Androutsopolous Jannis (ed.) (2014). Mediatization and sociolinguistic change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Baron Naomi S. (1998). Letters by phone or speech by other means: The linguistics of email. Language and Communication 18:133–79.
Baron Naomi S. (2003). Language of the internet. In Farghali Ali (ed.), The Stanford handbook for language engineers, 1–63. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Baron Naomi S. (2004). See you online: Gender issues in college student use of instant messaging. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 23:397–423.
Baron Naomi S., & Ling Rich (2003). IM and SMS: A linguistic comparison. Fourth International Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers, Toronto, October 16–19.
Biber Douglas, & Finnegan Edward (1994). Sociolinguistic perspectives on register. New York: Oxford University Press.
Crystal David (2006). Language and the internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Danchev Andrei, & Kytö Merja (1994). The construction be going to + infinitive in Early Modern English. In Kastovsky Dieter (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English, 59–77. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Davies Diane (2005). Varieties of Modern English: An introduction. Harlow: Pearson Longman.
Dixon R. M. W. (1977). Where have all the adjectives gone? Studies in Language 1:19–80.
Dobson Roger (2003). Text messaging is spoiling teenagers’ sleep. British Medical Journal 327:582.
Eckert Penelope (1988). Adolescent social structure and the spread of linguistic change. Language in Society 17:183–207.
Ferguson Charles A. (1994). Dialect, register, and genre: Working assumptions about conventionalization. In Biber & Finegan, 15–30.
Ferrara Kathleen; Brunner Hans; & Whittemore Greg (1991). Interactive written discouse as an emergent grammar. Written Communication 8:8–34.
Girard Daniel (2006). Nvm about the lolls; Instant messaging could actually be strengthening teenagers’ English. The Toronto Star Toronto, Canada.
Herring Susan C. (2003). Gender and power in on-line communication. In Holmes Janet & Meyerhoff Miriam (eds.), The handbook of language and gender, 202–28. Malden: Blackwell.
Herring Susan C. (2004). Slouching toward the ordinary: Current trends in computer-mediated communication. New Media and Society 6:26–36.
Hinrichs Lars (2010). How to spell the vernacular: A multivariate study of Jamaican e-mails and blogs. In Jaffe Alexandra & Sebba Mark (eds.), Orthography as social action: Scripts, spelling, identity, and power, 325–28. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ito Rika, & Tagliamonte Sali A. (2003). Well weird, right dodgy, very strange, really cool: Layering and recycling in English intensifiers. Language in Society 32:257–79.
Jones Graham M., & Schieffelin Bambi B. (2009). Enquoting voices, accomplishing talk: Uses of be + like in instant messaging. Language and Communication 29:77–113.
Kiesler Sara; Siegel Jane; & McGuire Timothy W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist 39:1123–34.
Labov William (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Ling Rich (2005). The sociolinguistics of SMS: An analysis of SMS use by a random sample of Norwegians. In Ling Rich & Pedersen Per E. (eds.), Mobile communications: Re-negotiation of the social sphere, 335–49. London: Springer.
Nesselhauf Nadja (2006). The decline of be to and the rise of be going to in Late Modern English: Connection or coincidence? In Houswitschka Christoph, Knappe Gabriele, & Müller Anja (ed.), Anglistentag 2005 Bamberg Proceedings, 515–29. Trier: WVT.
Nesselhauf Nadja (2007a). Diachronic analysis with the internet? Will and shall in ARCHER and in a corpus of e-texts from the web. In Hundt Marianne, Nesselhauf Nadja, & Biewer Carolin (eds.), Corpus linguistics and the web, 287–305. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Nesselhauf Nadja (2007b). The spread of the progressive and its ‘future’ use. English Language and Linguistics 11:193–209.
Partington Alan (1993). Corpus evidence of language change: The case of intensifiers. In Baker Mona, Francis Gill, & Tognini-Bonelli Elena (eds.), Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair, 177–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Poplack Shana, & Tagliamonte Sali A. (1999). The grammaticalization of going to in (African American) English. Language Variation and Change 11:315–42.
Romaine Suzanne (1994). On the creation and expansion of registers: Sports reporting in Tok Pisin. In Biber Douglas (ed.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register, 59–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Segerstad Ylva af Hård (2005). Language in SMS: A socio-linguistic view. In Harper Richard, Palen Leysia, & Taylor Alex (eds.), The inside text: Social, cultural and design perspectives on SMS, 33–51. The Netherlands: Springer.
Stenström Anna-Brita (2000). It's enough funny, man: Intensifiers in teenage talk. In Kirk John (ed.), Corpora galore: Analyses and techniques in describing English. Papers from the Nineteenth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerised Corpora (ICAME 1998), 177–90. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Szmrecsanyi Benedikt (2003). Be going to versus will/shall: Does syntax matter? Journal of English Linguistics 31:295–323.
Tagliamonte Sali A. (2002). Comparative sociolinguistics. In Chambers J. K., Trudgill Peter, & Schilling-Estes Natalie (eds.), Handbook of language variation and change, 729–63. Malden: Blackwell.
Tagliamonte Sali A. (2006). Analysing sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tagliamonte Sali A. (2008). So different and pretty cool! Recycling intensifiers in Canadian English. Special issue of English Language and Linguistics, Intensifiers 12:361–94.
Tagliamonte Sali A., & D'Arcy Alexandra (2009). Peaks beyond phonology: Adolescence, incrementation, and language change. Language 85:58–108.
Tagliamonte Sali A., & Denis Derek (2008). Linguistic ruin? LOL! Instant messaging, teen language and linguistic change. American Speech 83:3–34.
Tagliamonte Sali A.; Durham; Mercedes & Smith Jennifer (2014). Grammaticalization at an early stage: Future be going to in conservative British dialects. English Language and Linguistics 18:75–108.
Tagliamonte Sali A., & Roberts Chris (2005). So cool, so weird, so innovative! The use of intensifiers in the television series Friends. American Speech 80:280–300.
Tagliamonte Sali A., & Uscher Dylan (2009). Queer youth in the speech community: A comparative analysis of variation and change. Presented at NWAV 38 (New Ways of Analyzing Variation), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. October 22–25, 2009.
Thurlow Crispin (2003). Generation txt? Exposing the sociolinguistics of young people's text-messaging. Discourse Analysis Online 1. Online: extra.shu.ac.uk/daol/articles/v1/n1/a3/thurlow2002003.html.
Thurlow Crispin (2006). From statistical panic to moral panic: The metadiscursive construction and poplar exaggeration of new media language in the print media. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 11:667–701.
Torres-Cacoullos Rena, & Walker James A. (2009a). On the persistence of grammar in discourse formulas: A variaionist study of that. Linguistics 47:1–43.
Torres-Cacoullos Rena, & Walker James A. (2009b). The present of the English future: Grammatical variation and collocations in discourse. Language 85:321–54.
Uscher Dylan (2009). Understanding the linguistic centaur: Language variation and change in computer-mediated communication. Toronto: University of Toronto MA forum paper.
Uscher Dylan (2010). Language change or just a phase? A real-time study of intensifiers in teenage blogs. Paper presented at Change and Variation in Canada 4, Memorial University of Newfoundland and Labrador.
van Herk Gerard (2009). That's so tween: Intensifier use in on-line subcultures. Paper presented at NWAV 35, November 9-12, 2006, Columbus, Ohio.
Williams Christopher (2013). Changes in the verb phrase in legislative language in English. In Aarts Bas, Close Joanne, Leech Geoffrey, & Wallis Sean A. (eds.), The verb phrase in English: Investigating recent language change with corpora, 353–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yates Simeon J. (1996). Oral and written linguistic aspects of computer conterencing: A corpus based study. In Herring Susan C. (ed.), Computer-mediated communication, 29–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.