Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-2c8nx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-19T05:12:14.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From expressing solidarity to mocking on Twitter: Pragmatic functions of hashtags starting with #jesuis across languages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2018

Barbara De Cock  and
Andrea Pizarro Pedraza
Barbara De Cock*
Affiliation:
Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium
Andrea Pizarro Pedraza*
Affiliation:
Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium
*
Address for correspondence: Barbara De Cock & Andrea Pizarro Pedraza Université catholique de Louvain Place Blaise Pascal 1, bte L3.03.33 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve Belgiumbarbara.decock@uclouvain.beandrea.pizarro@uclouvain.be
Address for correspondence: Barbara De Cock & Andrea Pizarro Pedraza Université catholique de Louvain Place Blaise Pascal 1, bte L3.03.33 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve Belgiumbarbara.decock@uclouvain.beandrea.pizarro@uclouvain.be
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, we show how the hashtag #jesuisCharlie, created following the attack on Charlie Hebdo, gave rise to the use of many other hashtags starting with #jesuis, across languages. Through a corpus-based analysis, we show how the meaning of #jesuis broadened from expressing condolence and support following terrorist attacks over expressing condolence for other (violent) deaths to a more general marker of solidarity and alignment. This broadening of meaning is parallel to a formal evolution of the stem jesuis. Moreover, these hashtags have become emblematic of a particular kind of Twitter user. Furthermore, disaligning uses developed, including mocking uses, which disalign both with certain causes (disalignment de re) and with the process of using jesuis as a means of expressing solidarity (disalignment de dicto). Thus, this variety of uses shows that Twitter users exploit the interpersonal possibilities of hashtags to express alignment and disalignment, creating ambient affiliation. (Hashtag, #jesuisCharlie, solidarity, alignment, emblem, mocking, pragmatic functions)*

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , April 2018 , pp. 197 - 217
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

We are grateful to two anonymous referees and the editor for their comments and suggestions, as well as to Sandrine Roginsky and Katrien Verveckken for sharing their comments concerning (parts of) a previous version of this article. We would like to thank Chiara Meluzzi for her help concerning the Italian example, Minna Nevala for her help concerning the Finnish example, and Deniz Uygur for her help concerning the Turkish example. All remaining errors are of course our responsibility.

References

REFERENCES

Agha, Asif (2007). Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
An, Jisun; Kwak, Haewoon; Mejova, Yelena; Saenz De Oger, Sonia Alonso; & Fortes, Braulio Gomez (2016). Are you Charlie or Ahmed? Cultural pluralism in Charlie Hebdo response on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 10th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM), Cologne, Germany. Palo Alto, CA: The AAAI Press.Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore, & Raskin, Victor (1991). Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model. Humor 4(3):293–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badouard, Romain (2015). ‘Je ne suis pas Charlie’: Pluralité des prises de parole sur le web et les réseaux sociaux. In Lefébure, Pierre & Sécail, Claire (eds.), Le défi Charlie: Les médias à l’épreuve des attentats, 187–220. Paris: Lemieux.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie (1983). English word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazin, Maëlle (2015). L’énonciation d'un deuil national: Usages de ‘Je suis Charlie’ dans les écritures urbaines. In Lefébure, Pierre & Sécail, Claire (eds.), Le défi Charlie: Les médias à l’épreuve des attentats, 153–86. Paris: Lemieux.Google Scholar
boyd, danah (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Papacharissi, Zizi (ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites, 39–58. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bruns, Axel, & Burgess, Jean E. (2011). The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. In Proceedings of the 6th European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) General Conference 2011, University of Iceland, Reykjavik. Colchester: European Consortium for Political Research.Google Scholar
Clift, Rebecca (1999). Irony in conversation. Language in Society 28:523–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coesemans, Roel, & Cock, Barbara De (2017). Self-reference by politicians on Twitter: Strategies to adapt to 140 characters. Journal of Pragmatics 116:37–50. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Lucena Ito, Liliane (2015). CharlieHebdo: A repercussão ampliada em memes e hashtags. In Romancini, Ricardo & Vassallo de Lopes, Maria Immacolata (eds.), Anais do XIV congresso Ibero-Americano de comunicação IBERCOM 2015: Comunicação, cultura e mídias sociais, 2015, 3321–31. São Paulo: ECA-USP.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul (1987). Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics 25:219–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giaxoglou, Korina (2015). Entextualising mourning on Facebook: Stories of grief as acts of sharing. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 21(1–2):87–105. Online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13614568.2014.983560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giglietto, Fabio, & Lee, Yenn (2017). A hashtag worth a thousand words: Discursive strategies around #JeNeSuisPasCharlie after the 2015 Charlie Hebdo shooting. Social Media + Society 3(1):1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1963). Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Hermida, Alfred (2010). From TV to Twitter: How ambient news became ambient journalism. M/C Journal. A Journal of Media and Culture 13(2). Online: http://www.journal.media-culture.org.au/index.php/mcjournal/article/view/220.Google Scholar
Heyd, Theresa, & Puschmann, Cornelius (2017). Hashtagging and functional shift: Adaptation and appropriation of the #. Journal of Pragmatics 116:51–63. Online: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.12.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, Ian (2001). Conversation and technology: From the telephone to the internet. Cambridge: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hutchby, Ian (2014). Communicative affordances and participation frameworks in mediated interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 72:86–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
La Libre, Belgique (2016). Récupéré par le marketing, le hashtag perd-t-il son sens? Issue of May 27th, 2016, 50–51.Google Scholar
Mancera, Ana, & Pano, Ana (2013). El discurso político en twitter: Análisis de mensajes que “trinan”. Barcelona: Anthropos.Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob L. (2001). Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Naets, Hubert (2018). Techniques de collecte et d'archivage des tweets: Partage de pratiques et d'outils. In Actes des 16es Journées des Archives, Pérenniser l’éphémère: Archivage et médias sociaux. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain, to appear.Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal (1993). Conversational joking: Humour in everyday talk. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Panović, Ivan (2016). How to say ‘No!’ in Egypt: Evidence from a Facebook campaign. Paper presented at Sociolinguistics Symposium 21. University of Murcia.Google Scholar
Papacharissi, Zizi (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Paveau, Marie-Anne (2013). Technodiscursivités natives sur Twitter: Une écologie du discours numérique. Epistémé (Revue internationale de sciences humaines et sociales appliquées) 9:136–76.Google Scholar
Pizarro Pedraza, Andrea, & Cock, Barbara De (2018). Non-conforming uses of #jesuisCharlie and derived hashtags on Twitter. In Cougnon, Louise-Amélie, Cock, Barbara De, & Fairon, Cédrick (eds.), Language and the new (instant) media. Cahiers du Cental 9. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain, to appear.Google Scholar
Raskin, Victor (1985). Semantic mechanisms of humor. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Roginsky, Sandrine, & Cock, Barbara De (2015). Faire campagne sur Twitter. Modalités d’énonciation et mises en récit des candidats à l’élection européenne. Les Cahiers du Numérique 11(4):119–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubba, Jo (1996). Alternate grounds in the interpretation of deictic expressions. In Fauconnier, Gilles & Sweetser, Eve (eds.), Spaces, worlds and grammars, 227–61. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schwell, Alexandra (2015). #MuslimRage: When Western fears meet political humor. Ethnologia Europea 45(2):85–101.Google Scholar
Smyrnaios, Nikos, & Ratinaud, Pierre (2017). The Charlie Hebdo attacks on Twitter: A comparative analysis of a political controversy in English and French. Social Media + Society 3(1):1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumiala, Johanna; Tikka, Minttu; Huhtamäki, Jukka; & Valaskivi, Katja (2016). #JeSuisCharlie: Towards a multi-method study of hybrid media events. Media and Communication 4(4):97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wikström, Peter (2014). #srynotfunny: Communicative functions of hashtags on Twitter. SKY Journal of Linguistics 27:127–52.Google Scholar
Wischer, Ilse (2000). Grammaticalization versus lexicalization: ‘Methinks’ there is some confusion. In Fischer, Olga, Rosenbach, Anette, & Stein, Dieter (eds.), Pathways of change: Grammaticalization in English, 355–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, Mutsumi (1999). Animacy and reference: A cognitive approach to corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele (2011). Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. New Media & Society 13(5):788–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele (2012). Discourse of Twitter and social media: How we use language to create affiliation on the web. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele (2014). Ambient affiliation in microblogging: Boarding around the quotidian. Media International Australia 151:97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele (2015). Searchable talk: The linguistic functions of hashtags. Social Semiotics 25(3):274–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar