Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Languages adapt to their contextual niche

  • JAMES WINTERS (a1), SIMON KIRBY (a1) and KENNY SMITH (a1)
Abstract

It is well established that context plays a fundamental role in how we learn and use language. Here we explore how context links short-term language use with the long-term emergence of different types of language system. Using an iterated learning model of cultural transmission, the current study experimentally investigates the role of the communicative situation in which an utterance is produced (situational context) and how it influences the emergence of three types of linguistic systems: underspecified languages (where only some dimensions of meaning are encoded linguistically), holistic systems (lacking systematic structure), and systematic languages (consisting of compound signals encoding both category-level and individuating dimensions of meaning). To do this, we set up a discrimination task in a communication game and manipulated whether the feature dimension shape was relevant or not in discriminating between two referents. The experimental languages gradually evolved to encode information relevant to the task of achieving communicative success, given the situational context in which they are learned and used, resulting in the emergence of different linguistic systems. These results suggest language systems adapt to their contextual niche over iterated learning.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: e-mail: J.R.Winters@sms.ed.ac.uk
References
Hide All
Altmann, E. G., Pierrehumbert, J. B., & Motter, A. E. (2011). Niche as a determinant of word fate in online groups. PLoS ONE, 6(5), e19009. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019009.
Ay, N., Flack, J. C., & Krakauer, D. C. (2007). Robustness and complexity co-constructed in multimodal signaling networks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 362, 441447.
Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bach, K. (2012). Context dependence (such as it is). In Garcia-Carpintero, M. & Kolbel, M. (Eds.), The Continuum companion to the philosophy of language, online <http://userwww.sfsu.edu/kbach/Bach.ContextDependence.pdf>.
Bates, D. M., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2012). lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-0, online <http://www.citeulike.org/group/17044/article/12173300>.
Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W.Schoenemann, T. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: position paper. Language Learning, 59, 126.
Beuls, K., & Steels, L. (2013). Agent-based models of strategies for the emergence and evolution of grammatical agreement. PLoS ONE 8(3), e58960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058960.
Bleys, J., & Steels, L. (2009). Linguistic selection of language strategies – a case study for colour. ECAL, 2, 150157.
Bratman, M. (1992). Shared cooperative activity. Philosophical Review, 101, 327341.
Brighton, H., Kirby, S., & Smith, K. (2005). Cultural selection for learnability: three principles underlying the view that language adapts to be learnable. In Tallerman, M. (Ed.), Language origins: perspectives on evolution (Chapter 13). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Caldwell, C. A., & Smith, K. (2012). Cultural evolution and perpetuation of arbitrary communicative conventions in experimental microsocieties. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e43807. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043807.
Chafe, W. (1976). Giveness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Li, Charles N. (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 2556). New York: Academic Press.
Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. H. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Science, 31(5), 489508.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cornish, H., Tamariz, M., & Kirby, S. (2009). Complex adaptive systems and the origins of adaptive structure: what experiments can tell us. Language Learning (Special Issue on Language as a Complex Adaptive System), 59(s1), 187205.
Croft, W. (2000). Explaining language change: an evolutionary approach. Harlow: Longman.
Culbertson, J., & Adger, D. (2014). Language learners privilege structured meaning over surface frequency. PNAS, 111(16), 58425847.
Culbertson, J., Smolensky, P., & Wilson, C. (2013). Cognitive biases, linguistic universals, and constraint-based grammar learning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5(3), 392424.
Dingemanse, M., Torreira, F., & Enfield, N. J. (2013). Is ‘Huh?’ a universal word? Conversational infrastructure and the convergent evolution of linguistic items. PLoS ONE, 8(11), e78273. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078273.
Du Bois, J. W. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity. Language, 63(4), 805855.
Dunn, M., Greenhill, S. J., Levinson, S. C., & Gray, R. D. (2011). Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals. Nature, 473, 7982.
Evans, N., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(5), 429492.
Evans, V. (2005). The meaning of time: polysemy, the lexicon and conceptual structure. Journal of Linguistics, 41, 3375.
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: an introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Fay, N., & Ellison, T. M. (2013). The cultural evolution of human communication systems in different sized populations: usability trumps learnability. PLoS ONE, 8(8), e71781. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071781.
Fedzechkina, M., Jaeger, T. F., & Newport, E. L. (2012). Language learners restructure their input to facilitate efficient communication. PNAS, 109, 1789717902.
Ferreira, V., Slevc, L., & Rogers, E. (2005). How do speakers avoid ambiguous linguistic expressions? Cognition, 96(3), 263284.
Fery, C., & Krifka, M. (2008). Information structure: notional distinctions, ways of expression. In Sterkenburg, Piet van (Ed.), Unity and diversity of languages (pp. 123136). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Frank, M. C., & Goodman, N. D. (2012). Predicting pragmatic reasoning in language games. Science, 336, 998. doi: 10.1126/science.1218633.
Galantucci, B., Garrod, S., & Roberts, G. (2012). Experimental Ssemiotics. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6, 477493.
Galantucci, B., Kroos, C., & Rhodes, T. (2010). The effects of rapidity of fading on communication systems. Interaction Studies, 11, 100111.
Garrod, S., Fay, N., Lee, J., Oberlander, J., & MacLeod, T. (2007). Foundations of representation: Where might graphical symbol systems come from? Cognitive Science, 31, 961987.
Geeraerts, D. (1993). Vagueness’s puzzles, polysemy’s vagaries. Cognitive Linguistics, 4(3), 223272.
Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review, 66, 377388.
Griffiths, T. L., & Kalish, M. (2007). Language evolution by iterated learning with Bayesian agents. Cognitive Science, 31, 441480.
Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemeyer, F. (1991). Grammaticalization: a conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hoefler, S. H. (2009). Modelling the role of pragmatic plasticity in the evolution of linguistic communication. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh.
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (2003). Grammaticalization (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kirby, S. (1999). Function, selection and innateness: the emergence of language universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kirby, S. (2012). Language is an adaptive system. the role of cultural evolution in the origins of structure. In Tallerman, M. & Gibson, K. R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language evolution (pp. 589604). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kirby, S., Cornish, S., & Smith, K. (2008). Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: an experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. PNAS, 105, 1068110686.
Kirby, S., & Hurford, J. (2002). The emergence of linguistic structure: an overview of the iterated learning model. In Cangelosi, A. & Parisi, D. (Eds.), Simulating the evolution of language (pp. 121148). London: Springer Verlag.
Lass, R. (1997). Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, S. (2000). Presumptive meanings: the theory of generalised conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lewis, M., Sugarman, E., & Frank, M. C. (2014). The structure of the lexicon reflects principles of communication. In Bello, P., Guarini, M., McShane, M., & Scassellati, B. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, online <http://langcog.stanford.edu/papers/LF-cogsci2014.pdf>.
Lupyan, G., & Dale, R. (2010). Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PLoS ONE, 5(1), e8559. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008559.
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, G. A. (1951). Language and communication. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Perfors, A., & Navarro, D. J. (2014). Language evolution can be shaped by the structure of the world. Cognitive Science, 38(4), 775793.
Piantadosi, S. T., Tily, H., & Gibson, E. (2012). The communicative function of ambiguity in language. Cognition, 122, 280291.
Pinker, S., & Bloom, P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 707784.
R Core Team. (2013). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Ramscar, M., Yarlett, D., Dye, M., Denny, K., & Thorpe, K. (2010). The effects of Feature-Label-Order and their implications for symbolic learning. Cognitive Science, 34, 909957.
Reali, F., & Griffiths, T. L. (2009). The evolution of linguistic frequency distributions: relating regularisation to inductive biases through iterated learning. Cognition, 111, 317328.
Scott-Phillips, T. C., & Kirby, S. (2010). Language evolution in the laboratory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(9), 411417.
Scott-Phillips, T. C., Kirby, S., & Ritchie, G. R. S. (2009). Signalling signalhood and the emergence of communication. Cognition, 113(2), 226233.
Sedivy, J. C. (2005). Evaluating explanations for referential context effects: evidence for Gricean mechanisms in online language interpretation. In Trueswell, J. C. & Tanenhaus, M. K. (Eds.), Approaches to studying world-situated language use: bridging the language as product and language as action traditions (pp. 153171). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Selten, R., & Warglien, M. (2007). The emergence of simple languages in an experimental coordination game. PNAS, 104, 73617366.
Silvey, C., Kirby, S., & Smith, K. (2014). Word meanings evolve to selectively preserve relevant distinctions over cultural transmission. Cognitive Science. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12150.
Smith, K., Tamariz, M., & Kirby, S. (2013). Linguistic structure is an evolutionary trade-off between simplicity and expressivity. In Knauff, M., Pauen, M., Sebanz, N., & Wachsmuth, I. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 13481353). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Smith, K., & Wonnacott, E. (2010). Eliminating unpredictable variation through iterated learning. Cognition, 116, 444449.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford/Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.
Steels, L. (2003). Evolving grounded communication for robots. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(7), 308312.
Steels, L. (2012). Self-organization and selection in cultural language evolution. In Steels, Luc (Ed.), Experiments in cultural language evolution (pp. 137). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Thiesen-White, C., Kirby, S., & Oberlander, J. (2011). Integrating the horizontal and vertical cultural transmission of novel communication systems. In Carlson, L., Hölscher, C., & Shipley, T. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 956961). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Traugott, E., & Konig, E. (1991). The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Traugott, Elizabeth & Heine, Bernd (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization (pp. 189218). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Traugott, E., & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tuggy, D. (1993). Ambiguity, polysemy and vagueness. Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 273291.
Verhoef, T. (2012). The origins of duality of patterning in artificial whistled languages. Language and Cognition, 4(4), 357380.
Wedgwood, D. (2007). Shared assumptions: semantic minimalism and relevance theory. Journal of Linguistics, 43, 647681.
Wray, A., & Grace, G. W. (2007). The consequences of talking to strangers: evolutionary corollaries of socio-cultural influences on linguistic form. Lingua, 117, 543578.
Zipf, G. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Language and Cognition
  • ISSN: 1866-9808
  • EISSN: 1866-9859
  • URL: /core/journals/language-and-cognition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed