Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T00:08:37.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Joy Kreeft Peyton, Peg Griffin, Walt Wolfram, & Ralph Fasold (eds.), Language in action: New studies of language in society: Essays in honor of Roger W. Shuy. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2000. Pp. xv, 608. Hb $120.00, Pb $37.50.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2004

Chaoqun Xie
Affiliation:
Foreign Languages Institute, Fujian Teachers University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350007, China, chaoqunxie@yahoo.com.cn
Bingyun Li
Affiliation:
Foreign Languages Institute, Fujian Teachers University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350007, China, li_bingyun@yahoo.com.cn

Extract

Many scholars and researchers doing sociolinguistics will agree that “Every language is a social product, and every society constitutes itself through language” (Coulmas 2001:563). In other words, many sociolinguists share the conviction that language should be accounted for in its social context for the simple reason that we live in reality instead of virtually. And Roger W. Shuy has set us an excellent example. Throughout his whole life, Shuy, “a living monument to the power of language in everyday life” (p. x), has attached great importance to investigating language issues in real-life encounters, insightfully claiming “that possibilities for linguistic research are everywhere, as language is used wherever we turn” (2). What is more important and more admirable is that Shuy has shown that sociolinguists can and should contribute to advancing social progress in various areas through their own research work. In other words, sociolinguistic researchers should have a social commitment to use their “linguistic ‘tool bag’ (his well-known term) to shed some light on real-world problems” (577). This finds expression in the volume under review, in which many chapters are contributed by his former students. The diversity of the topics covered provides insight into how language and various aspects of social life are closely linked together. This book should be of much interest and great value to those interested in language in society.

Type
BOOK REVIEW
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, & Snow, Catherine E. (eds.) (2002). Talking to adults: The contribution of multiparty discourse to language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bruthiaux, Paul (2002). Predicting challenges to English as a global language in the 21st century. Language Problems and Language Planning 26:12957.Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian (2001). Sociolinguistics. In Mark Aronoff & Janie Rees-Miller (eds.), The handbook of linguistics, 56381. Oxford: Blackwell.
Escandell-Vidal, Victoria (1996). Toward a cognitive approach to politeness. Language Sciences 18: 62950.Google Scholar
Eelen, Gino (2001). A critique of politeness studies. Manchester: St. Jerome.
Sifianou, Maria (2001). Discourse analysis: An introduction. Athens: Leader.
Trudgill, Peter (2002). Sociolinguistic variation and change. Washington: Georgetown University Press.