Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-zlgnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T12:17:02.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sex-based differences in compliment behavior1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Robert K. Herbert
Robert K. Herbert
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, State University of New York, Binghamton and University of the Witwatersrand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sex-based differences in the form of English compliments and in the frequencies of various compliment response types are discussed. Based on a corpus of 1,062 compliment events, several differences in the form of compliments used by women and men are noted. Further, it is found that compliments from men are generally accepted, especially by female recipients, whereas compliments from women are met with a response type other than acceptance. These findings are set within a broader discussion of male–female differences in speech and the sociology of compliment work. Parallels are drawn between these sex-based differences and differences in norms for national varieties of English relating to the function and frequency of compliments as speech acts and to different response types elicited by diverse functional exploitations of compliment formulas in discourse. (Sex-based differences in language use, socioprag-matics, compliments/compliment responses, ethnography of speaking)

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 1990 , pp. 201 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Apte, M. L. (1974). “Thank you” and South Asian languages: A comparative sociolinguistic study. Linguistics 136:67–89.Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Goody, E. N. (ed.), Questions and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 56–289.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. (1985). Feminism and linguistic theory. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, P. (1980). Conversational insecurity. In Giles, H., Robinson, W. P., & Smith, P. (eds.), Language: Social psychological perspectives. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon. 127–32.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. H. (1980). Directive-response speech sequences in girls' and boys' task activities. In McConnell-Ginet, S. et al. (eds.), Women and language in literature and society. New York: Praeger. 157–73.Google Scholar
Goody, E. N. (1978). Toward a theory of questions. In Goody, E. (ed.), Questions and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 17–43.Google Scholar
Herbert, R. K. (1986). Say “thank you” – Or something. American Speech 61:76–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, R. K. (1989). The ethnography of English compliments and compliment responses: A contrastive sketch. In Oleksy, W. (ed.), Contrastive pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 3–35.Google Scholar
Herbert, R. K. (in press). The sociology compliment work: An ethnocontrastive study of Polish and English compliments. Multilingua.Google Scholar
Herbert, R. K., & Straight, H. S. (1989). Compliment-rejection vs. compliment-avoidance. Language and Communication 9:35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. (1984). Women's language: A functional approach. General Linguistics 24:149–78.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (1988a). Compliments and compliment responses in New Zealand English. Anthropological Linguistics 28:485–508.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (1988b). Paying compliments: A sex-preferential positive politeness strategy. Journal of Pragmatics 12:445–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J., & Brown, D. (1987). Teachers and students learning about compliments. TESOL Quarterly 24:523–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (1987). La description des échanges en analyse conversationnelle: L'exemple du compliment. DRLAV – Revue de Linguistique 36–37:1–53.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman's place. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Manes, J. (1983). Compliments: A mirror of cultural values. In Wolfson, N. & Judd, E. (eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 96–102.Google Scholar
Manes, J., & Wolfson, N. (1980). The compliment formula. In Coulmas, F. (ed.), Conversational routine. The Hague: Mouton. 115–32.Google Scholar
Marandin, J. M. (1987). Des mots et des actions: “compliment,” “complimenter” et l'action de complimenter. Lexique 5:65–99.Google Scholar
Norrick, N. (1980). The speech act of complimenting. In Hovdhaugen, E. (ed.), The Nordic languages and modern linguistics. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. 296–304.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, A. (1978). Compliment responses: Notes on the co-operation of multiple constraints. In Schenkein, J. (ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York: Academic. 79–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preisler, B. (1986). Linguistic sex roles in conversation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E., & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica VIII(4):289–327.Google Scholar
Smith, P. (1985). Language, the sexes and society. New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Strecker, I. (1988). The social practice of symbolization. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Swacker, M. (1976). Women's verbal behavior at learned and professional conferences. In Dubois, B. L. & Crouch, I. (eds.), The sociology of the languages of American women. San Antonio, TX: Trinity University. 155–60.Google Scholar
Wolfson, N. (1981). Compliments in cross-cultural perspective. TESOL Quarterly 15:117–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, N. (1983). An empirically based analysis of complimenting in English. In Wolfson, N. & Judd, E. (eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. 82–95.Google Scholar
Wolfson, N. (1984). Pretty is as pretty does: A speech act view of sex roles. Applied Linguistics 5:236–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, N. (1988). The bulge: A theory of speech behavior and social distance. In Fine, J. (ed.), Second language discourse: A textbook of current research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 21–38.Google Scholar
Wolfson, N., & Manes, J. (1980). The compliment as a social strategy. Papers in Linguistics 13:391–410.Google Scholar
Young, J. H. (1882). Our deportment: The manner, conduct, and dress of the most refined society. Springfield, MA: W. C. King.Google Scholar