Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Investigating intertextuality and interdiscursivity in evaluation: the case of conceptual blending

<span class='sc'>abstract</span>

The present paper investigates the sense making practices of participants in interaction within the context of reception studies of advertising and explores the cognitive nature of intertextuality and interdiscursivity as evidence of conceptual integration. The paper argues that sense making, through its intertextual and interdiscursive nature, is a carrier of attitudinal disposition which is manifested in the lexical selection of evaluative items arising from conceptual integration. The data examined for this study were collected from informants in focus groups when discussing a series of printed adverts that make reference to works of art. The results of the analysis indicate that intertextuality and interdiscursivity can be seen as constituting evidence of the conceptual phenomena of blending theory in sense making from where evaluative disposition emerges. They further suggest that both are processes in the audience’s sense making process rather than merely a feature of texts.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

I Ajzen . (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 2758.

S Bullo . (2014). Evaluation in advertising reception: a socio-cognitive study. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

V. Evans , & M Green . (2006). Cognitive linguistics: an introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

N Fairclough . (1992). Discourse and social change. London: Polity Press.

C Hart . (2010). Critical discourse analysis and cognitive science: new perspectives on immigration discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

J. R. Martin , & P. R. R White . (2005). The language of evaluation: appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

R. Petty , D. Wegener , & L Fabrigar . (1997). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 609647.

Y Rogers . (2006). Distributed cognition and communication. In K. Brown (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. (2nd edition.). Elsevier. Pp. 731733.

E Semino . (2012). Unrealistic scenarios, metaphorical blends and rhetorical strategies across genres. In B. Dancygier , J. Sanders , & L. Vandelanotte (Eds.), Textual choices in discourse: a view from cognitive linguistics (pp. 111136). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Language and Cognition
  • ISSN: 1866-9808
  • EISSN: 1866-9859
  • URL: /core/journals/language-and-cognition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 15 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 99 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 27th April 2017 - 21st August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.