Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T21:59:35.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quechua's loss, Spanish's gain1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Claire Lefebvre
Claire Lefebvre
Affiliation:
Université du Québec à Montréal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to illustrate an aspect of the adaptive property of languages. While scholars have shown that expansion in function is correlated with expansion of the linguistic structure, I show that a loss of function by a language may entail a loss of a particular linguistic distinction. The data used to illustrate this point are drawn from the bilingual community of Cuzco, Peru. (Language contact, the adaptive property of languages, linguistic variation, linguistic change.)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 8 , Issue 2-3 , August 1979 , pp. 395 - 407
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Brown, R., & Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Sebeok, T. (ed.), Style in language. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 253–76.Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1975). Polite plural and predicate agreement. Language 51, (2). 406–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Sciullo, A. M., Van Ameringen, A., Cedergren, H., & Pupier, P. (1976). Étude de l'interaction verbale chez des montréalais d'origine italienne. In La sociolinguistique au Québec, Les Cahiers de, linguistique no. 6. Les presses de l'Université du Québec. 127–53.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1967). Sociolinguistics. In Fishman, J. (ed.), Advances in the Sociology of Language, Vol. 1 (1971). The Hague—Paris: Mouton. 15–92.Google Scholar
Geogheghan, W. (1969). The use of marking rules in semantic systems, Working paper 26. Language Behavior Research Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. (1964). Linguistic and social interaction in two communities. In Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. (eds), The ethnography of communication. American Anthropologist 66, (6) Part II. 137–53.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. (1968). Speech Communities. Internal Encyclopedia of Social Sciences 9. 381–6.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J., & Hernandez, E. (1969). Cognitive aspects of bilingual communication. Working paper 28. Language Behavior Research Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1971). Introduction to parts I, II and III. Pidginization and Creolization of Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (ms.). On the adequacy of natural languages. The development of tense.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, C. (1971) La sélection des codes linguistiques à Ia Martinique: Un modèle de communication. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, C.(1975). Plural agreement in Cuzco Quechua: Some aspects of variation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, C. (1976). A sociolinguistic survey of Cuzco Quechua: sampling procedures and data collection. Anthropological Linguistics 18 (7). 328–39.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, C., & Dubuisson, C. (forthcoming) “Agreement in Cuzco Quechua,” In Weber, D. & Adelaar, W. (eds), (Title not determined as yet).Google Scholar
Sankoff, G. (1971). Language use in multilingual societies: Some alternative approaches in sociolinguistics. In Pride, J. B. & Holmes, J. (eds), Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth, Middlesex (GB): Penguin Books. 33–51.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G., & Laberge, S. (1973). On the acquisition of native speakers by a language. Kivung 6, 32–47.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G., & Brown, P. (1976). The origin of syntax in discourse. Language 52 (3). 631–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solà, D. (1972). Quechua language handbook (ms.). Center for Applied Linguistics, Washington DC.Google Scholar