Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-6c7dr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-22T04:32:28.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Being interrupted

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2009

Jack Bilmes
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822, bilmes@hawaii.edu

Abstract

The first section of this article argues for an approach to interruption as a participant's, not an analyst's, phenomenon. For analysts, interruption is best treated as a topic, not a resource. The second section examines how participants go about making interruptions OBSERVABLE events in the flow of interaction - in particular, the ways in which they claim violations of speaking rights. The third section considers some of the ways in which such claims are responded to. In the final section, it is suggested that there is a general need for a more systematic approach to the methods through which acts are constituted in terms of the responses they receive. (Interruption, conversation analysis, interaction)

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable