Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T05:43:12.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the path of time: temporal motion in typological perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2020

MICHELE I. FEIST  and
SARAH E. DUFFY
MICHELE I. FEIST*
Affiliation:
University of Louisiana at Lafayette
SARAH E. DUFFY
Affiliation:
Northumbria University
*
Corresponding author: Michele I. Feist, feist@louisiana.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Moving Ego and Moving Time metaphors have provided a fertile testing ground for the psychological reality of space–time metaphors. Despite this, little research has targeted the linguistic patterns used in these two mappings. To fill that gap, the current study uses corpus data to examine the use of motion verbs in two typologically different languages, English and Spanish. We first investigated the relative frequency of the two metaphors. Whereas we observed no difference in frequency in the Spanish data, our findings indicated that in English, Moving Time expressions are more prevalent than are Moving Ego expressions. Second, we focused on the patterns of use of the verbs themselves, asking whether well-known typological patterns in the expression of spatial motion would carry over to temporal motion. Specifically, we examined the frequencies of temporal uses of path and manner verbs in English and in Spanish. Contra the patterns observed in space, we observed a preference for path verbs in both languages, with this preference more strongly evident in English than in Spanish. In addition, our findings revealed greater use of motion verbs in temporal expressions in Spanish compared to English. These findings begin to outline constraints on the aspects of spatial conceptualization that are likely to be reused in the conceptualization of time.

Keywords

TimeSpaceMotionMetaphorMoving TimeMoving EgoPathManner
Type
Article
Information
Language and Cognition , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 2020 , pp. 444 - 467
Check for updates
Copyright
© UK Cognitive Linguistics Association, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

An earlier version of this research was presented at the 12th International Conference on Researching and Applying Metaphor. We thank the audience for their thoughtful questions, and we thank Jan Edson Rodrigues Leite for his comments on the ideas presented here as well as the anonymous reviewers for their feedback on earlier versions of this paper.

References

REFERENCES

Aske, J. (1989). Path predicates in English and Spanish: a closer look. In Hall, K., Meacham, M. & Shapiro, R. (eds), Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 1–14). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 75(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boroditsky, L. & Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science 13(2), 185–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brang, D., Teuscher, U., Ramachandran, V. & Coulson, S. (2010). Temporal sequences, synesthetic mappings, and cultural biases: the geography of time. Consciousness and Cognition 19, 311–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caballero, R. & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2015). From physical to metaphorical motion: a cross-genre approach. In Pirrelli, V., Marzi, C. & Ferro, M. (eds), NetWordS 2015: word knowledge and word usage: representations and processes in the mental lexicon. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore.Google Scholar
Cardini, F. (2008). Manner of motion saliency: an inquiry into Italian. Cognitive Linguistics 19(14), 533–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, D. & Jasmin, K. (2012). The hands of time: temporal gestures in English speakers. Cognitive Linguistics 23(4), 643–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cifuentes-Férez, P. (2008). Motion in English and Spanish: a perspective from cognitive linguistics, typology and psycholinguistics. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Murcia. Online <https://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/handle/10803/10816/CifuentesFerez.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Cifuentes-Férez, P. (2009). A crosslinguistic study on the semantics of motion verbs in English and Spanish. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In Moore, T. (ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. (2002–). Corpus del Español: 100 million words, 1200s–1900s. Available online at <http://www.english-corpora.org/bnc/>..>Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2004–). BYU–BNC. (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). Available online at <http://www.english-orpora.org/bnc/>..>Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2010–). The Corpus of Historical American English (COHA): 400 million words, 1810-2009. Available online at <http://www.english-corpora.org/coha/>..>Google Scholar
de la Fuente, J., Santiago, J., Román, A., Dumitrache, C. & Casasanto, D. (2014). When you think about it, your past is in front of you: how culture shapes spatial conceptions of time. Psychological Science 25(9),1682–1690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Divjak, D. & Gries, S. Th. (2006). Ways of trying in Russian: clustering behavioral profiles. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2(1), 23–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Divjak, D. & Gries, S. Th. (2008). Clusters in the mind? Converging evidence from near synonymy in Russian. The Mental Lexicon 3(2), 188–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, S. E. & Feist, M. I. (2014). Individual differences in the interpretation of ambiguous statements about time. Cognitive Linguistics 25(1), 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, S. E. & Feist, M. I. (2017). Power in time: the influence of power posing on metaphoric perspectives on time. Language and Cognition 9(4), 637–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, V. (2004). The structure of time: language, meaning, and temporal cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, V. (2013). Language and time: a cognitive linguistics approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feist, M. I. (2010). Motion through syntactic frames. Cognition 115(1), 192–196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feist, M. I. (2016). Minding your manners: linguistic relativity in motion. Linguagem em (Dis)curso 16(3), 591–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feist, M. I. & Duffy, S. E. (2015). Moving beyond ‘Next Wednesday’: the interplay of lexical semantics and constructional meaning in an ambiguous metaphoric statement. Cognitive Linguistics 26(4), 633–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galton, A. (2011). Time flies but space doesn’t: limits to the spatialization of time. Journal of Pragmatics 43, 695–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gennari, S. P., Sloman, S. A., Malt, B. C. & Fitch, W. T. (2002). Motion events in language and cognition. Cognition 83, 49–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gentleman, R. & Lang, D. T. (2007). Statistical analyses and reproducible research. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 16, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D., Imai, M. & Boroditsky, L. (2002). As time goes by: evidence for two systems in processing space time metaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes 17(5), 537–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentner, D. & Jeziorski, M. (1993). The shift from metaphor to analogy in western science. In Ortony, A. (ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gijssels, T. & Casasanto, D. (2017). Conceptualizing time in terms of space: experimental evidence. In Dancygier, B. (ed.), Cambridge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 651–668). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goschler, J. & Stefanowitsch, A. (eds) (2013). Variation and change in the encoding of motion events (Human Cognitive Processing [HCP] 41). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (1997). From space to time: temporal adverbials in the world’s languages. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. & Caballero, R. (2014). Una aproximación al studio de los eventos de movimiento metafórico desde la tipología semántica y el género. Anuari de Filologia. Estudis de Lingüística 4, 139–155.Google Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M., Divjak, D. & Rakhilina, E. (2010). Aquamotion verbs in Slavic and Germanic: a case study in lexical typology. In Hasko, V. & Perelmutter, R. (eds), New approaches to Slavic verbs of motion (pp. 315–341). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kranjec, A. (2006). Extending spatial frames of reference to temporal concepts. In Forbus, K., Gentner, D. & Regier, T. (eds), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 447–452). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kranjec, A. & McDonough, L. (2011). The implicit and explicit embodiment of time. Journal of Pragmatics 43(3), 735–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lonergan, J. & Gibbs, R. W. (2016). Tackling mixed metaphors in discourse: new corpus and psychological evidence. In Gibbs, R. W. (ed.), Mixing metaphor (pp. 57–72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Margolies, S. & Crawford, L. E. (2008). Event valence and spatial metaphors of time. Cognition and Emotion 22(7), 1401–1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matlock, T., Holmes, K. J., Srinivasan, M. & Ramscar, M. (2011). Even abstract motion influences the understanding of time. Metaphor and Symbol 26, 260–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlone, M. S. & Harding, J. L. (1998). Back (or forward?) to the future: the role of perspective in temporal language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24, 1211–1223.Google Scholar
McGlone, M. S. & Pfiester, R. A. (2009). Does time fly when you’re having fun, or do you? Affect, agency, and embodiment in temporal communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 28, 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McTaggart, J. E. (1908). The unreality of time. Mind 17, 457–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesirov, J. P. (2010). Computer science: accessible reproducible research. Science 327(5964), 415–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, K. E. (2006). Space to time mappings and temporal concepts. Cognitive Linguistics 17(2), 199–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, K. E. (2014). The spatial language of time. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naigles, L. R., Eisenberg, A. R., Kako, E. T., Highter, M. & McGraw, N. (1998). Speaking of motion: verb use in English and Spanish. Language and Cognitive Processes 13(5), 521–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Núñez, R. E., Motz, B. & Teuscher, U. (2006). Time after time: the psychological reality of the Ego- and Time-Reference-Point distinction in metaphorical construals of time. Metaphor and Symbol 21, 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özçalışkan, S. (2004). Typological variation in encoding the manner, path, and ground components of a metaphorical motion event. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 2, 73–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özçalışkan, S. (2005). Metaphor meets typology: ways of moving metaphorically in English and Turkish. Cognitive Linguistics 16(1), 207–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, A., Massey, C. & Gleitman, L. (2002). Shake, rattle, ‘n’ roll: the representation of motion in language and cognition. Cognition 84, 189–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papafragou, A., Massey, C. & Gleitman, L. (2006). When English proposes what Greek presupposes: the cross-linguistic encoding of motion events. Cognition 98, B75–B87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peng, R. D. (2011). Reproducible research in computational science. Science 334(6060), 1226–1227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reali, F. & Lleras, M. (2017). Perspectives in motion: the case of metaphorical temporal statements in Spanish. Language and Cognition 9(1), 172–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santiago, J., Lupiáñez, J., Pérez, E. & Funes, M. J. (2007). Time (also) flies from left to right. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14, 512–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shinohara, K. (1999). Conceptual mappings from spatial motion to time: analysis of English and Japanese. In Nehaniv, C. (ed.), Computation for metaphors, analogy and agents: lecture notes in artificial intelligence (pp. 230–241).Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinohara, K. (2000). Constraints on motion verbs in the TIME IS MOTION metaphor. In Good, J. & Yu, A. (eds), Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 250–259). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Sinha, C., da Silva Sinha, V., Zinken, J. & Sampaio, W. (2011). When time is not space: the social and linguistic construction of time intervals in an Amazonian culture. Language and Cognition 3(1), 137–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slobin, D. I. (1996). From ‘thought and language’ to ‘thinking for speaking’. In Gumperz, J. & Levinson, S. (eds), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (2003). Language and thought online: cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In Gentner, D. & Goldin-Medow, S. (eds), Language in mind (pp. 157–191).Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (2004). The many ways to search for a frog. In Strömqvist, S. & Verhoeven, L. (eds), Relating events in narrative: typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 219–257). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. & Hoiting, N. (1994). Reference to movement in spoken and signed language: typological considerations. In Moore, K., Peterson, D. & Wentum, C. (eds), Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 487–505). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Stickles, E. & Lewis, T. N. (2018). Wednesday’s meeting really is on Friday: a metaanalysis and evaluation of ambiguous spatiotemporal language. Cognitive Science 42(3), 1015–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strömqvist, S. & Verhoeven, L. (eds) (2004). Relating events in narrative: typological and contextual perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, J. L. & Barth, H. C. (2012). Active (not passive) spatial imagery primes temporal judgements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 65, 1101–1109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In Shopen, T. (ed.), Language typology and semantic description, Vol. iii: grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 36–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol. I: concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tenbrink, T. (2007). Space, time, and the use of language: an investigation of relationships. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (1978). On the expression of spatio-temporal relations in language. In Greenberg, J. H., Ferguson, C. A. & Moravcsik, E. A. (eds), Universals of human language, Vol. iii: word structure (pp. 369–400). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. L. (1941). The relation of habitual thought and behavior to language. In Carroll, J. (wd.), Language, thought, and reality: selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (pp. 173–204). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zlatev, J. & Yangklang, P. (2004). A third way to travel: the place of Thai in motion-event typology. In Strömqvist, S. & Verhoeven, L. (eds), Relating events in narrative: typological and contextual perspectives (pp. 159–190). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar