Aijmer, Karin (2002). English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Allan, Keith (2006). Clause-type, primary illocution, and mood-like operators in English. Language Sciences 28:1–5.
Allen, Harold B. (1959). Canadian American speech differences along the middle border. Journal of the Canadian Linguistic Association 5:17–24.
Andersen, Gisle (2001). Pragmatic markers and sociolinguistic variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Avis, Walter S. (1972). So eh? is Canadian, eh? Canadian Journal of Linguistics 17:89–104.
Bartels, Christine (1997). Towards a compositional interpretation of English statement and question intonation. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts dissertation.
Burton, Strang, & Matthewson, Lisa (2015). Targeted construction storyboards in semantic fieldwork. In Bochnak, M. Ryan & Matthewson, Lisa (eds.), Methodologies in semantic fieldwork, 135–56. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cheshire, Jenny (2007). Discourse variation, grammaticalisation and stuff like that. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11:155–93.
Cheshire, Jenny (2016). Epilogue: The future of discourse-pragmatic variation and change research. In Pichler, Heike (ed.), Discourse-pragmatic variation and change in English, 252–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Columbus, Georgie (2010). A comparative analysis of invariant tags in three varieties of English. English World-Wide 31:288–310.
Cooper, Robin, & Ranta, Aarne (2008). Natural languages as collections of resources. In Cooper, Robin & Kempson, Ruth (eds.), Language in flux: Relating dialogue coordination to language variation, change and evolution, 109–20. London: College Publications.
D'Arcy, Alexandra (2005). Like: Syntax and development. Toronto: University of Toronto dissertation.
D'Arcy, Alexandra (2017). Discourse-pragmatic variation in context: Eight hundred years of like. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Denis, Derek (2015). The development of pragmatic markers in Canadian English. Toronto: University of Toronto dissertation.
Denis, Derek, & Tagliamonte, Sali A. (2016). Innovation, right? Change, you know? Utterance final tags in Canadian English. In Pichler, Heike (ed.), Discourse-pragmatic variation and change in English: New methods and insights, 86–112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dines, Elizabeth (1980). Variation in discourse ‘and stuff like that’. Language in Society 9:13–31.
Dollinger, Stefan (chief editor), & Fee, Margery (associate editor) (2017). Hoser. DCHP-2: The dictionary of Canadianisms on historical principles. 2nd edn. Online: www.dchp.ca/dchp2.
Eckert, Penelope (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12:453–76.
Gibson, Deborah J. (1977). Eight types of ‘eh’. Sociolinguistics Newsletter 8:30–31.
Ginzburg, Jonathan (2012). The interactive stance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gold, Elaine (2008). Canadian eh? From eh to zed. Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies 19:141–56.
Gold, Elaine, & Tremblay, Mireille (2006). Eh? and hein?: Discourse particles or national icons? Canadian Journal of Linguistics 51:247–63.
Grice, Paul (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, Peter & Morgan, Jerry L. (eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
Gunlogson, Christine (2003). True to form: Rising and falling declaratives as questions in English. New York: Routledge.
Guy, Gregory, & Vonwiller, Julia (1984). The meaning of an intonation in Australian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 4(1):1–17.
Heim, Johannes; Keupdjio, Hermann; Lam, Zoe Wai-Man; Osa-Gómez, Adriana; Thoma;, Sonja & Wiltschko, Martina (2016). Intonation and particles as speech act modifiers: A syntactic analysis. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 37:109–29.
Holmes, Janet (1983). The functions of tag questions. English Language Research Journal 3:40–65.
Holmes, Janet (1995). Women, men and politeness. New York: Longman.
Johnson, Marion (1976). Canadian Eh. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 21:153–60.
Labov, William (1966). The linguistic variable as a structural unit. Washington Linguistic Review 3:4–22.
Labov, William (1969). Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45:715–62.
Labov, William (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Labov, William (1978). Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop? Language in Society 7:171–82.
Labov, William (2006). The social stratification of English in New York City. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lavandera, Beatriz R. (1978). Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop? Language in Society 7:171–83.
Love, Tracey (1973). An examination of EH as question particle. Edmonton: University of Alberta B.A. thesis.
Pichler, Heike (2010). Methods in discourse variation analysis: Reflections on the way forward. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14:581–608.
Pichler, Heike (2013). The structure of discourse-pragmatic variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pierrehumbert, Janet, & Hirschberg, Julia (1990). The meaning of intonational contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Cohen, Philip, Morgan, Jerry, & Pollack, Martha (eds.), Intentions in communication, 271–311. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rickford, John R. (1975). Carrying the new wave into syntax: The case of Black English BÍN. In Fasold, Ralph & Shuy, Roger (eds.), Analyzing variation in language, 162–83. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Roberts, Craige (2018). Speech acts in discourse context. In Fogal, Daniel, Harris, Daniel, & Moss, Matt (eds.), New work on speech acts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, to appear.
Romaine, Suzanne (1984). On the problem of syntactic variation and pragmatic meaning in sociolinguistic theory. Folia Linguistica 18:409–39.
Rosengren, Inger (1992). Zur Grammatik und Pragmatik der Exklamation. In Rosengren, Inger (ed.), Satz und Illokution, vol. 1, 263–306. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Sacks, Harvey; Schegloff, Emanuel A.; & Jefferson, Gail (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50:696–735.
Sankoff, Gillian (1973). Above and beyond phonology in variable rules. In Bailey, Charles-James N. & Shuy, Roger W. (eds.), New ways of analyzing variation in English, 44–62. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Sankoff, David, & Thibault, Pierette (1981). Weak complementarity: Tense and aspect in Montreal French. In Johns, Brenda B. & Strong, David R. (eds.), Syntactic change, 206–216. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Schecter, Sandra (1979). Eh? revisited: Is it or is it not Canadian? The English Quarterly 12:37–45.
Stubbe, Maria, & Holmes, Janet (1995). You know, eh and other ‘exasperating expressions’: An analysis of social and stylistic variation in the use of pragmatic devices in a sample of New Zealand English. Language and Communication 15:63–88.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. (2003–2006). Linguistic changes in Canada entering the 21st century. Research Grant. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC). #410-2003-0005.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. (2006). ‘So cool, right?’: Canadian English entering the 21st century. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 51:309–31.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. (2012). Variationist sociolinguistics: Change, observation, interpretation. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Tagliamonte, Sali A., & Denis, Derek (2010). The stuff of change: General extenders in Toronto, Canada. Journal of English Linguistics 38:335–68.
Tottie, Gunnel, & Hoffmann, Sebastian (2006). Question tags in British and American English. Journal of English Linguistics 34(4):283–311.
Trinh, Tue, & Crnič, Luka (2011). On the rise and fall of declaratives. In Reich, Ingo, Horch, Eva, & Pauly, Dennis (eds.), Sinn und Bedeutung 15: Proceedings of the 2010 Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft fuer Semantik, 645–60. Saarbrücken: Saarland University Press.
Tyler, Joseph C. (2015). Expanding and mapping the indexical field: Rising pitch, the uptalk stereotype, and perceptual variation. Journal of English Linguistics 43(4):284–310.
Waters, Cathleen (2016). Practical strategies for elucidating discourse-pragmatic variation. In Heike Pichler (ed.), Discourse-pragmatic variation and change in English: New methods and insight, 21–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wiltschko, Martina (2014). The universal structure of categories: Toward a formal typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wiltschko, Martina, & Heim, Johannes (2016). The syntax of confirmationals: A neo-performative analysis. In Kaltenböck, Gunther, Keizer, Evelien, & Lohmann, Arne (eds.), Outside the clause: Form and function of extra-clausal constituent, 303–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.