Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Unacceptable grammars? an eye-tracking study of English negative concord

  • FRANCES BLANCHETTE (a1) and CYNTHIA LUKYANENKO (a2)

Abstract

This paper uses eye-tracking while reading to examine Standard English speakers’ processing of sentences with two syntactic negations: a negative auxiliary and either a negative subject (e.g., Nothing didn’t fall from the shelf) or a negative object (e.g., She didn’t answer nothing in that interview). Sentences were read in Double Negation (DN; the ‘she answered something’ reading of she didn’t answer nothing) and Negative Concord (NC; the ‘she answered nothing’ reading of she didn’t answer nothing) biasing contexts. Despite the social stigma associated with NC, and linguistic assumptions that Standard English has a DN grammar, in which each syntactic negation necessarily contributes a semantic negation, our results show that Standard English speakers generate both NC and DN interpretations, and that their interpretation is affected by the syntactic structure of the negative sentence. Participants spent more time reading the critical sentence and rereading the context sentence when negative object sentences were paired with DN-biasing contexts and when negative subject sentences were paired with NC-biasing contexts. This suggests that, despite not producing NC, they find NC interpretations of negative object sentences easier to generate than DN interpretations. The results illustrate the utility of online measures when investigating socially stigmatized construction types.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address for correspondence: Frances Blanchette, Center for Language Science, Penn State, University Park, PA 16802. e-mail: fkb1@psu.edu

Footnotes

Hide All
*

A subset of these findings were presented at the 2019 meeting of the Linguistic Society of America. We gratefully acknowledge Katherine Muschler for her assistance running the study, Karen Miller for lending us her equipment, and the support of Penn State’s Center for Language Science. We are also grateful for comments and questions from three anonymous reviewers and our colleagues Laurel Brehm and Hossein Karimi, which have made this paper better.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Auwera, J., & Alsenoy, L. (2016). On the typology of Negative Concord. Studies in Language , 40, 473512.
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255278.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–10. Online <https://github.com/lme4/lme4pureR>.
Biberauer, T., & Zeijlstra, H. (2012). Negative Concord in Afrikaans: filling a typological gap. Journal of Semantics , 29, 345371.
Blanchette, F. (2013). Negative Concord in English. Linguistic Variation , 13, 147.
Blanchette, F. (2015). English Negative Concord, Negative Polarity and Double Negation . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, CUNY Graduate Center.
Blanchette, F. (2017). Micro-syntactic variation in English Negative Concord. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 2, 132.
Blanchette, F., & Nadeu, M. (2018). Prosody and the meanings of English negative indefinites. Journal of Pragmatics , 129, 123139.
Blanchette, F., Nadeu, M., Yeaton, J., & Déprez, V. (2018). English Negative Concord and Double Negation: the division of labor between syntax and pragmatics. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, 3(53), 115.
Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods , 41(4), 977990.
Collins, C., & Postal, P. (2014). Classical NEG raising: an essay on the syntax of negation . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Déprez, V, Tubau, S., Cheylus, A., & Espinal, M. T. (2015). Double Negation in a Negative Concord language: an experimental investigation. Lingua , 163, 75107.
Drenhaus, H., Saddy, D., & Frisch, S. (2005). Processing negative polarity items: when negation comes through the backdoor. In Kepser, S. & Reis, M. (eds.), Linguistic evidence: empirical, theoretical, and computational perspectives (pp. 145165). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Dussias, P. E. (2010). Uses of eye-tracking data in second language sentence processing research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , 30, 149166.
Espinal, M. T., & Prieto, P. (2011). Intonational encoding of Double Negation in Catalan. Journal of Pragmatics , 43, 23922410.
Espinal, M. T., Tubau, S., Borrás-Comes, J., & Prieto, P. (2016). Double Negation in Catalan and Spanish: interaction between syntax and prosody. In Larrivée, P. & Lee, C. (eds.), Negation and polarity: experimental perspectives (pp. 145176). Dordrecht: Springer.
Ferguson, H. J., Sanford, A. J., & Leuthold, H. (2008). Eye-movements and ERPs reveal the time course of processing negation and remitting counterfactual worlds. Brain Research, 1236, 113125.
Fischler, I., Bloom, P., Childers, D., Roucos, S. E., & Perry, N. W. (1983). Brain potentials related to stages of sentence verification. Psychophysiology, 20, 400409.
Fraundorf, S. (2017). Psycholing: R functions for common psycholinguistic and cognitive designs. Online <https://github.com/sfraundorf/psycholing>.
Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (2011). Quantifiers undone: reversing predictable speech errors in comprehension. Language , 87, 158171.
Geurts, B. (1998). The mechanisms of denial. Language, 74, 274307.
Giannakidou, A. (1998). Polarity sensitivity as (non)veridical dependency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Giannakidou, A. (2000). Negative … Concord? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory , 18, 457523.
Gordon, P., Hendrick, R., Johnson, M., & Lee, Y. (2006). Similarity-based interference during language comprehension: evidence from eye tracking during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 32(6), 13041321.
Green, L. (2002). African American English: a linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Green, L. (2014). Force, focus and negation in African American English. In Zanuttini, R. & Horn, L. R. (eds.), Micro-syntactic variation in North American English (pp. 115142). New York: Oxford University Press.
Haegeman, L., & Zanuttini, R. (1996). Negative Concord in West Flemish. In Belletti, A. & Rizzi, L. (eds.), Parameters and functional heads (pp. 117179). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Herburger, E. (2001). The Negative Concord puzzle revisited. Natural Language Semantics, 9, 233289.
Horn, L. (1989 [2001]). A natural history of negation. Chicago: CSLI Publications.
Horn, L. (2010). Multiple negation in English and other languages. In Horn, L. (ed.) The expression of cognitive categories: expression of negation (pp. 117148). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Jespersen, O. (1917). Negation in English and other languages. Copenhagen: A. F. Høst.
Juhasz, B. J., White, S. J., Liversedge, S. P., & Rayner, K. (2008). Eye movements and the use of parafoveal word length information in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(6), 15691579.
Kaup, B., Lüdtke, J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2007). The experiential view of language comprehension: How is negation represented? In Schmalhofer, F. & Perretti, C. A. (eds.), Higher level language processes in the brain: inference and comprehension processes (pp. 255288). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kaup, B., Yaxley, R., Madden, C. J., Zwaan, R. A., & Lüdtke, J. (2007). Experiential simulations of negated text information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(7), 976990.
Keren, E.-H. (2015). From negative polarity to negative concord – Slavic footprints in the diachronic change of Hebrew meʔuma, klum, and sum davar. Journal of Jewish Languages, 3, 183198.
Ladusaw, W. A. (1979). Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations . Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas. Published, New York: Garland (1980).
Lippi-Green, L. (1997). English with an accent . London: Routledge.
Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, H., & Bates, D. (2017). Balancing Type 1 error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 305315.
Nevalainen, T. (1998). Social mobility and the decline of Multiple Negation in Early Modern English. In Fisiak, J. and Krygier, M. (eds.), Advances in English historical linguistics (1996) (pp. 263291). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Nieuwland, M. S., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2008). When the truth is not too hard to handle: an event-related potential study on the pragmatics of negation. Psychological Science, 19(12), 12131218.
Noh, E.-J., Choo, H., & Koh, S. (2013). Processing metalinguistic negation: evidence from eye-tracking experiments. Journal of Pragmatics, 57, 118.
Orenes, I., Beltrán, D., & Santamaría, C. (2014). How negation is understood: evidence from the visual world paradigm. Journal of Memory and Language , 74, 3645.
Orenes, I., Moxey, L., Scheepers, C., & Santamaría, C. (2016). Negation in context: evidence from the visual world paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(6), 10821092.
Parker, D., & Phillips, C. (2016). Negative polarity illusions and the format of hierarchical encodings in memory. Cognition, 157, 321339.
Phillips, C., Wagers, M. W., & Lau, E. F. (2011). Grammatical illusions and selective fallibility in real-time language comprehension. In Runner, J. (ed.), Experiments at the interfaces (Syntax & Semantics, Vol. 37). Bingley: Emerald Publications.
Plato, (1937 [c.360 bc]). The Sophist, Jowett., trans. B. New York: Random House.
Prieto, P., Borràs-Comes, J., Tubau, S., & Espinal, M. T. (2013). Prosody and gesture constrain the interpretation of double negation. Lingua, 131, 136150.
Puskás, G. (2012). Licensing Double Negation in NC and non-NC languages. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory , 30, 611649.
R Core Team. (2017). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna. Online<http://www.R-project.org>
Rayner, K. (1994). Eye movements during skilled reading. In Ygge, J. & Lennerstrand, G. (eds.), Eye movements in reading (pp. 205218). New York: Elsevier.
Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 14571506.
Reinhart, T. M. (1976). The syntactic domain of anaphora. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Schiller, N. O., van Lenteren, L., Witteman, J., Ouwehand, K., Band, G. P. H., & Verhagen, A. (2017). Solving the problem of double negation is not impossible: electrophysiological evidence for the cohesive function of sentential negation. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 32(2), 147157.
Smith, J. (2001). Negative concord in the Old and New World: evidence from Scotland. Language Variation and Change , 13, 109134.
Terry, J. M., Hendrick, R., Evangelou, E., & Smith, R. L. (2010). Variable dialect switching among African American children: inferences about working memory. Lingua , 120, 24632475.
Tesan, G., Johnson, B. W., & Crain, S. (2012). How the brain responds to any: an MEG study. Brain & Language, 120, 6672.
Tettamanti, M., Manenti, R., Della Rosa, P. A., Falini, A., Perani, D., Cappa, S. F., & Moro, A. (2008). Negation in the brain: modulating action representations. NeuroImage , 43, 358367.
Thornton, R., Notley, A., Moscati, V., & Crain, S. (2016). Two negations for the price of one. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics , 45, 130.
Tian, Y., & Breheny, R. (2016). Dynamic pragmatic view of negation processing. In Larrivée, P. & Lee, C. (eds.), Negation and polarity: experimental perspectives (pp. 2144). Heidelberg: Springer.
Tian, Y., Ferguson, H., & Breheny, R. (2016). Processing negation without context – why and when we represent the positive argument. Language, Cognition, & Neuroscience, 31(5), 683698.
Tortora, C., & Den Dikken, M. (2010). Subject agreement variation: support for the configurational approach. Lingua , 120, 10891108.
Vasishth, S., Brüssow, S., Lewis, R. L., & Drenhaus, H. (2008). Processing polarity: how the ungrammatical intrudes on the grammatical. Cognitive Science, 32, 685712.
Wason, P. C. (1959). The processing of positive and negative information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 92107.
Wolfram, W., & Christian, D. (1976). Appalachian speech . Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Wolfram, W., & Fasold, R. (1974). The study of social dialects in American English. New York: Prentice Hall.
Xiang, M., Dillon, B., & Phillips, C. (2009). Illusory licensing effects across dependency types: ERP evidence. Brain & Language, 108, 4055.
Xiang, M., Grove, J., & Giannakidou, A. (2013). Dependency-dependent interference: NPI interference, agreement attraction, and global pragmatic inferences. Frontiers in Psychology 4, article 708. Online <https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00708>.
Zanuttini, R. (1997). Negation and clausal structure: a comparative study of Romance languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zeijlstra, H. (2004). Sentential negation and negative concord . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Zeijlstra, H. (2008). On the syntactic flexibility of formal features. In Biberauer, T. (ed.), The limits of syntax (pp. 143174). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed