Skip to main content
×
Home

The effect of language mode on motion event descriptions in German–French bilinguals*

  • RAPHAEL BERTHELE (a1) and LADINA STOCKER (a1)
abstract
<span class='sc'>abstract</span>

When describing motion in space, speakers of French and German are known to show different preferences. In French, the verb typically encodes the path, whereas in German the manner in which the figure moves is mapped onto the verb. In this paper, this difference between the two languages is investigated, drawing on the data produced by forty participants. All participants are multilinguals, with German and French as their two strongest languages. They described fifty video clips in two sessions, once in monolingual and once in bilingual mode. The critical stimuli were always described in German in both language modes, the fillers in German in monolingual mode but in French in bilingual mode. The analyses of the manner and path verb uses show that, in a bilingual mode, speakers significantly converge towards the French model, that is, they reduce the preference for manner verbs and increase the proportion of path verbs.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Raphael Berthele, Plurilinguisme et langues étrangères, Rue de Rome 1, CH-1700 Fribourg/Freiburg, Switzerland. tel: +41263007140; e-mail: raphael.berthele@unifr.ch
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Many thanks to Letty Naigles for allowing us to use her stimulus materials. Thanks to Beatrice Zanoni, Claudia Horisberger, Elisabeth Paliot, and Lavinia Olariu for their great help with the data collection. Thanks to Elisabeth Dutton and Jan Vanhove and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper.

Footnotes
References
Hide All
Aske J. (1989). Path predicates in English and Spanish: a closer look. In Hall K., Meacham M., & Shapiro R. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 114). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Athanasopoulos P. (2011). Color and bilingual cognition. In Cook V. & Bassetti B. (Eds.), Language and bilingual cognition (pp. 241261). New York: Psychology Press.
Athanasopoulos P., Bylund E., Montero-Melis G., Damjanovic L., Schartner A., Kibbe A., Riches N., & Thierry G. (2015). Two languages, two minds: flexible cognitive processing driven by language of operation. Psychological Science, OnlineFirst, 19.
Auer P. (1999). From codeswitching via language mixing to fused lects: toward a dynamic typology of bilingual speech. International Journal of Bilingualism, 3/4, 309331.
Barr D. J., Levy R., Scheepers C., & Tily H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255278.
Bassetti B. (2007). Bilingualism and thought: grammatical gender concepts of objects in Italian–German bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingualism, 11(3), 251273.
Bedore L. M., Pena E. D., Summers C. L., Boerger K. M., Resendiz M. D., Greene K., Bohman T. M., & Gillam R. B. (2012). The measure matters: language dominance profiles across measures in Spanish–English bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(3), 616629.
Berthele R. (2004). The typology of motion and posture verbs: a variationist account. In Kortmann B. (Ed.), Dialectology meets typology: dialect grammar from a cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 93126). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Berthele R. (2006). Ort und Weg. Eine vergleichende Untersuchung der sprachlichen Raumreferenz in Varietäten des Deutschen, Rätoromanischen und Französischen. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.
Berthele R. (2007a). Contact de langues et conceptualisations spatiales. Aspects de la sémantique et de la grammaire de la référence spatiale en sursilvan, vallader et surmiran. Vox Romanica, 66, 6071.
Berthele R. (2007b). Sein+Direktionalergänzung: Bewegung ohne Bewegungsverb. In Geist L. & Rothstein B. (Eds.), Kopulaverben und Kopulasätze. Intersprachliche und intrasprachliche Aspekte (pp. 229252). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Berthele R. (2013). Disentangling manner and path: evidence from varieties of German and Romance. In Goschler J. & Stefanowitsch A. (Eds.), Variation and change in the coding of motion events (pp. 5575). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Blomberg J. (2014). Motion in language and experience: actual and non-actual motion in Swedish, French and Thai. Lund: University of Lund.
Brown A. (2007). Crosslinguistic influence in first and second languages: convergence in speech and gesture. Boston: Boston University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences.
Cadierno T. (2010). Motion in Danish as a second language: Does the learner’s L1 make a difference? In Han Z. & Cadierno T. (Eds.), Linguistic relativity in second language acquisition: thinking for speaking (pp. 133). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Cadierno T., & Ruiz L. (2006). Motion events in Spanish L2 acquisition. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 183216.
Cenoz J., Hufeisen B., & Jessner U. (2001). Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Cook V., & Bassetti B. (2011). Language and bilingual cognition. New York: Psychology Press.
Cook V., Bassetti B., Kasai C., Sasaki M., & Takahashi J. (2006). Do bilinguals have different concepts? The case of shape and material in Japanese L2 users of English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 10(2), 137152.
Dijkstra T., & van Hell J. G. (2003). Testing the language mode hypothesis using multilinguals. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 6(1), 216.
Dobson A. J., & Barnett A. G. (2008). An introduction to generalized linear models. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Dunn A. L., & Fox Tree J. E. (2009). A quick, gradient Bilingual Dominance Scale. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12(3), 273289.
Dunn A. L., & Fox Tree J. E. (2012). More on language mode. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18(6), 605613.
Filipovic L. (2011). Speaking and remembering in one or two languages: bilingual vs. monolingual lexicalization and memory for motion events. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15(4), 466485.
Fishman J. (2005 [1967]). Bilingualism with and without diglossia; diglossia with and without bilingualism. In Wei L. (Ed.), The bilingualism reader (pp. 8188). New York: Routledge.
Gertken L. M., Amengual M., & Birdsong D. (2014). Assessing language dominance with the Bilingual Language Profile. In Leclercq P., Edmonds A., & Hilton H. (Eds.), Measuring L2 proficiency: perspectives from SLA (pp. 208225). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Goschler J. (2013). Motion events in Turkish–German contact varieties. In Goschler J. & Stefanowitsch A. (Eds.), Variation and change in the coding of motion events (pp. 115132). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goschler J., & Stefanowitsch A. (Eds.) (2013). Variation and change in the encoding of motion events. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Green D. W. (1986). Control, activation and resource: a framework and a model for the control of speech in bilinguals. Brain and Language, 27, 210223.
Green D. W. (1998). Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 6781.
Grosjean F. (1998). Studying bilinguals: methodological and conceptual issues. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(2), 131149.
Grosjean F. (2008). Studying bilinguals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haugen E. (1950). The analysis of linguistic borrowing. Language, 14, 112120.
Hickmann M. (1998). Person, space, and information status in children’s narratives: a crosslinguistic analysis. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica ed Applicata, 27(1), 4765.
Hickmann M. (2003). Space. In Hickmann M. (Ed.), Children’s discourse: person, space and time across languages (pp. 240281). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hohenstein J., Eisenberg A., & Naigles L. (2006). Is he floating across or crossing afloat? Cross-influence of L1 and L2 in Spanish–English bilingual adults. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9(3), 249261.
Jarvis S. (2000). Methodological rigor in the study of transfer: identifying L1 influence in the interlanguage lexicon. Language Learning, 50(2), 245309.
Kellerman E., & Sharwood Smith M. (1986). Crosslinguistic influence in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon Institute of English.
Kersten A. W., Meissner C. A., Lechuga J., Schwartz B. L., Albrechtsen J. S., & Iglesias A. (2010). English speakers attend more strongly than Spanish speakers to manner of motion when classifying novel objects and events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(4), 638653.
Kopecka A. (2013). Describing motion events in Old and Modern French: discourse effects of a typological change. In Goschler J. & Stefanowitsch A. (Eds.), Variation and change in the coding of motion events (pp. 163184). Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
Kopecka A., & Narasimhan B. (2012). Events of ‘putting’ and ‘taking’: a crosslinguistic perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Lai V. T., Rodriguez G. G., & Narasimhan B. (2014). Thinking-for-speaking in early and late bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17(1), 139152.
Larrañaga P., Treffers-Daller J., Tidball F., & Gil Ortega M. (2012). L1-transfer in the acquisition of manner and path in Spanish by native speakers of English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 16(1), 117138.
Mackey W. F. (2004). The description of bilingualism. In Wei L. (Ed.), The bilingualism reader (pp. 2654). London: Routledge.
Malblanc A. (1968). Stylistique comparée du Français et de l’Allemand. Paris: Librairie Marcel Didier.
Marian V., Spivey M., & Hirsch J. (2003). Shared and separate systems in bilingual language processing: converging evidence from eyetracking and brain imaging. Brain and Language, 86(1), 7082.
Matras Y. (2009). Language contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Matsumoto Y., Akita K., & Takahashi K. (n.d.). The interactional nature of deictic verbs in English, Japanese, and Thai: Why deixis must be treated separately from Path. Unpublished ms, Kobe University. Online: <http://www.lit.kobe-u.ac.jp/∼yomatsum/papers/DeixisEngJapTha.pdf>.
Naigles L. R., Eisenberg A. R., Kako E. T., Highter M., & McGraw N. (1998). Speaking of motion: verb use in English and Spanish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13(5), 521549.
Nicoladis E., Alyssa R., & Cassandra F.-S. (2010). Thinking for speaking and cross-linguistic transfer in preschool bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13(3), 345370.
Odlin T. (2003). Cross-linguistic influence. In Doughty C. J. & Long M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 436486). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Pavlenko A. (Ed.) (2011). Thinking and speaking in two languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Pavlenko A., & Jarvis S. (2002). Bidirectional transfer. Applied Linguistics, 23, 190214.
Ricca D. (1991). Andare e venire nelle lingue romanze e germaniche: dall’Aktionsart alla deissi. Archivio Glottologico Italiano, 76(2), 159192.
Ringbom H. (1992). On L1 transfer in L2 comprehension and L2 production. Language Learning, 42, 85112.
Slobin D. I. (1996). From ‘thought and language’ to ‘thinking for speaking’. In Gumperz J. J. & Levinson S. C. (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 7096). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Slobin D. I. (2004). The many ways to search for a frog: linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Strömqvist S. & Verhoeven L. (Eds.), Relating events in narrative: typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 219257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Slobin D. I. (2006a). Coding of motion events in texts: Berkeley coding manual. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley.
Slobin D. I. (2006b). What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In Hickmann M. & Robert S. (Eds.), Space in languages: linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 5981). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Slobin D. I., & Hoiting N. (1994). Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: typological considerations. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 20, 487505.
Soares C., & Grosjean F. (1984). Bilinguals in a monolingual and a bilingual speech mode: the effect on lexical access. Memory & Cognition, 12(4), 380386.
Strömqvist S., & Verhoeven L. (2004). Relating events in narrative: typological and contextual perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Talmy L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In Shopen T. (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Volume III: grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 57149). Cambridge/London: Cambridge University Press.
Talmy L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Volume II: typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.
Tesnière L. (1969). Éléments de syntaxe structurale. Deuxième édition revue et corrigée. Nouveau Tirage. Paris: Klincksieck.
Toribio A. J. (2004). Convergence as an optimization strategy in bilingual speech: evidence from code-switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7(2), 165173.
Treffers-Daller J., & Tidball F. (2015). Can L2 learners learn new ways to conceptualize events? Evidence from motion event construal among English-speaking learners of French. In Guijarro-Fuentes P., Schmitz K., & Müller N. (Eds.), The acquisition of French in its different constellations (pp. 145184). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Vanhove J. (2015). Thinking about graphs. In Vanhove J. (Ed.), Blog posts Jan Vanhove, Fribourg. Online: <https://janhove.github.io/reporting/2015/02/21/thinking-about-graphs>.
Wälchli B. (2001). A typology of displacement (with special reference to Latvian). Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung, 54(3), 298323.
Wälchli B. (2009). Motion events in parallel texts: a study in primary-data typology. Unpublished ms, Bern.
Weinreich U. (1953). Languages in contact: findings and problems. The Hague/Paris: Mouton.
Weinreich U. (2011). Languages in contact: French, German and Romansch in twentieth-century Switzerland. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Language and Cognition
  • ISSN: 1866-9808
  • EISSN: 1866-9859
  • URL: /core/journals/language-and-cognition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 9
Total number of PDF views: 95 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 575 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 21st November 2016 - 22nd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.