Algeo, John (1988). The tag question in British English: It's different, isn't it? English World Wide 9:171–91.
Beach, Wayne A. (1993). Transitional regularities for ‘casual’ “okay” usages. Journal of Pragmatics 19:325–52.
Boulima, Jamila (1999). Negotiated interaction in target language classroom discourse. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bucholtz, Mary (1996). Black feminist theory and African American women's linguistic practice. In Bergvall, Victoria L.Bing, Janet M. & Freed, Alice F. (eds.), Rethinking language and gender research: Theory and practice, 267–90. London: Longman.
Calnan, A. C. T., & Davidson, Marilyn J. (1998). The impact of gender and its interaction with role and status on the use of tag questions in meetings. Women in Management Review 13:19–36.
Cameron, Deborah (1995). Rethinking language and gender studies: Some issues for the 1990s. In Mills, Sara (ed.), Language and gender: Interdisciplinary perspectives, 31–44. London: Longman.
Cameron, Deborah; McAlinden, Fiona; & O'Leary, Kathy (1988). Lakoff in context: The social and linguistic functions of tag questions. In Coates, Jennifer & Cameron, Deborah (eds.), Women and their speech communities: New perspectives on language and sex, 74–93. London: Longman.
Coates, Jennifer (1993). Women, men and language. London: Longman.
Dines, Elizabeth R. (1980). Variation in discourse – “and stuff like that.” Language in Society 9:13–31.
Dubois, Betty L., & Crouch, Isabel M. (1975). The question of tag questions in women's speech: They don't really use more of them, do they? Language in Society 4:289–94.
Eckert, Penelope (2000). Linguistic variation as social practice: The linguistic construction of identity in Belten High. Oxford: Blackwell.
Eckert, Penelope (2005). Variation, convention, and social meaning. Plenary talk at meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Francisco.
Eggins, Suzanne, & Slade, Diana (1997). Analysing casual conversation. London: Cassell.
Erman, Britt (1987). Pragmatic expressions in English: A study of you know, you see, and I mean in face-to-face conversation. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Erman, Britt (1992). Female and male usage of pragmatic expressions in same-sex and mixed-sex interaction. Language Variation and Change 4:217–34.
Fishman, Pamela M. (1978). Interaction: The work women do. Social Problems 25:397–406.
Gass, Susan M., & Varonis, Evangeline Marlos (1986). Sex differences in NNS/NNS interactions. In Day, Richard R. (ed.), Talking to learn: Conversations in second language acquisition, 327–51. Rowley: Newbury House.
Goffman, Erving (1981). The lecture. In Goffman, Erving (ed.), Forms of talk, 162–96. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Grässel, Ulrike (1991). Sprachverhalten und Geschlecht: Eine empirische Studie zu geschlechtsspezifischem Sprachverhalten in Fernsehdiskussionen. Pfaffenweiler, Germany: Centaurus.
Greenwood, Alice, & Freed, Alice F. (1992). Women talking to women: The function of questions in conversation. In Hall, KiraBucholtz, Mary & Moonwomon, Birch (eds.), Locating power: Proceedings of the second Berkeley Women and Language Conference, 197–206. Berkeley, CA: BWLG.
Heisler, Troy (1996). OK – a dynamic discourse marker in Montréal French. In Arnold, Jennifer (ed.), Sociolinguistic variation: Data, theory and analysis, 293–312. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Henley, Nancy (1995). Ethnicity and gender issues in language. In Landrine, Hope (ed.), Bringing cultural diversity to feminist psychology, 361–96. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Heritage, John (1988). Current developments in conversation analysis. In Roger, Derek & Bull, Peter (eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary approach, 21–47. Clevedon & Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
Holmes, Janet (1982). The functions of tag questions. English Language Research Journal 3:40–65.
Holmes, Janet (1984). Hedging your bets and sitting on the fence: Some evidence for hedges as support structures. Te Reo 27:47–62.
Holmes, Janet (1986). Functions of you know in women's and men's speech. Language in Society 15:1–21.
Holmes, Janet (1998). Women's talk: The question of sociolinguistic universals. In Coates, Jennifer (ed.), Language and gender: A reader, 461–83. Oxford: Blackwell.
Holmes, Janet, & Marra, Meredith (2004). Relational practice in the workplace: women's talk or gendered discourse? Language in Society 33:377–98.
Holmes, Janet, & Schnurr, Stephanie (2006). ‘Doing femininity’ at work: More than just relational practice. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10:31–51.
Holmes, Janet, & Stubbe, Maria (1997). Good listeners: Gender differences in New Zealand conversation. Women and Language 20:7–14.
Lakoff, Robin (1975). Language and women's place. New York: Harper & Row.
Lavandera, Beatriz R. (1978). Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop? Language in Society 7:171–82.
Levin, Harry, & Gray, Deborah (1983). The lecturer's OK. American Speech 58:195–200.
McCarthy, Michael (1991). Discourse analysis for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCarthy, Michael (2002). Good listenership made plain. British and American non-minimal response tokens in everyday conversation. In Reppen, RandiFitzmaurice, Susan M. & Biber, Douglas (eds.), Using corpora to explore linguistic variation, 49–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mehan, Hugh (1979). “What time is it, Denise?”: Asking known information questions in classroom discourse. Theory Into Practice 18:285–94.
Meyerhoff, Miriam (1996). Dealing with gender identity as a sociolinguistic variable. In Bergvall, Victoria L.Bing, Janet M. & Freed, Alice F. (eds.), Rethinking language and gender research: Theory and practice, 202–27. London: Longman.
Milroy, Lesley (1987). Observing and analyzing natural language. Oxford: Blackwell.
O'Barr, William M., & Atkins, Bowman K. (1980). Women's language or powerless language. In McConnell-Ginet, Sally et al. (eds.), Women and language in literature and society, 98–110. New York: Praeger.
Ochs, Elinor (1992). Indexing gender. In Duranti, Alessandro & Goodwin, Charles (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, 335–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Östman, Jan-Ola (1981). “You know”: A discourse-functional approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Poos, Deanna, & Simpson, Rita (2002). Cross-disciplinary comparisons of hedging: Some findings from the Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. In Reppen, RandiFitzmaurice, Susan M. & Biber, Douglas (eds.), Using corpora to explore linguistic variation, 3–23. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Romaine, Suzanne, & Lange, Deborah (1991). The use of like as a marker of reported speech and thought: A case of grammaticalization in progress. American Speech 66:240–77.
Rosenblum, Karen E. (1986). Revelatory or purposive? Making sense of a female register. Semiotica 59:157–70.
Schachter, Stanley; Christenfeld, Nicholas; Ravina, Bernard; & Bilous, Frances (1991). Speech disfluency and the structure of knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60:362–67.
Simpson, Rita C.; Briggs, Sarah L.; Ovens, Janine; & Swales, John M. (2000). The Michigan Corpus of Academic Spoken English. Ann Arbor, MI: Regents of the University of Michigan.
Sinclair, John, & Coulthard, Malcolm (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stubbs, Michael (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. Oxford: Blackwell.
Swacker, Marjorie (1975). The sex of the speaker as a sociolinguistic variable. In Thorne, Barrie & Henley, Nancy (eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance, 76–83. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Swann, Joan (2002). ‘Yes, but is it gender?’ In Litosseliti, Lia & Sunderland, Jane (eds.), Gender identity and discourse analysis, 43–67. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Tannen, Deborah (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: William Morrow.
Tannen, Deborah (1994). Gender and discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tannen, Deborah (2002). Agonism in academic discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 34:1651–69.
Tottie, Gunnel (1991). Conversational style in British and American English: The case of backchannels. In Aijmer, Karin & Altenberg, Bengt (eds.), English corpus linguistics, 254–71. London: Longman.
Zimmermann, Don H., & West, Candace (1975). Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In Thorne, Barry & Henley, Nancy (eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance, 105–29. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.