Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

How children start arguments*

  • Douglas W. Maynard (a1)
Abstract
ABSTRACT

Previous research on children's arguments has neglected their initial phases, particularly how they arise out of children's ongoing practical activities. This paper examines how any utterance or activity can be opposed, the concept of opposition being at the center of any definition of argument. However, once opposition has occurred, it can be treated in a variety of ways, and a full-blown argument or dispute is only one possible and contingent outcome. Children analyze others's moves not only verbally, but nonverbally as well. Thus, bodily actions and presupposition are necessary components in the analysis of how arguments are started. Nonverbal oppositional moves may be at the base of semantically constructed disputes. When opposition occurs, it is to be taken to imply the violation of some rule or value. The meaning of that rule or value relative to children's culture is taken to have to do not with its content, but its usage in promoting a local social organization. (Conversational analysis, child language, social organization, presupposition, dispute genres, American English [middle class, Caucasian])

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

A. Eisenberg , & C. Garvey (1981). Children's use of verbal strategies in resolving conflicts. Discourse Processes 4: 149–70.

G. A. Fine (1979). Small groups and culture creation. American Sociological Review 44(5):733–45.

J. Fitzgerald , & R. Dickins (1981). Disputing in legal and nonlegal contexts: Some questions for sociologists of law. Law and Society Review. 15(3/4):681706.

M. H. Goodwin (1980). He-said-she-said: Formal cultural procedures for the construction of a gossip dispute activity. American Ethnologist 7(4):674–95.

M. H. Goodwin (1982a). Processes of dispute management among urban Black children. American Ethnologist 9(1 ):7696.

M. H. Goodwin ( 1982b). “Instigating” Storytelling as social process. American Ethnologist 9(4):799–89.

A. Grimshaw (1980). Mishearings, misunderstandings, and other non-successes in talk: A plea for redress of speaker oriented bias. Sociological Inquiry 50 (3/4):3174.

R. A. Hilbert (1981). Toward an improved understanding of “role” Theory and Society 10 (2):207–26.

D. W. Maynard (1982). Person-descriptions in plea bargaining. Semiotica 42(2/4):, 95213.

A. Pomerantz (1980). Telling my side: ‘Limited access’ as a ‘fishing’ device. Sociological Inquiry 50(314): 186–98.

H. Sacks , E. A. Schegloff , & G. Jefferson (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50:696735.

E. A. Schegloff & H. Sacks (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica 8:289327.

R. Stalnaker (1973). Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2:447–57.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Language in Society
  • ISSN: 0047-4045
  • EISSN: 1469-8013
  • URL: /core/journals/language-in-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 9 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 110 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.