Skip to main content
×
Home

Idiom as the intersection of conceptual and syntactic schemas

  • DANIEL SANFORD (a1)
Abstract
<span class='sc'>abstract</span>

Two key issues in the study of idiom are the metaphorical status of idioms (whether or not underlying metaphors are active in the on-line processing of figurative idiomatic expressions) and the compositional status of idioms (whether or not the overall meaning of such expressions is analyzable from internal elements). This study addresses these questions from the perspective of emergent metaphor theory (Sanford, 2012, 2013), arguing that key properties of such expressions − idiosyncrasy of both form and meaning, the potential for idiom to be manipulated in discourse, and diachronic patterns in changes of idiomatic meaning − follow from the status of metaphorical idioms as highly entrenched instances of both conceptual and syntactic mappings. In the case of both types of schema, the interaction of type and token frequency effects predict the metaphoricity and analyzability of idioms.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Aitchision J. (1987). Words in the mind: an introduction to the mental lexicon. London: Blackwell.
Allbritton D. W., McKoon G., & Gerrig R. J. (1995). Metaphor-based schemata and text representations: making connections through conceptual metaphors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 612625.
Barlow M., & Kemmer S. (1994). A schema-based approach to grammatical description. In Luna S. D., Corrigan R. L., & Iverson G. K. (Eds.), The reality of linguistic rules (pp. 1942). New York / Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Billig M., & MacMillan K. (2005). Metaphor, idiom and ideology: the search for ‘no smoking guns’ across time. Discourse & Society, 16(4), 459480.
Bock J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355387.
Bolinger D. (1981). Two kinds of vowels, two kinds of rhythm. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Bowdle B. F., and Gentner D. (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112(1), 193216.
Branigan H., Pickering M., & Cleland A. (2000). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75, B1325.
Bybee J. (1985). Morphology: a study of the relation between meaning and form. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bybee J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 425455.
Bybee J. (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee J. (2006). From usage to grammar: the mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711733.
Bybee J., & Thompson S. (1997). Three frequency effects in syntax. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 23, 378388.
Cacciari C., & Tabossi P. (1988). The comprehension of idioms. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 668683.
Cameron L., & Deignan A. (2006). The emergence of metaphor in discourse. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 671690.
Chomsky N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky N. (1980). Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.
Cooper D. (1986). Metaphor. London: Blackwell.
Croft W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar: syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cronk B., Lima S., & Schweigert W. (1993). Idioms in sentences: effects of frequency, literalness, and familiarity. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 5982.
Cruse D. (1986). Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dabrowska E. (2006). From formula to schema: the acquisition of English questions. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(1/2), 83102.
Davies M. (2008−) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 385 million words, 1990−present, online <http://www.americancorpus.org>.
Deignan A. (2005). Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Espinal T., & Mateu J. (2010). On classes of idioms and their interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 13971411.
Fillmore C., Kay P., & O’Connor M. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: the case of let ‘alone’. Language, 64, 501538.
Fowler C., & Housum J. (1987). Talkers’ signalling of ‘new” and “old’ words in speech and listeners’ perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 489504.
Gibbs R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs R. W., Bogdanovich J. M., Sykes J. R., & Barr D. J. (1997). Metaphor in idiom comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 141154.
Gibbs R. W., & O’Brien J. E. (1990). Idioms and mental imagery: the metaphoric motivation for idiomatic meaning. Cognition, 36, 3568.
Giora R. (2002). Literal vs. figurative language: different or equal? Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 487506.
Glasbey S. (2003). Let’s paint the town red for a few hours: composition of aspect in idioms. Proceedings of the ACL 2003 Workshop on Lexicon and Figurative Language, 14, 4349.
Glucksberg S., Brown M., & McGlone M. S. (1993). Conceptual metaphors are not automatically accessed during idiom comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 21(5), 711719.
Goldberg A. (1995). Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg A. (2006). Constructions at work: the nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gregory M., Raymond W., Bell A., Fosler-Lussier E., & Jurafsky D. (1999). The effects of collocational strength and contextual predictability in lexical production. Papers from the Regional Meetings, Chicago Linguistic Society 35, 151166.
Gries S. T. (2005). Syntactic priming: a corpus-based approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, 365399.
Hamblin J., & Gibbs R. (1999). Why you can’t kick the bucket as you slowly die: verbs in idiom comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(1), 2539.
Jackendoff R. (1992). Babe Ruth homered his way into the hearts of America. In Stowell Tim and Wehrli Eric (Eds.), Syntax and the lexicon (pp. 155178). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Keysar B., Shen Y., Glucksberg S., & Horton W. (2000). Conventional language: how metaphorical is it? Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 576593.
Lakoff G. (1987). The death of dead metaphor. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 2(2), 143147.
Lakoff G. (1992). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Ortony Andrew (Ed.), Metaphor and thought, 2nd ed. (pp. 202251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff G., Espenson J., & Schwartz A. (1991). The master metaphor list. Draft 2nd ed. Technical Report, University of California at Berkeley, online: <http://araw.mede.uic.edu/∼alansz/metaphor/METAPHORLIST.pdf>.
McGlone M., Glucksberg S., & Cacciari C. (1994). Semantic productivity and idiom comprehension. Discourse Processes, 17, 167190.
Nunberg G., Sag I., & Wasow T. (1994). Idioms. Language, 70(3), 491538.
Poplack S. (1980). The notion of the plural in Puerto Rican Spanish: competing constraints on (s) deletion. In Labov W. (Ed.), Locating language in time and space (pp. 5567). New York: Academic Press.
Sanford D. R. (2008a). Metaphor and phonological reduction in English idiomatic expressions. Cognitive Linguistics, 19(4), 585603.
Sanford D. R. (2008b). Discourse & metaphor: a corpus-driven inquiry. Corpus Linguistics & Linguistic Theory, 4(2), 209234.
Sanford D. R. (2012). Metaphors are conceptual schemata that are emergent over tokens of use. Journal of Cognitive Science, 13(3), 211235.
Sanford D. R. (2013). Emergent Metaphor Theory: frequency, schematic strength, and the processing of metaphorical utterances. Journal of Cognitive Science, 14(1), 145.
Scherre M., & Naro A. (1991). Marking in discourse: ‘birds of a feather’. Language Variation and Change, 3, 2332.
Strassler J. (1982). Idioms in English. Tübingen: Gunter nar Verlag.
Taylor J. (1998). Syntactic constructions as prototype categories. In Tomasello M. (Ed.) The new psychology of language (pp. 177202). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wray A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Language and Cognition
  • ISSN: 1866-9808
  • EISSN: 1866-9859
  • URL: /core/journals/language-and-cognition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 51 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 280 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.