspective. Lingua, 117(7), 13151338.

W. Sandler , & D. C Lillo-Martin . (2006). Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

J Sidnell . (2006). Coordinating gesture, talk, and gaze in reenactments. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 39(4), 377409.

R. A. Stanfield , & R. A Zwaan . (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12(2), 153156.

K Stec . (2012). Meaningful shifts: a review of viewpoint markers in co-speech gesture and sign language. Gesture, 12(3), 327360.

J Streeck . (1993) Gesture as communication I: its coordination with gaze and speech. Communication Monographs, 60(4), 275299.

J Streeck . (2009). Gesturecraft: the manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

A Stukenbrock . (2014). Pointing to an ‘empty’ space: Deixis am Phantasma in face-to-face interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 74, 7093.

E Sweetser . (2012). Introduction: viewpoint and perspective in language and gesture, from the ground up. In B. Dancygier & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Viewpoint in language: a multimodal perspective (pp. 124). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

S. A. Thompson , & R Suzuki . (2014). Reenactments in conversation: gaze and recipiency. Discourse Studies, 16(6), 816846.

R. A Zwaan . (1999). Situation models: the mental leap into imagined worlds. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(1), 1518.

R. A. Zwaan , R. A. Stanfield , & R. H Yaxley . (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 13(2), 168171.

R. A. Zwaan , & L. J Taylor . (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 135(1), 111.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Language and Cognition
  • ISSN: 1866-9808
  • EISSN: 1866-9859
  • URL: /core/journals/language-and-cognition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 22 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 370 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 10th January 2017 - 17th August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.