Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:47:08.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Erving Goffman, Relations in public: microstudies of the public order. New York: Basic Books, 1971. Pp. xvii + 396.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

John Fought
Affiliation:
Linguistics DepartmentUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1961 a). Asylums. New York: Doubleday-Anchor.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1961 b). Encounters. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1963 a). Behavior in public places. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1963 b). Stigma. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1964). The neglected situation. In Gumperz, J. and Hymes, D. (eds), The ethnography of communication. American Anthropologist. (AmA 66 (6) pt 2.) Washington, D.C.: American Anthropological Association. 133–6.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual. New York: Doubleday-Anchor.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1969). Strategic interaction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1967). Models of the interaction of language and social setting. Journal of social issues, 23 (2). 828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. [1957] (1972). Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. Selected writings, vol. 2. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1970). The study of language in its social context. Studium generale, 23, 3087.Google Scholar