Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Theorizing identity in language and sexuality research

  • MARY BUCHOLTZ (a1) and KIRA HALL (a2)

The field of language and sexuality has gained importance within socioculturally oriented linguistic scholarship. Much current work in this area emphasizes identity as one key aspect of sexuality. However, recent critiques of identity-based research advocate instead a desire-centered view of sexuality. Such an approach artificially restricts the scope of the field by overlooking the close relationship between identity and desire. This connection emerges clearly in queer linguistics, an approach to language and sexuality that incorporates insights from feminist, queer, and sociolinguistic theories to analyze sexuality as a broad sociocultural phenomenon. These intellectual approaches have shown that research on identity, sexual or otherwise, is most productive when the concept is understood as the outcome of intersubjectively negotiated practices and ideologies. To this end, an analytic framework for the semiotic study of social intersubjectivity is presented.We are deeply indebted to Rusty Barrett, Jennifer Coates, Rudi Gaudio, Donna Goldstein, Jane Hill, Sally McConnell-Ginet, Bonnie McElhinny, Robin Queen, and Sara Trechter for their incisive comments on an earlier version of this article. In-depth conversations with Stacey Duke, Deena Hill, Anna Livia, and Jon McCammond helped us work through many thorny issues. For helpful feedback on oral presentations of some of this material, we are also grateful to audiences at the International Gender and Language Association Conference in Lancaster, the Lavender Languages and Linguistics Conference, the Department of Linguistics at Stanford University, and the Department of Anthropology at the University of Chicago; special thanks to James Fernandez for detailed suggestions. Any remaining weaknesses are our own responsibility.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Agha, Asif (1998). Stereotypes and registers of honorific language. Language in Society27:15193.

Agha, Asif (2003a). The social life of cultural value. Language and Communication23:23173.

Bourdieu, Pierre (1977). The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information16:64568.

Braun, Virginia, & Kitzinger, Celia (2001). Telling it straight?: Dictionary definitions of women's genitals. Journal of Sociolinguistics5:21432.

Bucholtz, Mary (1999a). You da man: Narrating the racial other in the linguistic production of white masculinity. Journal of Sociolinguistics3:44360.

Bucholtz, Mary (1999b). “Why be normal?”: Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls. Language in Society28:20323.

Bucholtz, Mary (2001). The whiteness of nerds: Superstandard English and racial markedness. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology11:84100.

Bucholtz, Mary (2003). Sociolinguistic nostalgia and the authentication of identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics7:398416.

Cameron, Deborah, & Kulick, Don (2003b). Introduction: Language and desire in theory and practice. Language and Communication23:93105.

Eckert, Penelope, & McConnell-Ginet, Sally (1992). Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology21:46190.

Freed, Alice F. (1999). Communities of practice and pregnant women: Is there a connection?Language in Society28:25771.

Gaudio, Rudolf P. (2001). White men do it too: Racialized (homo)sexualities in postcolonial Hausaland. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology11:3651.

Ginsburg, Faye (1987). Procreation stories: Reproduction, nurturance, and procreation in life narratives of abortion activists. American Ethnologist14:62336.

Goodwin, Charles (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist96:60633.

Herring, Susan C. (1999). The rhetorical dynamics of gender harassment on-line. Information Society15:15167.

Huffer, Lynne (2001). “There is no Gomorrah”: Narrative ethics in feminist and queer theory. Differences12(3):132.

Kulick, Don (1997). The gender of Brazilian transgendered prostitutes. American Anthropologist99:57485.

Kulick, Don (2000). Gay and lesbian language. Annual Review of Anthropology29:24385.

Kulick, Don (2003b). No. Language and Communication23:13951.

Mendoza-Denton, Norma (1996). “Muy macha”: Gender and ideology in gang-girls' discourse about makeup. Ethnos61:4763.

Murray, Stephen O. (1999). Review of Queerly Phrased: Language, Gender, and Sexuality. Language in Society28:3048.

Patthey-Chavez, G. Genevieve; Claire, Lindsay; & Youmans, Madeleine (1996). Watery passion: The struggle between hegemony and sexual liberation in erotic fiction for women. Discourse and Society7:77106.

Queen, Robin M. (1998). “Stay queer!” “Never fear!”: Building queer social networks. World Englishes17:20314.

Silverstein, Michael (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication23:193229.

Stokoe, Elizabeth H., & Weatherall, Ann (eds.) (2002). Gender, language, conversation analysis, and feminism. Special issue ofDiscourse and Society13(6).

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Language in Society
  • ISSN: 0047-4045
  • EISSN: 1469-8013
  • URL: /core/journals/language-in-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 30
Total number of PDF views: 352 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1031 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.