Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 55
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Bailey, April H. and LaFrance, Marianne 2016. Who Counts as Human? Antecedents to Androcentric Behavior. Sex Roles,

    Doherty, Alice and Conklin, Kathy 2016. How gender-expectancy affects the processing of “them”. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, p. 1.

    Erdmann, Susan 2015. A third space: discursive realizations of immigrant identity. Language and Intercultural Communication, Vol. 15, Issue. 4, p. 475.

    Lee, Jackie F.K. 2015. Chairperson or chairman? – A study of Chinese EFL teachers’ gender inclusivity. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 38, Issue. 1, p. 24.

    Motschenbacher, Heiko 2015. Gender Across Languages.

    Thorne, Sapphira Hegarty, Peter and Catmur, Caroline 2015. Is the left hemisphere androcentric? Evidence of the learned categorical perception of gender. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, Vol. 20, Issue. 5, p. 571.

    Edelman, Elijah Adiv and Zimman, Lal 2014. Boycunts and Bonus Holes: Trans Men’s Bodies, Neoliberalism, and the Sexual Productivity of Genitals. Journal of Homosexuality, Vol. 61, Issue. 5, p. 673.

    Lee, Jackie F.K. 2014. Gender representation in Hong Kong primary school ELT textbooks – a comparative study. Gender and Education, Vol. 26, Issue. 4, p. 356.

    Hegarty, Peter and Lemieux, Anthony F. 2011. Spatial Dimensions of Social Thought.

    Hegarty, Peter Watson, Nila Fletcher, Laura and McQueen, Grant 2011. When gentlemen are first and ladies are last: Effects of gender stereotypes on the order of romantic partners' names. British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 50, Issue. 1, p. 21.

    Pauwels, Anne 2011. Planning for a global lingua franca: challenges for feminist language planning in English(es) around the world. Current Issues in Language Planning, Vol. 12, Issue. 1, p. 9.

    Lee, Jackie F.K. and Collins, Peter 2009. Australian English‐language textbooks: the gender issues. Gender and Education, Vol. 21, Issue. 4, p. 353.

    Lee, Jackie F. K. 2007. Acceptability of Sexist Language among Young People in Hong Kong. Sex Roles, Vol. 56, Issue. 5-6, p. 285.

    Sanford, Anthony J. and Filik, Ruth 2007. “They” as a gender-unspecified singular pronoun: Eye tracking reveals a processing cost. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 60, Issue. 2, p. 171.

    Pauwels, Anne and Winter, Joanne 2006. Gender Inclusivity or ‘Grammar Rules OK’? Linguistic Prescriptivism vs Linguistic Discrimination in the Classroom. Language and Education, Vol. 20, Issue. 2, p. 128.

    Silverstein, Michael 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication, Vol. 23, Issue. 3-4, p. 193.

    Ross, Christine 2002. Logic, rhetoric, and discourse in the literary texts of nineteenth‐century women. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, Vol. 32, Issue. 2, p. 85.

    Curzan, Anne 2000. Gender in Grammar and Cognition.

    Wong, Andrew and Zhang, Qing 2000. The Linguistic Construction of the Tongzhi Community. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, Vol. 10, Issue. 2, p. 248.

    Stringer, Jeffrey L. and Hopper, Robert 1998. Generichein conversation?. Quarterly Journal of Speech, Vol. 84, Issue. 2, p. 209.


Androcentrism in prescriptive grammar: singular ‘they’, sex-indefinite ‘he’, and ‘he or she’1

  • Ann Bodine (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 18 December 2008

This paper demonstrates that prior to the beginning of the prescriptive grammar movement in English, singular ‘they’ was both accepted and widespread. It is argued that the prescriptive grammarians' attack on singular ‘they’ was socially motivated, and the specific reasons for their attack are discussed. By analogy with socially motivated changes in second person pronouns in a variety of European languages, it is suggested that third person pronoun usage will be affected by the current feminist opposition to sex-indefinite ‘he’ – particularly since the well-established alternative, singular ‘they’, has remained widespread in spoken English throughout the two and a half centuries of its ‘official’ proscription. Finally, the implications of changes in third person singular, sex-indefinite pronouns for several issues of general interest within linguistics are explored. (Language change, sex roles and language, language attitudes, language planning, prescriptive grammar, pronouns.)

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

A. D. Grimshaw (19732013;1974). On language and society: parts I and II. Contemporary Society 2 (6). 575–83; 3 (1). 3–11.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Language in Society
  • ISSN: 0047-4045
  • EISSN: 1469-8013
  • URL: /core/journals/language-in-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *