Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T12:39:13.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Positioning the interviewer: Strategic uses of embedded orientation in interview narratives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Gabriella Modan  and
Amy Shuman
Gabriella Modan
Affiliation:
Department of English, The Ohio State University, 421 Denney Hall, 164 West 17th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210-1370, USAmodan.1@osu.edu
Amy Shuman
Affiliation:
Department of English, The Ohio State University, 421 Denney Hall, 164 West 17th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210-1370, USAshuman.1@osu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The structure and function of a sociolinguistic interview sets up a context that affords informants the opportunity to achieve their own goals. We examine how an informant manipulates the reception format of the speech event, using embedded orientation to characterize information as alternately given or new, and the interviewer consequently as an insider or outsider. Whereas previous analyses have examined how embedded orientation highlights or sheds light on information in complicating action clauses, we posit that the content of embedded orientation clauses is important in and of itself. Rather than serving as simply background information, embedded orientation can do important ideological work. In the case here, embedded orientation introduces into the narrative traces of a local story—the history of local Fascism, a topic that is rarely discussed in the teller's community. (Embedded orientation, narrative, sociolinguistic interview)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 40 , Special Issue 1: Narratives in interviews, Interviews in narrative studies , February 2011 , pp. 13 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Behar, Ruth (2003). The translated woman: Crossing the border with Esperanza's story. New York: Beacon.Google Scholar
Bohmer, Carol, & Shuman, Amy (2007). Rejecting refugees: Political asylum in the 21st century. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, Charles L. (1986). Learning how to ask: A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butters, Ron (2001). Presidential address: Literary qualities in sociolinguistic narratives of personal experience. American Speech 76(3):227–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelletto, Francesca (2003). Long-term memory of extreme events: From autobiography to history. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 9:241–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caruth, Cathy (1995). Trauma: Explorations in memory. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Fina, Anna (2003). Crossing borders: Time, space, and disorientation in narrative. Narrative Inquiry 13(2):367–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Or, Tamar (1992). Do you really know how they make love: The limits on intimacy with ethnographic informants. Qualitative Sociology 15(1):53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, Frederick (1986). Listening and speaking. In Tannen, Deborah & Alatis, James (eds.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1985, 294–319. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra (2003). Plotting the “right place” and the “right time”: Place and time as interactional resources in narrative. Narrative Inquiry 13(2):413–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Faye (1989). Contested lives: The abortion debate in an American community. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith (1996). Shadow conversations: The indeterminacy of participant roles. In Silverstein, Michael & Urban, Greg (eds.), Natural histories of discourse, 131–59. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William (1984). Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In Baugh, John & Sherzer, Joel (eds.), Language in use: Readings in sociolinguistics, 28–53. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen (1988). Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman's concepts of participation. In Drew, Paul & Wootton, Anthony (eds.), Erving Goffman: An interdisciplinary appreciation, 161–227. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Mishler, Elliot G. (1986). Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickford, John R., & Rafal, Christine Théberge (1996). Preterite had + V-ed in the narratives of African-American adolescents. American Speech 71(3):227–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosaldo, Renato (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah (1984). “Speaking for another” in sociolinguistic interviews: Alignments, identities, and frames. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.), Framing in discourse, 231–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah (2006). In other words: Variation and reference in narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuman, Amy (1986). Storytelling rights: The uses of oral and written texts among urban adolescents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Susan (1982). The epistemology of the horror story. The Journal of American Folklore 95:33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah (1989). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Nessa (1976). Speech events and natural speech: Some implications for sociolinguistic methodology. Language in Society 5(2):189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar