Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Penguins don't care, but women do: A social identity analysis of a Whorfian problem*

  • Fatemeh Khosroshahi (a1)
Abstract

The Sapir–Whorf hypothesis is often implicitly assumed to be true independent of its empirical status. Feminist attempts to eliminate the generic he must assume that language somehow affects thought, since there is no intrinsic harm in the word itself. Research to date has, in fact, shown that generic he tends to suggest a male referent in the mind of the reader. This study asks whether people's interpretation of a generic sentence varies depending on whether or not they have followed feminist proposals and reformed their own language. Fifty-five college students read sex-indefinite paragraphs involving either the generic he, he or she, or they, and made drawings to represent the mental images evoked by what they read. The sex of the figure drawn was the dependent variable. Students' term papers were used to determine whether their own language was “reformed” or “traditional.” He was found to be least likely to evoke female referents, he or she most likely, and they in between. However, regardless of the pronoun, men drew more male and fewer female pictures than women. Moreover, whereas men did not differ in their imagery, whether their language was reformed or traditional, women did. Traditional-language women had more male images than female. Reformed-language women showed the opposite. Results are discussed in terms of the theory of social identity (Tajfel 1981), and it is concluded that the weak, correlational form of Whorf's thesis applies to women, the group that initiated the reform in the first place. (Gender and language, pronouns, social psychology of language, Sapir–Whorf hypothesis)

Copyright
References
Hide All
Baddeley, A. D. (1976). The psychology of memory. New York: Basic.
Baron, D. (1986). Grammar and gender. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Bertilson, H. S., Springer, D. K., & Fierke, K. M. (1982). Underrepresentation of female referents as pronouns, examples, and pictures in introductory college textbooks. Psychological Reports 51:923–31.
Bodine, A. (1975). Androcentrism in prescriptive grammar: Singular “they,” sex-indefinite “he,” and “he or she.” Language in Society 4:129–46.
Bourhis, R. Y. (1982). Language policies and language attitudes: Le monde de la francophonie. In Ryan, E. B. & Giles, H. (eds.), Attitudes towards language variation. London: Edward Arnold. 3462.
Bourhis, R. Y., & Giles, H. (1977). The language of intergroup distinctiveness. In Giles, H. (ed.), Language, ethnicity, and intergroup relations. London: Academic. 117–35.
Brown, R. (1958). Words and things. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.
Brown, R. (1965). Social psychology. New York: Free Press.
Brown, R. (1976). Reference: In memorial tribute to Eric Lenneberg. Cognition 4:125–53.
Brown, R. (1986). Social psychology. The second edition. New York: Free Press.
Brown, R., & Oilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Sebeok, T. A. (ed.), Style in language. Cambridge, Mass.: Technology Press. 253–76.
Cameron, D. (1985). What has gender got to do with sex? Language and Communication 5:1927.
Carroll, J. B., & Casagrande, J. B. (1958). The function of language classifications in behavior. In Maccoby, E. E., Newcomb, T. M., & Hartley, E. L. (eds.), Readings in social psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 1831.
Clark, H. H., & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Clark, K. B., & Clark, M. P. (1947). Racial identification and preference in Negro children. In Newcomb, T. M. & Hartley, E. L. (eds.), Readings in social psychology. New York: Holt. 169–78.
Crawford, M., & English, L. (1984). Generic versus specific inclusion of women in language: Effects on recall. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 13:373–81.
Dubois, B. L., & Crouch, I. M. (1978). Introduction. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 17:515.
Edelsky, C. (1979). Question intonation and sex roles. Language in Society 8:1532.
Frederiksen, C. H., & Dominic, J. F. (eds.) (1981). Writing: The nature, development, and teaching of written communication (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
Giles, H. (ed.) (1977). Language, ethnicity, and intergroup relations. London: Academic.
Giles, H., Bourhis, R. Y., & Taylor, D. M. (1977). Towards a theory of language in ethnic group relations. In Giles, H. (ed.), Language, ethnicity, and intergroup relations. London: Academic. 307–48.
Graham, A. (1975). The making of a nonsexist dictionary. In Thome, B. & N, Henley (eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House. 5763.
Henley, N. M. (1977). Body politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
Holmes, J. (1986). Functions of you know in women's and men's speech. Language in Society 15:122.
Hraba, J., & Grant, G. (1970). Black is beautiful: A reexamination of racial preference and identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 16:398402.
Jenkins, A. (1985). Hearts and minds: The relationship between racial attitudes and self-esteem in young children. Unpublished honors thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.
Kay, P., & Kempton, W. (1984). What is the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis? American Anthropologist 86:6579.
Kelman, H. C. (1974). Social influence and linkages between the individual and the social system. In Tedeschi, J. T. (ed.), Perspectives on social power. Chicago: Aldine. 125–71.
Kelman, H. C. (1980). The role of action in attitude change. In Howe, H. E. Jr., & Page, M. M. (eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Beliefs, attitudes, and values, 1979. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. 117–94.
Kilpatrick, J. J. (1976). And some are more equal than others. American Sociologist 11:8593.
Kramarae, C. (1981). Women and men speaking. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.
Kramarae, C. (1982). Gender: How she speaks. In Ryan, E. B. & Giles, H. (eds.), Attitudes towards language variation. London: Edward Arnold. 8498.
Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman's place. Language in Society 2:4580.
Lambert, W. E. (1967). A social psychology of bilingualism. Journal of Social Issues 23:91109.
Lang, P. J. (1984). Cognition in emotion: Concept and action. In Izard, C. E., Kagan, J., & Zajonc, R. B. (eds.), Emotions, cognition, and behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 192226.
Langer, E. (1983). The psychology of control. Beverly Hills: Sage.
MacKay, D. G. (1980). Psychology, prescriptive grammar, and the pronoun problem. American Psychologist 35:444–49.
MacKay, D. G. (1983). A reply to Pateman on singular they. Language in Society 12:7576.
MacKay, D. G., & Fulkerson, D. C. (1979). On the comprehension and production of pronouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18:661–73.
Martyna, W. (1980a). Beyond the “he/man” approach: The case for nonsexist language. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 5:482–93.
Martyna, W. (1980b). The psychology of the generic masculine. In McConnell-Ginet, S., Borker, R., & Furman, N. (eds.), Women and language in literature and society. New York: Praeger. 6978.
Maurice, S. (1985). Evaluative reactions to spoken languages: Attitudes of French Canadians. McGill Student Journal of Psychology 1:8497.
McConnell-Ginet, S. (1984). The origins of sexist language in discourse. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 433:123–35.
McGuire, W. J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2). New York: Random House. 233346.
Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology 90:227–34.
Miller, C., & Swift, K. (1976). Words and women. New York: Anchor.
Moscovici, S. (1985). Social influence and conformity. In Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2). New York: Random House. 347412.
Moulton, J., Robinson, G. M., & Elias, C. (1978). Psychology in action: Sex bias in language use: “Neutral” pronouns that aren't. American Psychologist 33:1032–36.
Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In Solso, R. L. (ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum. 5585.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1984). Essentials of behavioral research. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ryan, E. B., & Giles, H. (eds.) (1982). Attitudes towards language variation. London: Edward Arnold.
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
Schneider, J. W., & Hacker, S. L. (1973). Sex role imagery and use of the generic “man” in introductory texts: A case in the sociology of sociology. American Sociologist 8:1218.
Silveira, J. (1980). Generic masculine words and thinking. Women's Studies International Quarterly 3:165–78.
Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Smith, P. M. (1985). Language, the sexes, and society. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Stephan, W. G. (1985). Intergroup relations. In Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2). New York: Random House. 599658.
Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18:645–59.
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, D. M., Bassili, J. N., & Aboud, F. E. (1973). Dimensions of ethnic identity: An example from Quebec. Journal of Social Psychology 89:185–92.
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality. Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (ed. by Carroll, J. B.). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Williams, J., & Giles, H. (1978). The changing status of women in society: An intergroup perspective. In Tajfel, H. (ed.), Differentiation between social groups. London: Academic. 431–46.
Winer, B. J. (1962). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Wolfson, N., & Manes, J. (1980). “Don't ‘dear’ me!” In McConnell-Ginet, S., Borker, R., & Furman, N. (eds.), Women and language in literature and society. New York: Praeger. 7992.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Language in Society
  • ISSN: 0047-4045
  • EISSN: 1469-8013
  • URL: /core/journals/language-in-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed