Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Assessing levels of endangerment in the Catalogue of Endangered Languages (ELCat) using the Language Endangerment Index (LEI)

  • Nala Huiying Lee (a1) and John Van Way (a2)
Abstract

The Catalogue of Endangered Languages (ELCat) is the central feature of the Google-powered Endangered Languages Project (endangeredlanguages.com), which is a venue for sharing information and resources on the world's endangered languages and the knowledge contained in them. One key feature of ELCat is a quantitative measure that can be used to understand the level of endangerment of any language. Quantitative measurements are needed to compare language vitality across a variety of contexts around the globe, and can be used as a parallel to measurements of other forms of threats to biocultural diversity. This article addresses the development of the Language Endangerment Index (LEI). Based on four factors (intergenerational transmission, absolute number of speakers, speaker number trends, and domains of use), this index is different from other methods of assessment in several ways, especially as it can be used even if limited information is available. (Language endangerment, vitality, intergenerational transmission, speaker numbers, domains of language use)*

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Assessing levels of endangerment in the Catalogue of Endangered Languages (ELCat) using the Language Endangerment Index (LEI)
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Assessing levels of endangerment in the Catalogue of Endangered Languages (ELCat) using the Language Endangerment Index (LEI)
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Assessing levels of endangerment in the Catalogue of Endangered Languages (ELCat) using the Language Endangerment Index (LEI)
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Aragon, Carolina (2013). Phonetic realization of medial stop consonants in Akuntsú. Working Papers in Linguistics 44(1):114. Mānoa: University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa.
Basu, Arabinda (1991). Small tribal populations: Observed patterns of fertility and mortality. In Saraswati, Baidyanath (ed.), Tribal thought and culture: Essays in honour of Surajit Chandra Sinha, 169–82. New Delhi: Ashok Kumar Mittal Concept.
Blust, Robert (2003). Thao dictionary. Taipei: Academica Sinica, Institute of Ethnology.
Brenzinger, Matthias (2011). The twelve modern Khoisan languages. In Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena & Ernszt, Martina (eds.), Khoisan languages and linguistics: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium. July 6–10, 2008, Riezlern/Kleinwalsertal, 1–32. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
Caffery, Josephine (2010). Central Australian endangered languages: So what? Dialogue (Academy of Social Sciences in Australia) 29:7886.
Campbell, Lyle; Lee, Nala Huiying; Okura, Eve; Simpson, Sean; Ueki, Kaori; & Van Way, John (2013). New knowledge: Findings from the Catalogue of Endangered Languages (ELCat). Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Language Documentation and Conservation. February 28–March 3, 2013, University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa.
Crevels, Miy (2012). Language endangerment in South America: The clock is ticking. In Campbell, Lyle & Grondona, Veronica (eds.), The indigenous languages of South America: A comprehensive guide, 176234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Crystal, David (2000). Language death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dwyer, Arienne M. (2011). Tools and techniques for endangered-language assessment and revitalization: Vitality and viability of minority languages. Proceedings of the Trace Foundation Lecture Series, October 23–24, 2009, New York. Online: https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/dspace/bitstream/1808/7109/1/Dwyer2011_AssessRevitalize.pdf.
Evans, Nicholas (2010). Dying words: Endangered languages and what they have to tell us. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Fenelon, James V., & Hall, Thomas D. (2008). Revitalization and indigenous resistance to globalization and neoliberalism. American Behavioral Scientist 51:1867–901.
Fishman, Joshua (1965). Who speaks what language to whom and when? La Linguistique 1(2):6788.
Fishman, Joshua (1987). Language spread and language policy for endangered languages. In Peter H. Lowenburg, Proceedings of the Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics, 115. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Fishman, Joshua (1991). Reversing language shift. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters.
Golla, Victor; Goddard, Ives; Campbell, Lyle; Mithun, Marianne; & Mixco, Maurico (2008). North America. In Asher, Ronald E. & Moseley, Christopher (eds.), Atlas of the world's languages, 2nd edn, 741. London: Routledge.
Gorenflo, Larry J.; Romaine, Suzanne; Mittermeier;, Russell A. & Walker-Painemilla, Kristen (2012). Co-occurrence of linguistic and biological diversity in biodiversity hotspots and high biodiversity wilderness areas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109(21):8032–37.
Hale, Kenneth (1992). Language endangerment and the human value of linguistic diversity. Language 68:3542.
Hara, Kiyoshi (2005). Regional dialect and cultural development in Japan and Europe. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 175/176:193211.
Haspelmath, Martin (2012). Should linguistic diversity be conserved like biodiversity? Online: http://dlc.hypotheses.org/195; accessed December 2014.
Hinton, Leanne (2011). Language revitalization and language pedagogy: New teaching and learning strategies. Language and Education. Special Issue: ‘Applied linguist needed’: Cross-disciplinary networking for revitalization and education in endangered language contexts 25:307–18.
Inafuku, Seiki (ed.) (1992). Igaku Okinawago Jiten [A medical dictionary of Okinawan]. Ginowan: Roman Shobō Honten.
India, Office of the Registrar General & Census Comissioner (2001). Census of India. New Delhi: Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs.
Krauss, Michael (2007). Classification and terminology for degrees of language endangerment. In Brenzinger, Matthias (ed.), Language Diversity Endangered, 18. Berlin Mouton de Gruyter.
Lehmann, Christian (1999). Documentation of endangered languages: A priority task for linguistics. ASSIDUE 1: Arbeitspapiere des Seminars fur Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Erfurt, 115. Erfurt: Universität Erfurt.
Lewis, M. Paul, & Simons, Gary F. (2010). Assessing endangerment: Expanding Fishman's GIDS. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 55(2):103–20.
Lewis, M. Paul; Simons, Gary F.; & Fennig, Charles D. (eds.) (2013). Ethnologue: Languages of the world. 17th edn.Dallas, TX: SIL International. Online: http://www.ethnologue.com.
Maffi, Luisa (2005). Linguistic, cultural, and biological diversity. Annual Review of Anthropology 34(1):599617.
Moseley, Christopher (ed.) (2010). Atlas of the world's languages in danger. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. Online: http://www.unesco.org/culture/languages-atlas/en/atlasmap.html.
Read, Zachary (2011). Number of speakers of Central Okinawan: A guide to Okinawan, JLect. Online: http://www.jlect.com/downloads/Number-of-Central-Okinawan-Speakers.pdf.
Shashi, Shyam Singh (1994). Encyclopedia of Indian tribes. New Delhi: Anmol.
Singh, N. Iqbal (1978). The Andaman story. New Delhi: Vikas.
Sutherland, William J. (2003). Parallel extinction risk and global distribution of languages and species. Nature 423:276–79.
Tsunoda, Tasaku (2005). Language endangerment and language revitalization: An introduction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Tyron, Darrell (2007). The languages of the Pacific region: The Austronesian languages of Oceania. In Brenzinger, Matthias (ed.), Language diversity endangered, 391409. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
UNESCO ad hoc expert group on endangered languages (Matthias Brenzinger, Arienne M. Dwyer, Tjeerd de Graaf, Collette Grinevald, Michael Krauss, Osahito Miyaoka, Nicholas Ostler, Osamu Sakiyama, María E. Villalón, Akira Y. Yamamoto, Ofelia Zapeda) (2003). Language vitality and endangerment. Document submitted to the International Expert Meeting on UNESCO Programme Safeguarding of Endangered Languages, Paris, 10–12 March 2003. Online: http://www.unesco.org/culture/ich/doc/src/00120-EN.pdf.
Weninger, Stefan (2004). Ge'ez (Classical Ethiopic). Munich: LINCOM Europa.
Wurm, Stephen A. (2007). Australia and the Pacific. In Moseley, Christopher (ed.), Encyclopedia of the world's endangered languages, 424557. London: Routledge.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Language in Society
  • ISSN: 0047-4045
  • EISSN: 1469-8013
  • URL: /core/journals/language-in-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed