Skip to main content
×
×
Home

So sick or so cool? The language of youth on the internet

  • Sali A. Tagliamonte (a1) and In collaboration with Dylan Uscher, Lawrence Kwok, and students from HUM199Y 2009 and 2010
Abstract

This article presents the results of a two-year study of North American youth which produced a 179,000 word corpus of internet language from the same writers across three registers: email, instant messaging, and phone texting. Analysis of three linguistic phenomena—(i) acronyms, short forms, and initialisms; (ii) intensifiers; and (iii) future temporal reference—reveals that despite variation in form and contrasting frequencies across registers, the patterns of variant use are stable. This offers linguistic evidence that there is no degeneration of grammar in internet language use. Instead, the young people are fluidly navigating a complex set of new written registers, and they command them all. (Internet, language change, youth)*

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      So sick or so cool? The language of youth on the internet
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      So sick or so cool? The language of youth on the internet
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      So sick or so cool? The language of youth on the internet
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Androutsopolous, Jannis (ed.) (2014). Mediatization and sociolinguistic change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Baron, Naomi S. (1998). Letters by phone or speech by other means: The linguistics of email. Language and Communication 18:133–79.
Baron, Naomi S. (2003). Language of the internet. In Farghali, Ali (ed.), The Stanford handbook for language engineers, 163. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Baron, Naomi S. (2004). See you online: Gender issues in college student use of instant messaging. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 23:397423.
Baron, Naomi S., & Ling, Rich (2003). IM and SMS: A linguistic comparison. Fourth International Conference of the Association of Internet Researchers, Toronto, October 16–19.
Biber, Douglas, & Finnegan, Edward (1994). Sociolinguistic perspectives on register. New York: Oxford University Press.
Crystal, David (2006). Language and the internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Danchev, Andrei, & Kytö, Merja (1994). The construction be going to + infinitive in Early Modern English. In Kastovsky, Dieter (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English, 5977. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Davies, Diane (2005). Varieties of Modern English: An introduction. Harlow: Pearson Longman.
Dixon, R. M. W. (1977). Where have all the adjectives gone? Studies in Language 1:1980.
Dobson, Roger (2003). Text messaging is spoiling teenagers’ sleep. British Medical Journal 327:582.
Eckert, Penelope (1988). Adolescent social structure and the spread of linguistic change. Language in Society 17:183207.
Ferguson, Charles A. (1994). Dialect, register, and genre: Working assumptions about conventionalization. In Biber & Finegan, 15–30.
Ferrara, Kathleen; Brunner, Hans; & Whittemore, Greg (1991). Interactive written discouse as an emergent grammar. Written Communication 8:834.
Girard, Daniel (2006). Nvm about the lolls; Instant messaging could actually be strengthening teenagers’ English. The Toronto Star Toronto, Canada.
Herring, Susan C. (2003). Gender and power in on-line communication. In Holmes, Janet & Meyerhoff, Miriam (eds.), The handbook of language and gender, 202–28. Malden: Blackwell.
Herring, Susan C. (2004). Slouching toward the ordinary: Current trends in computer-mediated communication. New Media and Society 6:2636.
Herring, Susan C. (2007). A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Language@internet 4. Online: www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2007/761.
Hinrichs, Lars (2010). How to spell the vernacular: A multivariate study of Jamaican e-mails and blogs. In Jaffe, Alexandra & Sebba, Mark (eds.), Orthography as social action: Scripts, spelling, identity, and power, 325–28. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ito, Rika, & Tagliamonte, Sali A. (2003). Well weird, right dodgy, very strange, really cool: Layering and recycling in English intensifiers. Language in Society 32:257–79.
Jones, Graham M., & Schieffelin, Bambi B. (2009). Enquoting voices, accomplishing talk: Uses of be + like in instant messaging. Language and Communication 29:77113.
Kiesler, Sara; Siegel, Jane; & McGuire, Timothy W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist 39:1123–34.
Labov, William (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Ling, Rich (2005). The sociolinguistics of SMS: An analysis of SMS use by a random sample of Norwegians. In Ling, Rich & Pedersen, Per E. (eds.), Mobile communications: Re-negotiation of the social sphere, 335–49. London: Springer.
Nesselhauf, Nadja (2006). The decline of be to and the rise of be going to in Late Modern English: Connection or coincidence? In Houswitschka, Christoph, Knappe, Gabriele, & Müller, Anja (ed.), Anglistentag 2005 Bamberg Proceedings, 515–29. Trier: WVT.
Nesselhauf, Nadja (2007a). Diachronic analysis with the internet? Will and shall in ARCHER and in a corpus of e-texts from the web. In Hundt, Marianne, Nesselhauf, Nadja, & Biewer, Carolin (eds.), Corpus linguistics and the web, 287305. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Nesselhauf, Nadja (2007b). The spread of the progressive and its ‘future’ use. English Language and Linguistics 11:193209.
Partington, Alan (1993). Corpus evidence of language change: The case of intensifiers. In Baker, Mona, Francis, Gill, & Tognini-Bonelli, Elena (eds.), Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair, 177–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Poplack, Shana, & Tagliamonte, Sali A. (1999). The grammaticalization of going to in (African American) English. Language Variation and Change 11:315–42.
Romaine, Suzanne (1994). On the creation and expansion of registers: Sports reporting in Tok Pisin. In Biber, Douglas (ed.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register, 5981. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Segerstad, Ylva af Hård (2005). Language in SMS: A socio-linguistic view. In Harper, Richard, Palen, Leysia, & Taylor, Alex (eds.), The inside text: Social, cultural and design perspectives on SMS, 3351. The Netherlands: Springer.
Squires, Lauren (2007). Whats the use of apostrophes? Gender difference and linguistic variation in instant messaging. American University TESOL Working Papers 4. Online: http://www1.american.edu/tesol?CMCSquiresFinal.pdf.
Stenström, Anna-Brita (2000). It's enough funny, man: Intensifiers in teenage talk. In Kirk, John (ed.), Corpora galore: Analyses and techniques in describing English. Papers from the Nineteenth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerised Corpora (ICAME 1998), 177–90. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt (2003). Be going to versus will/shall: Does syntax matter? Journal of English Linguistics 31:295323.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. (2002). Comparative sociolinguistics. In Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter, & Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), Handbook of language variation and change, 729–63. Malden: Blackwell.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. (2006). Analysing sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tagliamonte, Sali A. (2008). So different and pretty cool! Recycling intensifiers in Canadian English. Special issue of English Language and Linguistics, Intensifiers 12:361–94.
Tagliamonte, Sali A., & D'Arcy, Alexandra (2009). Peaks beyond phonology: Adolescence, incrementation, and language change. Language 85:58108.
Tagliamonte, Sali A., & Denis, Derek (2008). Linguistic ruin? LOL! Instant messaging, teen language and linguistic change. American Speech 83:334.
Tagliamonte, Sali A.; Durham;, Mercedes & Smith, Jennifer (2014). Grammaticalization at an early stage: Future be going to in conservative British dialects. English Language and Linguistics 18:75108.
Tagliamonte, Sali A., & Roberts, Chris (2005). So cool, so weird, so innovative! The use of intensifiers in the television series Friends. American Speech 80:280300.
Tagliamonte, Sali A., & Uscher, Dylan (2009). Queer youth in the speech community: A comparative analysis of variation and change. Presented at NWAV 38 (New Ways of Analyzing Variation), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. October 22–25, 2009.
Thurlow, Crispin (2003). Generation txt? Exposing the sociolinguistics of young people's text-messaging. Discourse Analysis Online 1. Online: extra.shu.ac.uk/daol/articles/v1/n1/a3/thurlow2002003.html.
Thurlow, Crispin (2006). From statistical panic to moral panic: The metadiscursive construction and poplar exaggeration of new media language in the print media. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 11:667701.
Torres-Cacoullos, Rena, & Walker, James A. (2009a). On the persistence of grammar in discourse formulas: A variaionist study of that. Linguistics 47:143.
Torres-Cacoullos, Rena, & Walker, James A. (2009b). The present of the English future: Grammatical variation and collocations in discourse. Language 85:321–54.
Uscher, Dylan (2009). Understanding the linguistic centaur: Language variation and change in computer-mediated communication. Toronto: University of Toronto MA forum paper.
Uscher, Dylan (2010). Language change or just a phase? A real-time study of intensifiers in teenage blogs. Paper presented at Change and Variation in Canada 4, Memorial University of Newfoundland and Labrador.
van Herk, Gerard (2009). That's so tween: Intensifier use in on-line subcultures. Paper presented at NWAV 35, November 9-12, 2006, Columbus, Ohio.
Williams, Christopher (2013). Changes in the verb phrase in legislative language in English. In Aarts, Bas, Close, Joanne, Leech, Geoffrey, & Wallis, Sean A. (eds.), The verb phrase in English: Investigating recent language change with corpora, 353–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yates, Simeon J. (1996). Oral and written linguistic aspects of computer conterencing: A corpus based study. In Herring, Susan C. (ed.), Computer-mediated communication, 2946. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Language in Society
  • ISSN: 0047-4045
  • EISSN: 1469-8013
  • URL: /core/journals/language-in-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 323
Total number of PDF views: 1476 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 2695 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st April 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.