Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T13:02:29.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of the descriptor ‘broken English’ in ideologies about nonnative speech

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2017

Stephanie Lindemann  and
Katherine Moran
Stephanie Lindemann*
Affiliation:
Georgia State University, USA
Katherine Moran
Affiliation:
Georgia State University, USA
*
Address for correspondence: Stephanie Lindemann, Department of Applied Linguistics and ESL, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 4099, Atlanta, GA 30302-4099, USAlindemann@gsu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigates how the descriptor ‘broken English’ is used to construct speakers as nonnative within standard language ideology. In-depth analysis of examples found through WebCorp, used to search US websites, and the Corpus of Contemporary American English found that the term was largely used to refer to comprehensible English identified as nonnative. Users of such English were constructed as Other, usually highly negatively. The rarer cases of more positive descriptions referred to encounters outside English-speaking countries, consistent with monolingualist ideology, and when used for a more distantly superior person, made them more attractive through greater apparent accessibility. Four mechanisms are discussed by which use of the term naturalizes ideologies. Crucially, its ambiguity promotes slippage between ‘neutral’ and negative uses, allowing any English identified as nonnative to be characterized as ‘broken’, slipping into ‘not English’, with such descriptions treated as an acceptable way to identify nonnative speakers as public menace. (Standard language ideology, ideology of nativeness, monolingualist ideology, Othering, corpus-informed research)*

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 46 , Issue 5 , November 2017 , pp. 649 - 669
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The authors wish to thank Diane Belcher, Eliana Hirano, and Paula Golombek and others at the University of Florida for their helpful comments and discussion on earlier presentations of this material, and Matthew Nelson, Stephen Skalicky, two anonymous reviewers, and editor Jenny Cheshire for their helpful feedback on earlier versions of the manuscript. Remaining flaws are of course our own.

References

REFERENCES

Aronson, Elliot; Willerman, Ben; & Floyd, Joanne (1966). The effect of a pratfall on increasing interpersonal attractiveness. Psychonomic Science 4:227–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Paul; Gabrielatos, Costas; KhosraviNik, Majid; Krzyżanowski, Michał; McEnery, Tony; & Wodak, Ruth (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society 19:273–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan; Collins, James; & Slembrouck, Stef (2005). Spaces of multilingualism. Language & Communication 25:197–216.Google Scholar
Cargile, Aaron Castelan (1997). Attitudes toward Chinese-accented speech: An investigation in two contexts. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 16:434–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cargile, Aaron Castelan, & Giles, Howard (1998). Language attitudes toward varieties of English: An American-Japanese context. Journal of Applied Communication Research 26:338–56.Google Scholar
Cargile, Aaron Castelan; Maeda, Eriko; Rodriguez;, Jose & Rich, Marc (2010). ‘Oh, you speak English so well!’: U.S. American listeners’ perceptions of ‘foreignness’ among nonnative speakers. Journal of Asian American Studies 13:59–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark (2008-). The corpus of contemporary American English: 400 million words, 1990-present. Online: http://corpus.byu.edu/bnc/old/?b=x1&c=bnc&q=17774111&q1=17774113.Google Scholar
Dick, Hilary Parsons (2011). Making immigrants illegal in small-town USA. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 21: E35–E55.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Grace, George W. (1992). How do languages change? (More on ‘aberrant’ languages). Oceanic Linguistics 31:115–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardt-Mautner, Gerlinde (1995). ‘Only connect’: Critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics. UCREL Technical Paper 6. Lancaster: Lancaster University.Google Scholar
Henry, Eric Steven (2010). Interpretations of ‘Chinglish’: Native speakers, language learners and the enregisterment of a stigmatized code. Language in Society 39:669–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Jane H. (1999). Language, race, and white public space. American Anthropologist 100:680–89.Google Scholar
Hodges, Brad (2015). Ideologies of language and race in US media discourse about the Trayvon Martin shooting. Language in Society 44:401–23.Google Scholar
Hu, Guiling, & Lindemann, Stephanie (2009). Stereotypes of Cantonese English, apparent native/non-native status, and their effect on non-native English speakers’ perception. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 30:253–69.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T., & Gal, Susan (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Kroskrity, Paul V. (ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities, 35–83. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, Celia, & Frith, Hannah (1999). Just say no? The use of conversation analysis in developing a feminist perspective on sexual refusal. Discourse and Society 10:293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, David Y. W. (2008). Corpora and discourse analysis: New ways of doing old things. In Bhatia, Vijay K., Flowerdew, John, & Jones, Rodney H. (eds.), Advances in discourse studies, 86–99. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lindemann, Stephanie (2003). Koreans, Chinese, or Indians? Attitudes and ideologies about non-native English speakers in the United States. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7:348–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindemann, Stephanie (2005). Who speaks ‘broken English’? US undergraduates’ perceptions of non-native English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 15:187–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippi-Green, Rosina (2012). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lo, Adrienne, & Kim, Jenna (2011). Manufacturing citizenship: Metapragmatic framings of language competencies in media images of mixed race men in South Korea. Discourse & Society 22:440–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mautner, Gerlinde (2005). Time to get wired: Using web-based corpora in critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society 16:809–28.Google Scholar
Milroy, James (2001). Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5:530–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagliai, Valentina (2009). Conversational agreement and racial formation processes. Language in Society 38:549–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Ellen Bouchard, & Bulik, Cynthia M. (1982). Evaluations of middle class and lower class speakers of standard American and German-accented English. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 1:51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Ellen Bouchard, & Sebastian, Richard J. (1980). The effects of speech style and social class background on social judgements of speakers. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 19:229–33.Google Scholar
Santa Ana, Otto (1999). ‘Like an animal I was treated’: Anti-immigrant metaphor in US public discourse. Discourse & Society 10:191–224.Google Scholar
Shuck, Gail (2004). Conversational performance and the poetic construction of an ideology. Language in Society 33:195–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuck, Gail (2006). Racializing the nonnative English speaker. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 5:259–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subtirelu, Nicholas Close (2015). ‘She does have an accent but…’: Race and language ideology in students’ evaluations of mathematics instructors on RateMyProfessors.com. Language in Society 44:35–62.Google Scholar
Wiley, Terrence G., & Lukes, Marguerita (1996). English-only and standard language ideologies in the U.S. TESOL Quarterly 30:511–35.Google Scholar