Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Three orders in the organization of human action: On the interface between knowledge, power, and emotion in interaction and social relations

  • Melisa Stevanovic (a1) and Anssi Peräkylä (a2)
Abstract

All social life is based on people's ability to recognize what others are doing. Recently, the mechanisms underlying this human ability have become the focus of a growing multidisciplinary interest. This article contributes to this line of research by considering how people's orientations to who they are to each other are built-in in the organization action. We outline a unifying theoretical framework in which the basic facets of human social relations are seen as being anchored in three orders—epistemic order, deontic order, and emotional order—each of which, we argue, also pertains to action recognition. This framework allows us to account for common ambiguities in action recognition and to describe relationship negotiations involving a complex interface between knowledge, power, and emotion. (Action recognition, social relations, conversation analysis, status, stance, epistemic rights, deontic rights, emotion)*

Copyright
References
Hide All
Abrahams, Roger D. (1962). Playing the dozens. Journal of American Folklore 75:209–20.
Antaki, Charles (2012). Affiliative and disaffiliative candidate understandings. Discourse Studies 14:531–47.
Antaki, Charles, & Kent, Alexandra (2012). Telling people what to do (and, sometimes, why): Contingency, entitlement and explanation in staff requests to adults with intellectual impairments. Journal of Pragmatics 44:876–89.
Atkinson, John Maxwell, & Drew, Paul (1979). Order in court: The organisation of verbal interaction in judicial settings. London: Macmillan.
Austin, John L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Becchio, Cristina; Cavallo, Andrea; Begliomini, Chiara; Sartori, Luisa; Feltrin, Giampietro; & Castiello, Umberto (2012). Social grasping: From mirroring to mentalizing. Neuroimage 61:240–48.
Bühler, Karl (1934/2011). Theory of language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cekaite, Asta (2012). Affective stances in teacher-novice student interactions: Language, embodiment, and willingness to learn in a Swedish primary classroom. Language in Society 41:641–70.
Clark, Herbert H. (1979). Responding to indirect speech acts. Cognitive Psychology 11:430–77.
Clark, Herbert H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (2012). Exploring affiliation in the reception of conversational complaint stories. In Peräkylä & Sorjonen, 113–46.
Curl, Traci S. (2006). Offers of assistance: Constraints on syntactic design. Journal of Pragmatics 38:1257–80.
Curl, Traci S., & Drew, Paul (2008). Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41:129–53.
Drew, Paul (1987). Po-faced receipts of teases. Linguistics 25:219–53.
Drew, Paul (2012). What drives sequences? Research on Language and Social Interaction 45:6168.
Drew, Paul, & Walker, Traci (2009). Going too far: Complaining, escalating and disaffiliation. Journal of Pragmatics 41:2400–14.
Edwards, Derek (1999). Emotion discourse. Culture & Psychology 5:271–91.
Eisenberg, Ann R. (1986). Teasing: Verbal play in two Mexican homes. In Schieffelin, Bambi B. & Ochs, Eleanor (eds.), Language socialization across cultures: Studies in the social and cultural foundations of language, 182–98. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ellsworth, Phoebe C., & Scherer, Klaus R. (2003). Appraisal process in emotion. In Davidson, Richard J., Scherer, Klaus R., & Goldsmith, H. Hill (eds.), Handbook of affective sciences, 572–95. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Enfield, Nicholas (2011). Sources of asymmetry in human interaction: Enchrony, status, knowledge and agency. In Stivers, Tanya, Mondada, Lorenza, & Steensig, Jacob (eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation, 285312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ervin-Tripp, Susan (1976). Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives. Language in Society 5:2566.
Givón, Talmy (2005). Context as other minds: The pragmatics of sociality, cognition and communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goffman, Erving (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Garden City: Doubleday.
Goffman, Erving (1981). Forms of talk. Oxford: Blackwell.
Goffman, Erving (1983). The interaction order. American Sociological Review 48:117.
Goodwin, Charles (1979). The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In Psathas, George (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology, 97121. New York: Irvington.
Goodwin, Charles (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society 18:5373.
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness (2007). Occasioned knowledge exploration in family interaction. Discourse & Society 18:93110.
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness; Cekaite;, Asta & Goodwin, Charles (2012). Emotion as stance. In Peräkylä & Sorjonen, 1641.
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness, & Goodwin, Charles (2000). Emotion within situated activity. In Budvig, Nancy, Uzgiris, Ina C., & Wertsch, Jim (eds.), Communication: An arena of development, 3354. Stamford, CT: Ablex.
Greatbatch, David (1986). Aspects of topical organization in news interviews: The use of agenda shifting procedures by interviewees. Media, Culture & Society 8:441–55.
Gumperz, John (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heinemann, Trine (2006). “Will you or can't you?”: Displaying entitlement in interrogative requests. Journal of Pragmatics 38:1081–104.
Heller, Monica (ed.) (1988). Codeswitching: Anthropological and sociolinguistic perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Heritage, John (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.
Heritage, John (2005). Revisiting authority in physician-patient interaction. In Duchan, Judith F. & Kovarsky, Dan (eds.), Diagnosis as cultural practice, 83102. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Heritage, John (2011). Territories of knowledge, territories of experience: Empathic moments in interaction. In Mondada, Stivers, & Steensig, 159–83.
Heritage, John (2012a). Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45:129.
Heritage, John (2012b). The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45:3052.
Heritage, John, & Raymond, Geoffrey (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 68:1538.
Hochschild, Arlie (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology 39:551–75.
Hochschild, Arlie (1983). The managed heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Houtkoop, Hanneke (1990). Accounting for proposals. Journal of Pragmatics 14:111–24.
Jaffe, Alexandra (2009). Introduction: The sociolinguistics of stance. In Jaffe, Alexandra (ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives, 328. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jakobson, Roman (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Sebeok, Thomas A. (ed.), Style in language, 350–77. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Keltner, Dacher; Capps, Lisa; Kring, Ann M.; Young, Randall C.; & Heerey, Erin A. (2001). Just teasing: A conceptual analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin 127:229–48.
Kent, Alexandra (2012). Compliance, resistance and incipient compliance when responding to directives. Discourse Studies 14(6):711–30.
Kovarsky, Dana; Curran;, Maura & Nichols, Nicole Zobel (2009). Laughter and communicative engagement in interaction. Seminars in Speech and Language 30:2736.
Kreuz, Roger J.; Kassler, Max A.; Coppenrath, Lori; & Allen, Bonnie McLain (1999). Tag questions and common ground effects in the perception of verbal irony. Journal of Pragmatics 31:16851700.
Labov, William (1972). Rules for ritual insults. In Sudnow, David (ed.), Studies in social interaction, 297353. New York: Free Press.
Langlotz, Andreas, & Locher, Miriam A. (2012). Ways of communicating emotional stance in online disagreements. Journal of Pragmatics 44:15911606.
Levinson, Stephen C. (2012). Action formation and ascription. In Stivers, Tanya & Sidnell, Jack (eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis, 103–30. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
Lindström, Anna (2005). Language as social action: A study of how senior citizens request assistance with practical tasks in the Swedish home help service. In Hakulinen, Auli & Selting, Margret (eds.), Syntax and lexis in conversation, 209–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Macbeth, Douglas (1991). Teacher authority as practical action. Linguistics and Education 3:281313.
Marsch, Abigail A.; Kozak, Megan N.; Wegner, Daniel M.; Reid, Marguerite E.; Yu, Henry H.; & Blair, R. J. R. (2010). The neural substrates of action identification. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 5:392403.
Maynard, Douglas W., & Freese, Jeremy (2012). Good news, bad news, and affect: Practical and temporal “emotion work” in everyday life. In Peräkylä & Sorjonen, 92112.
McKinlay, Andy, & McVittie, Chris (2006). Using topic control to avoid the gainsaying of troublesome evaluations. Discourse Studies 8:797815.
Ogden, Richard (2010). Prosodic constructions in making complaints. In Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar, Reber, Elisabeth, & Selting, Margret (eds.), Prosody in interaction, 81104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Parsons, Talcott (1951). The social system. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Pavey, Emma (2010). The structure of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peräkylä, Anssi (1998). Authority and accountability: The delivery of diagnosis in primary health care. Social Psychology Quarterly 61:301–20.
Peräkylä (2012). Epilogue. In Peräkylä & Sorjonen, 274–89.
Peräkylä, & Sorjonen, Marja-Leena (eds.) (2012). Emotion in interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pomerantz, Anita M. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies 9:219–30.
Putnam, Linda L. (2007). Contradictions in the metatalk about feelings in corporation: After Mr. Sam. In Cooren, François (ed.), Interacting and organizing: Analyses of a management meeting, 95111. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Raymond, Geoffrey, & Heritage, John (2006). The epistemics of social relations: Owning grandchildren. Language in Society 35:677705.
Rizzolatti, Giacomo, & Craighero, Laila (2004). The mirror neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience 27:169–92.
Ruusuvuori, Johanna (2000). Control in the medical consultation: Practices of giving and receiving the reason for the visit in primary health care. Tampere: Department of Sociology and Social Psychology, University of Tampere dissertation.
Ruusuvuori, Johanna, & Peräkylä, Anssi (2009). Facial and verbal expression in assessing stories and topics. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43:377–94.
Sacks, Harvey (1972a). An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In Sudnow, David (ed.), Studies in social interaction, 3174. New York: Free Press.
Sacks, Harvey (1972b). On the analyzability of stories by children. In Gumperz, John J. & Hymes, Dell H. (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication, 325–45. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Sacks, Harvey (1992). Lectures on conversation, vol. 1. Ed. by Jefferson, Gail. Oxford: Blackwell.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2001). Getting serious: Joke → serious “no.” Journal of Pragmatics 33:1947–55.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2007a). A tutorial on membership categorization. Journal of Pragmatics 39:462–82.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2007b). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel A., & Sacks, Harvey (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica 8:289327.
Schiffrin, Deborah (1994). Approaches to discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.
Searle, John R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society 5:123.
Selting, Margret (1994). Emphatic speech style—with special focus on the prosodic signaling of heightened emotive involvement in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 22:375408.
Selting, Margret (2010). Affectivity in conversational storytelling: An analysis of displays of anger or indignation in complaint stories. Pragmatics 20:229–77.
Sidnell, Jack (2012). Declaratives, questioning, defeasibility. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45:5360.
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena, & Peräkylä, Anssi (2012). Introduction. In Peräkylä & Sorjonen, 315.
Sperber, Dan, & Wilson, Deirdre (1986). Relevance, communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Spunt, Robert P.; Satpute;, Ajay B. & Lieberman, Matthew D. (2011). Identifying the what, why, and how of an observed action: An fMRI study of mentalizing and mechanizing during action observation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23:6374.
Stevanovic, Melisa (2011). Participants' deontic rights and action formation: The case of declarative requests for action. Interaction and Linguistic Structures (InLiSt) 52.
Stevanovic, Melisa (2012a). Establishing joint decisions in a dyad. Discourse Studies 14:125.
Stevanovic, Melisa (2012b). Prosodic salience and the emergence of new decisions: On the prosody of approval in Finnish workplace interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 44:843–62.
Stevanovic, Melisa, & Peräkylä, Anssi (2012). Deontic authority in interaction: The right to announce, propose, and decide. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45:297321.
Stivers, Tanya (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41:3157.
Stivers, Tanya, & Hayashi, Makoto (2010). Transformative answers: One way to resist a question's constraints. Language in Society 39:125.
Stivers, Tanya; Mondada;, Lorenza & Steensig, Jakob (eds.) (2011). The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stivers, Tanya, & Rossano, Federico (2010). Mobilising response. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43:331.
Tannen, Deborah (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Morrow.
Tomasello, Michael (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Tykkyläinen, Tuula, & Laakso, Minna (2009). Five-year-old girls negotiating pretend play: Proposals with the Finnish particle jooko. Journal of Pragmatics 42:242–56.
van Berkum, Jos J. A.; van den Brink, Danielle; Tesink, Cathelijne M. J. Y.; Kos, Miriam; & Hagoort, Peter (2008). The neural integration of speaker and message. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20:580–91.
van Overwalle, Frank, & Baetens, Kris (2009). Understanding others' actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: A meta-analysis. Neuroimage 48:564–84.
Wardhaugh, Ronald (2010). An introduction to sociolinguistics. 6th edn.West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
Wilce, James M. (2009). Language and emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Language in Society
  • ISSN: 0047-4045
  • EISSN: 1469-8013
  • URL: /core/journals/language-in-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed