Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T14:04:09.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Li Yuming & Li Wei (eds.), The language situation in China: Volume 6. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton and Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2021. Pp. 462. Hb. €130.

Review products

Li Yuming & Li Wei (eds.), The language situation in China: Volume 6. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton and Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2021. Pp. 462. Hb. €130.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2021

Xiaolu Zhong*
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Zhejiang University 866 Yuhangtang Rd, Hangzhou, 310058, Chinazhongxiaolu@zju.edu.cn

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ball, Martin J. (ed.) (2010). The Routledge handbook of sociolinguistics around the world. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crystal, David (2000). Language death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, Xi, & Xiaohong, Zhu (2016). Theories and practices of language life in China. Chinese Journal of Language Policy and Planning 1(3):2433.Google Scholar
Li, Yuming (2016). Language life and study of language life. Chinese Journal of Language Policy and Planning 1(3):1523.Google Scholar
Liu, Haitao (2006). Language planning and language policy: Viewing disciplinary development from the change of definition. In Zhangtai, Chen (ed.), Theory and practice of language planning, 5560. Beijing: Language & Culture Press.Google Scholar
Zhao, Shouhui, & Shang, Guowen (2016). Language planning agency in China: From the perspective of the language academies. Current Issues in Language Planning 17(1):2335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar