Skip to main content Accessibility help

Pre-empting reference problems in conversation

  • Jan Svennevig (a1)


The topic of this article is how conversationalists deal with emergent problems of reference in the construction of a turn at talk. It analyzes practices for modifying and expanding a turn-constructional unit in progress to accommodate information that will introduce a referent to the interlocutor or check his or her familiarity with it. One set of practices expands the turn after the referring expression has been produced: apokoinou constructions and appositions. A second, and previously undescribed, practice is identified by which speakers insert referent identification before the referring expression has been produced. In this practice, speakers initiate two separate sentence structures and complete them both by merging them in a common complement. This practice has the advantage of embedding the subordinate activity of establishing reference within the main sentence frame, and furthermore minimizes the disruption of sequential progressivity of the talk. (Turn construction, reference, expansions, apokoinou, apposition, progressivity)*



Hide All
Auer, Peter (1984). Referential problems in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 8:627–48.
Auer, Peter (1996). On the prosody and syntax of turn-continuations. In Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Selting, Margret (eds.), Prosody in conversation, 57100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Auer, Peter (2005). Delayed self-repairs as a structuring device for complex turns in conversation. In Hakulinen, Auli & Selting, Margret (eds.), Syntax and lexis in conversation: Studies on the use of linguistic resources in talk-in-interaction, 75102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chafe, Wallace (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Clark, Herbert H. (1992). Arenas of language use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Clark, Herbert H. (1994). Managing problems in speaking. Speech Communication 15:243–50.
Clark, Herbert H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, Herbert H. (1998). Communal lexicons. In Malmkjaer, Kirsten & Williams, John (eds.), Context in language learning and language understanding, 6387. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, Herbert H., & Marshall, Catherine (1992 [1981]). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In Clark, Herbert H., Arenas of language use, 959. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Clark, Herbert H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, Deanna (1992 [1986]). Referring as a collaborative process. In Clark, Herbert H., Arenas of language use, 107–43. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ford, Cecilia, & Fox, Barbara (1996). Interactional motivations for reference formulation: He had. This guy had, a beautiful, thirty-two O:lds. In Fox, Barbara (ed.), Studies in anaphora, 146–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goodwin, Charles, & Goodwin, Marjorie H. (1986). Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica 62:5175.
Gundel, Jeanette K.; Hedberg, Nancy; & Zacharsky, Ron (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69:274307.
Hakulinen, Auli, & Selting, Margret (eds.) (2005). Syntax and lexis in conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Halliday, Michael A. K. (1987). Spoken and written modes of meaning. In Horowitz, Rosalind & Samuels, S. Jay (eds.), Comprehending oral and written language. New York: Academic Press.
Hawkins, John A. (1991). On (in)definite articles: Implicatures and (un)grammaticality prediction. Journal of Linguistics 27:405–42.
Hayashi, Makoto (2005). Referential problems and turn construction: An exploration of an intersection between grammar and interaction. Text 25:437–68.
Heritage, John (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its deployment. In Atkinson, J. Maxwell & Heritage, John (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, 299345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, John (2007). Intersubjectivity and progressivity in person (and place) reference. In Enfield, Nick J. & Stivers, Tanya (eds.), Person reference in interaction, 255–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jefferson, Gail (1972). Side sequences. In Sudnow, David (ed.), Studies in social interaction, 295331. New York: Free Press.
Labov, William (1972). The study of language in its social context. In Giglioli, Pier Paolo (ed.), Language and social context, 283308. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Levinson, Stephen C. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lie, Svein (2008). Veldig sånn festejente. In Johannessen, Janne Bondi & Hagen, Kristin (eds.), Språk i Oslo: Ny forskning omkring talespråk, 7895. Oslo: Novus.
Lindström, Anna (1999). Language as social action. Grammar, prosody, and interaction in Swedish conversation. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
Linell, Per (2005). En dialogisk grammatik? In Anward, Jan & Nordberg, Bengt (eds.), Samtal och grammatik: Studier i svenskt samtalsspråk, 231328. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Mazeland, Harrie (2007). Parenthetical sequences. Journal of Pragmatics 39:1816–69.
Norén, Niklas (2007). Apokoinou in Swedish talk-in-interaction: A family of methods for grammatical construction and the resolving of local communicative projects. Linköping: Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication.
Nota Oslo: Norwegian corpus of spoken language, the Oslo part. Text laboratory, Department of Linguistics and Scandinavian Studies, University of Oslo.
Ochs, Elinor; Schegloff, Emanuel A.; & Thompson, Sandra (eds.) (1996). Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Prince, Ellen F. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Cole, Peter (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 223–55. New York: Academic Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1979). The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In Givon, Talmy (ed.), Discourse and syntax, 261–86. New York: Academic Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1996a). Some practices for referring to persons in talk-in-interaction: A partial sketch of a systematics. In Fox, Barbara (ed.), Studies in anaphora, 437–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1996b). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Thompson, Sandra (eds.), Interaction and grammar, 52133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schiffrin, Deborah (1994). Approaches to discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.
Schiffrin, Deborah (2006). In other words: Variation in reference and narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Selting, Margret, & Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (eds.) (2001). Studies in interactional linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Stoltenburg, Benjamin (2003). Parenthesen im gesprochenen Deutsch. InLiSt (Interaction and Linguistic Structure) 34:140.
Svennevig, Jan (1999). Getting acquainted in conversation: A study of initial interactions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Svennevig, Jan (2004). Other-repetition as display of hearing, understanding and emotional stance. Discourse Studies 6:489516.
Svennevig, Jan (2008). Trying the easiest solution first in other-initiation of repair. Journal of Pragmatics 40:333–48.
Walker, Gareth (2007). On the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 39:2217–43.

Pre-empting reference problems in conversation

  • Jan Svennevig (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed