Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Property generation reflects word association and situated simulation

  • Ava Santos (a1), Sergio E. Chaigneau (a2), W. Kyle Simmons (a3) and Lawrence W. Barsalou (a4)
Abstract

The property generation task (i.e. “feature listing”) is often assumed to measure concepts. Typically, researchers assume implicitly that the underlying representation of a concept consists of amodal propositions, and that verbal responses during property generation reveal their conceptual content. The experiments reported here suggest instead that verbal responses during property generation reflect two alternative sources of information: the linguistic form system and the situated simulation system. In two experiments, properties bearing a linguistic relation to the word for a concept were produced earlier than properties not bearing a linguistic relation, suggesting the early properties tend to originate in a word association process. Conversely, properties produced later tended to describe objects and situations, suggesting that late properties tend to originate from describing situated simulations. A companion neuroimaging experiment reported elsewhere confirms that early properties originate in language areas, whereas later properties originate in situated simulation areas. Together, these results, along with other results in the literature, indicate that property generation is a relatively complex process, drawing on at least two systems somewhat asynchronously.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence addresses: Ava Santos, Department of Psychology, 1000 Rim Dr., Fort Lewis College, Durango, CO 81301, USA
Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. E-mail: Santos_a@fortlewis.edu or barsalou@emory.edu
References
Hide All
Andrews, M., Vigliocco, G. & Vinson, D.. 2009. Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations. Psychological Review 116. 463498.
Barsalou, L. W. 1999. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22. 577660.
Barsalou, L. W. 2003a. Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences 358. 11771187.
Barsalou, L. W. 2003b. Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and Cognitive Processes 18. 513562.
Barsalou, L. W. 2005a. Abstraction as dynamic interpretation in perceptual symbol systems. In Gershkoff-Stowe, L. & Rakison, D. (eds.), Building object categories (Carnegie Symposium Series), 389431. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Barsalou, L. W. 2005b. Continuity of the conceptual system across species. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9. 309311.
Barsalou, L. W. 2008a. Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 59. 617645.
Barsalou, L. W. 2008b. Grounding symbolic operations in the brain's modal systems. In Semin, G. R. & Smith, E. R. (eds.), Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches, 942. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Barsalou, L. W. 2008c. Situating concepts. In Robbins, P. & Aydede, M. (eds.), Cambridge handbook of situated cognition, 236263. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Barsalou, L. W., Breazeal, C. & Smith, L. B.. 2007. Cognition as coordinated non-cognition. Cognitive Processing 8. 7991.
Barsalou, L. W., Niedenthal, P. M., Barbey, A. & Ruppert, J.. 2003. Social embodiment. In Ross, B. (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Volume 43, 4392. San Diego: Academic Press.
Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Simmons, W. K. & Wilson, C. D.. 2008. Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In Vega, M. De, Glenberg, A. M. & Graesser, A. C. (eds.), Symbols, embodiment, and meaning, 245283. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barsalou, L. W. & Wiemer-Hastings, K.. 2005. Situating abstract concepts. In Pecher, D. & Zwaan, R. (eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thought, 129163. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Burgess, C. & Lund, K.. 1997. Modelling parsing constraints with high-dimensional context space. Language and Cognitive Processes 12. 177210.
Chaffin, R. 1997. Associations to unfamiliar words: Learning the meanings of new words. Memory and Cognition 25. 203226.
Collins, A. M. & Loftus, E. F.. 1975. A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review 82. 407428.
Craik, F. I. M. 2002. Levels of processing: Past, present … and future? Memory 10. 305318.
Craik, F. I. M. & Lockhart, R. S.. 1972. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11. 671684.
Craik, F. I. M. & Tulving, E.. 1975. Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104. 268294.
Cree, G. S. & McRae, K.. 2003. Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132. 163201.
Damasio, A. R. 1989. Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: A systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition 33. 2562.
Fodor, J. A. 1975. The language of thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gigerenzer, G. 2000. Adaptive thinking: Rationality in the real world. New York: Oxford University Press.
Glaser, W. R. 1992. Picture naming. Cognition 42. 61105.
Glenberg, A. M. 1997. What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20. 155.
Hampton, J. A. 1979. Polymorphous concepts in semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18. 441461.
James, C. 1975. The role of semantic information in lexical decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 104. 130136.
Joordens, S. & Becker, S.. 1997. The long and short of semantic priming effects in lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23. 10831105.
Kan, I. P., Barsalou, L. W., Solomon, K. O., Minor, J. K. & Thompson-Schill, S. L.. 2003. Role of mental imagery in a property verification task: fMRI evidence for perceptual representations of conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology 20. 525540.
Kosslyn, S. M. 1976. Can imagery be distinguished from other forms of internal representation? Evidence from studies of information retrieval times. Memory and Cognition 4. 291297.
Landauer, T. K. & Dumais, S. T.. 1997. A solution to Plato's Problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review 104. 211240.
Lockhart, R. S. 2002. Levels of processing, transfer-appropriate processing, and the concept of robust encoding. Memory 10. 397403.
Louwerse, M. M. 2008. Embodied representations are encoded in language. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 15. 838844.
Martin, A. 2001. Functional neuroimaging of semantic memory. In Cabeza, R. & Kingstone, A. (eds.), Handbook of functional neuroimaging of cognition, 153186. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Martin, A. 2007. The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology 58. 2545.
McRae, K., Cree, G. S., Seidenberg, M. & McNorgan, C.. 2005. Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 37. 547559.
Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D. & Franks, J. J.. 1977. Levels of processing versus test-appropriate strategies. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16. 519533.
Murphy, G. L. 2002. The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L. & Schreiber, T. A.. 1999. The University of South Florida word association, rhyme and word fragment norms. http://web.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/
Paivio, A. 1971. Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Paivio, A. 1986. Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. 1984. Computation and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rosch, E. & Mervis, C. B.. 1975. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7. 573605.
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M. & Boyes-Braem, P.. 1976. Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology 8. 382439.
Shulman, H. G. & Davidson, T. C. B.. 1977. Control properties of semantic coding in the lexical decision task. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16. 9198.
Simmons, W. K., Hamann, S. B., Harenski, C. N., Hu, X. P. & Barsalou, L. W.. 2008. fMRI evidence for word association and situated simulation in conceptual processing. Journal of Physiology—Paris 102. 106119.
Solomon, K. O. & Barsalou, L. W.. 2004. Perceptual simulation in property verification. Memory and Cognition 32. 244259.
Stone, G. O. & Orden, G. C. Van. 1993. Strategic control of processing in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19. 744774.
Smith, E. E. 1978. Theories of semantic memory. In Estes, W. K. (ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes, Volume 6, 156. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Smith, E. E. & Medin, D. L.. 1981. Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Thompson-Schill, S. L. 2003. Neuroimaging studies of semantic memory: inferring “how” from “where”. Neurosychologia 41. 280292.
Tulving, E. & Thomson, D. M.. 1973. Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review 80. 352373.
Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D., Barrett, L. F., Simmons, W. K. & Barsalou, L. W.. 2011. Grounding emotion in situated conceptualization. Neuropsychologia.
Wilson-Mendenhall, W. K., Simmons, , Martin, A. & Barsalou, L. W.. Under review. Contextual processing of abstract concepts reveals neural representations of relevant non-linguistic content.
Winer, B. J. 1971. Statistical principles in experimental design, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Wu, L. L. & Barsalou, L. W.. 2009. Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination: Evidence from property generation. Acta Psychologica 132. 173189.
Yap, M. J., Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J. & Watson, J. M.. 2006. Single versus dual process models of lexical decision performance: Insights from RT distributional analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32. 13241344.
Yeh, W. & Barsalou, L. W.. 2006. The situated nature of concepts. American Journal of Psychology 119. 349384.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Language and Cognition
  • ISSN: 1866-9808
  • EISSN: 1866-9859
  • URL: /core/journals/language-and-cognition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed