Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-5mwv9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-21T19:38:33.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Making multiple requests in French and Finnish convenience stores

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2016

Lorenza Mondada  and
Marja-Leena Sorjonen
Lorenza Mondada*
Affiliation:
University of Basel, Switzerland
Marja-Leena Sorjonen
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki, Switzerland
*
Address for correspondence: Lorenza Mondada, Department of Linguistics and Literature/French Studies, University of Basel, Maiengasse 51, Basel 4056, Switzerlandlorenza.mondada@unibas.ch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article systematically explores the sequential contexts for making multiple requests during shop encounters. Based on video recordings in convenience stores in France and Finland, it describes the multimodal practices that buyers and sellers use to treat multiple requests as progressively building a global buying project. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate how multiple requests can be packed together, as relatively simple actions achieved simultaneously or successively in embodied and verbal ways either as subsequent contiguous sequences of actions, or as sequences of actions separated by inserted actions. This article also examines how requests are tied together, and how ‘late’ requests are fitted to the last sequential opportunities in the unfolding encounter. This analysis contributes to the study of commercial encounters and the buying process, as well as to the understanding of sequence organization. It likewise contributes to comparative analyses by discussing the similarities and specificities of this activity across cultural contexts and in different time periods. (Requests, shop encounters, social interaction, multimodality, French, Finnish)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 45 , Issue 5 , November 2016 , pp. 733 - 765
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana; House, Juliane; & Kasper, Gabriele (eds.) (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, & Levinson, Stephen C.. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Curl, Tracy, & Drew, Paul (2008). Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41:129–53.Google Scholar
Dausendschön-Gay, Ulrich, & Krafft, Ulrich (2009). Preparing next actions in routine activities. Discourse Processes 46(2–3):247–68.Google Scholar
De Stefani, Elwys (2011). “Ah petta ecco, io prendo questi che mi piacciono”. Agire come coppia al supermercato. Un approccio conversazionale e multimodale allo studio dei processi decisionali. Roma: Aracne.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul (2013). Turn design. In Sidnell, Jack & Stivers, Tanya (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, 131–49. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, & Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (eds.) (2014). Requesting in social interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan M. (1976). Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives. Language in Society 5:25–66.Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara, & Heinemann, Trine (2016). Rethinking format: An examination of requests. Language in Society 45(4):1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32:1489–1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness, & Cekaite, Asta (2014). Orchestrating directive trajectories in communicative projects in family interaction. In Drew & Couper-Kuhlen, 181–210.Google Scholar
Haakana, Markku, & Sorjonen, Marja-Leena (2011). Invoking another context: Playfulness in buying lottery tickets at convenience stores. Journal of Pragmatics 43:1288–1302.Google Scholar
Haddington, Pentti; Keisanen, Tiina; Mondada, Lorenza; & Nevile, Maurice (eds.) (2014). Multiactivity in social interaction: Beyond multitasking. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Heineman, Trine (2006). ‘Will you or can't you?’: Displaying entitlement in interrogative requests. Journal of Pragmatics 38:1081–104.Google Scholar
Heritage, John, & Sorjonen, Marja-Leena (1994). Constituting and maintaining activities across sequences: and-prefacing as a feature of question design. Language in Society 23:1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koivisto, Aino, & Halonen, Mia (2009). Maksaminen osana R-kioskiasiointia [Paying as part of convenience store encounters]. In Lappalainen & Raevaara, 120–52.Google Scholar
Lappalainen, Hanna, & Raevaara, Liisa (eds.) (2009). Kieli kioskilla: Tutkimuksia kioskiasioinnin rutiineista [Talk at convenience stores: Studies on the routines in convenience store encounters]. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen (2013). Action formation and ascription. In Sidnell, Jack & Stivers, Tanya (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, 103–30. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lindström, Anna (2005). Language as social action: A study of how senior citizens request assistance with practical tasks in the Swedish home help service. In Hakulinen, Auli & Selting, Margret (eds.), Syntax and lexis in conversation, 209–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W.; Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke; Schaeffer, Nora Cate; & van der Zouwen, Johannes (eds.) (2002). Standardization and tacit knowledge: Interaction and practice in the survey interview. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
McNeill, David (1992). Hand and mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merritt, Marilyn (1976). On questions following questions in service encounters. Language in Society 5:315–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza (2011). The situated organisation of directives in French: Imperatives and action coordination in video games. Nottingham French Studies 50:19–50.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza (2014a). Requesting immediate action in the surgical operating room: Time, embodied resources and praxeological embeddedness. In Drew & Couper-Kuhlen, 269–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza (2014b). The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 65:137–56.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor; Schegloff, Emanuel A.; & Thompson, Sandra A. (eds.) (1996). Grammar and interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ogden, Richard, & Routarinne, Sara (2005). The communicative functions of final rises in Finnish intonation. Phonetica 62:160–75.Google Scholar
Raevaara, Liisa (2011). Accounts at convenience stores: Doing dispreference and small talk. Journal of Pragmatics 43:556–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Jeffrey D. (2003). An interactional structure of medical activities during acute visits and its implications for patients’ participation. Health Communication 15:27–59.Google Scholar
Rossi, Giovanni (2012). Bilateral and unilateral requests: The use of imperatives and Mi X? interrogatives in Italian. Discourse Processes 49:426–58.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey (1992). Lectures on conversation, vol. 1. Ed. by Jefferson, Gail. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Salgado, Elizabeth Flores (2011). The pragmatics of requests and apologies: Developmental patterns of Mexican students. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret (2007). Lists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction as an interactional resource. Journal of Pragmatics 39:483–526.Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack (2007). Comparative studies in conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology 36:229–44.Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack, & Enfield, Nick (2012). Language diversity and social action: A third locus of linguistic relativity. Current Anthropology 53:302–33.Google Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, & Raevaara, Liisa (2014). On the grammatical form of requests at the convenience store: Requesting as embodied action. In Drew & Couper-Kuhlen, 243–68.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya; Enfield, Nick J.; & Levinson, Stephen C. (eds.) (2010). Question-response sequences in 10 languages. Special issue of Journal of Pragmatics 43.Google Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen; Goodwin, Charles; & LeBaron, Curtis (eds.) (2011). Embodied interaction, language and body in the material world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Toerien, Merran, & Kitzinger, Celia (2007). Emotional labour in action: Navigating multiple involvements in the beauty salon. Sociology 41:4:645–62.Google Scholar
Vine, Bernadette (2004). Getting things done at work: The discourse of power in workplace interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinkhuyzen, Erik, & Szymanski, Margaret H. (2005). Would you like to do it yourself? Service requests and their non-granting responses. In Richards, Keith & Seedhouse, Paul (eds.), Applying conversation analysis, 91–106. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wootton, Anthony J. (1997). Interaction and the development of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Don H. (1992). The interactional organization of calls for emergency assistance. In Drew, Paul & Heritage, John (eds.), Talk at work, 418–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zinken, Jörg, & Ogiermann, Eva (2013). Responsibility and action: Invariants and diversity in requests for objects in British English and Polish interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 46:256–76.Google Scholar