Skip to main content Accessibility help

A role for onomatopoeia in early language: evidence from phonological development



Onomatopoeia appear in high quantities in many infants’ earliest words, yet there is minimal research in this area. Instead, findings from the wider iconicity literature are generalised to include onomatopoeia, leading to the assumption that their iconic status makes them inherently learnable, thereby prompting their early production. In this review we bring together the literature on onomatopoeia specifically and iconicity more generally to consider infants’ acquisition from three perspectives: perception, production, and interaction. We consider these findings in relation to Imai and Kita’s (2014) ‘sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis’ to determine whether their framework can account for onomatopoeia alongside other iconic forms.


Corresponding author

*Centre for Language and Communication Research, Cardiff University, UK. E-mail:


Hide All
Abbott, D. (2004). Animal sounds. Online: <> (accessed 30 July 2018).
Demuth, K., Culbertson, J. & Alter, J. (2006). Word-minimality, epenthesis, and coda licensing in the acquisition of English. Language and Speech, 49, 137173.
Demuth, K. & Tremblay, A. (2008). Prosodically-conditioned variability in children’s production of French determiners. Journal of Child Language, 35, 99127.
Deuchar, M. & Quay, S. (2001). Bilingual acquisition: theoretical implications of a case study. Oxford University Press.
Dingemanse, M. (2012). Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Linguistics and Language Compass, 6, 654672.
Dingemanse, M. & Akita, K. (2017). An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: on the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese. Journal of Linguistics, 53, 501532.
Elsen, H. (1991). Erstspracherwerb: Der Erwerb des deutschen Lautsystems. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitaets Verlag.
Elsen, H. (1994). Phonological constraints and overextensions. First Language, 14, 305315.
Fenson, L., Dale, P. S., Reznick, J. S., Bates, E., Thal, D. J. & Pethick, S. J. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59, i185.
Fernald, A. & Morikawa, H. (1993). Common themes and cultural variations in Japanese and American mothers’ speech to infants. Child Development, 64, 637656.
Giard, M. H. & Peronnet, F. (1999). Auditory-visual integration during multimodal object recognition in humans: a behavioral and electrophysiological study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 473490.
Hashimoto, T., Usui, N., Taira, M., Nose, I., Haji, T. & Kojima, S. (2006). The neural mechanism associated with the processing of onomatopoeic sounds. NeuroImage, 31, 17621770.
Imai, M. & Kita, S. (2014). The sound symbolism bootstrapping hypothesis for language acquisition and language evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369. Online <>.
Imai, M., Kita, S., Nagumo, M. & Okada, H. (2008). Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning. Cognition, 109, 5465.
Jakobson, R. (1968). Child language, aphasia and phonological universals. The Hague: Mouton.
Kantartzis, K., Imai, M. & Kita, S. (2011). Japanese sound-symbolism facilitates word learning in English-speaking children. Cognitive Science, 35, 575586.
Kauschke, C. & Hofmeister, C. (2002). Early lexical development in German: a study on vocabulary growth and vocabulary composition during the second and third year of life. Journal of Child Language, 29, 735757.
Kauschke, C. & Klann-Delius, G. (2007). Characteristics of maternal input in relation to vocabulary development in children learning German. In Gülzow, I. & Gagarina, N. (eds.), Frequency effects in language acquisition: defining the limits of frequency as an explanatory concept (pp. 181204). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH.
Kent, R. D. (1992). The biology of phonological development. In Ferguson, C. A., Menn, L. & Stoel-Gammon, C. (eds.), Phonological development: models, research, implications (pp. 6590). Timonium, MD: York Press.
Kim, N. & Davis, B. L. (2015). A phonetic approach to consonant repetition in early words. Infant Behavior and Development, 40, 193203.
Kita, S. (1997). Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics, Linguistics, 35, 379415.
Kunnari, S. (2002). Word length in syllables: evidence from early word production in Finnish. First Language, 22, 119135.
Laing, C. E. (2014). A phonological analysis of onomatopoeia in early word production. First Language, 34, 387405.
Laing, C. E. (2017). A perceptual advantage for onomatopoeia in early word learning: evidence from eye-tracking. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 161, 3245.
Laing, C. E. (forthcoming). Phonological motivation for the acquisition of onomatopoeia: an analysis of early words. Language Learning and Development.
Laing, C. E., Vihman, M. & Keren-Portnoy, T. (2017). How salient are onomatopoeia in the early input? A prosodic analysis of infant-directed speech. Journal of Child Language, 44, 11171139.
Lockwood, G., Dingemanse, M. & Hagoort, P. (2016). Sound-symbolism boosts novel word learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 12741281.
MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Massaro, D. W. & Perlman, M. (2017). Quantifying iconicity’s contribution during language acquisition: implications for vocabulary learning. Frontiers in Communication, 2. Online <>.
Masuda, K. (2002). A phonetic study of sound symbolism. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, UK.
Mazuka, R., Kondo, T. & Hayashi, A. (2008). Japanese mothers’ use of specialised vocabulary in infant-directed speech: infant-directed vocabulary in Japanese. In Masataka, N. (Ed.), The origins of language: unravelling evolutionary forces (pp. 3958). Tokyo: Springer.
McLeod, S. & Crowe, K. (2018). Children’s consonant acquisition in 27 languages: a cross-linguistic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27, 15461571.
Menn, L. & Vihman, M. M. (2011). Features in child phonology: Inherent, emergent, or artefacts of analysis? In Clements, N. & Ridouane, R. (eds.), Where do phonological features come from? (pp. 261301). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Molholm, S., Ritter, W., Javitt, D. C. & Foxe, J. J. (2004). Multisensory visual-auditory object recognition in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 452465.
Ochs, E. & Schieffelin, B. (2009). Language acquisition and socialization: three developmental stories and their implications. In Duranti, A. (ed.), Linguistic anthropology: a reader (pp. 263301). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
Ortega, G. (2017). Iconicity and sign lexical acquisition: a review. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. Online <>.
Ozturk, O., Krehm, M. & Vouloumanos, A. (2013). Sound symbolism in infancy: evidence for sound-shape cross-modal correspondences in 4-month-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114, 173186.
Pačesová, J. (1968). The development of vocabulary in the child. Brno: Universita J. E. Purkyne.
Peeters, D. (2016). Processing consequences of onomatopoeic iconicity in spoken language comprehension. In Papafragou, A., Grodner, D., Mirman, D. & Trueswell, J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2016) (pp. 16321647). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Perniss, P., Lu, J. C., Morgan, G. & Vigliocco, G. (2018). Mapping language to the world: the role of iconicity in the sign language input. Developmental Science, 21, e12551. Online <>.
Perry, L. K., Perlman, M. & Lupyan, G. (2015). Iconicity in English and Spanish and its relation to lexical category and age of acquisition. PLoS ONE, 10, e0137147. Online <>.
Sasamoto, R. & Jackson, R. (2016). Onomatopoeia – showing-word or saying-word? Relevance theory, lexis, and the communication of impressions. Lingua, 175, 3653.
Stoel-Gammon, C. & Cooper, J. A. (1984). Patterns of early lexical and phonological development. Journal of Child Language, 11, 247271.
Tardif, T., Fletcher, P., Liang, W., Zhang, Z., Kaciroti, N. & Marchman, V. A. (2008). Baby’s first 10 words. Developmental Psychology, 44, 929938.
Thompson, R. L., Vinson, D. P., Woll, B. & Vigliocco, G. (2012). The road to language learning is iconic: evidence from British Sign Language. Psychological Science, 23, 14431448.
Tsujimura, N. (2005). Mimetic verbs and innovative verbs in the acquisition of Japanese. In Annual Meeting of the Berkley Linguistics Society (pp. 371382). Online <>.
Vihman, M. M. (1978). Consonant harmony: its scope and function in child language. In Greenberg, J. H. (ed.), Universals of human language (pp. 281334). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Vinson, D. P., Cormier, K., Denmark, T., Schembri, A. & Vigliocco, G. (2008). The British Sign Language (BSL) norms for age of acquisition, familiarity, and iconicity. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 10791087.
Werner, H. & Kaplan, B. (1963). Symbol formation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.


A role for onomatopoeia in early language: evidence from phonological development



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed