Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-frp75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T00:32:57.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamic Assessment and second language development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2020

Matthew E. Poehner  and
Zhaoyu Wang
Matthew E. Poehner*
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University, USA
Zhaoyu Wang
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: mep158@psu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This timeline is concerned with Dynamic Assessment (henceforth, DA) as it has been taken up and elaborated in contexts involving the teaching, learning, and assessment of learners of second languages (L2s). DA is distinguished by its insistence that an individual's independent performance of assessment tasks reveals only part of his/her abilities, namely those that have completed their development at the time of the assessment; insights into abilities that have begun to emerge but have not yet fully developed can be determined according to an individual's responsiveness to particular kinds of support, referred to as mediation (e.g., reminders, leading questions, hints, provision of a model, feedback), offered during the assessment as difficulties arise (Haywood & Lidz, 2006). In this respect, DA differs from more conventional distinctions in assessment, such as that between assessments concerned with the results of previous learning (‘summative assessment’) and those intended to provide information relevant to subsequent instruction (‘formative assessment’). Instead, the embedding of an interactive, instructional element within the assessment procedure allows for the possibility of expanding the evidential basis upon which summative interpretations of learner abilities are made; that is, the results encompass previous learning that has resulted in both complete and partial understanding of relevant concepts. At the same time, DA serves a formative function in so far as interaction allows insights into the underlying sources of learner difficulties and the kind of support to which they are most responsive (Sternberg & Grigorenko, 2002).

Information

Type
Research Timeline
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , October 2021 , pp. 472 - 490
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Antón, M. (2003). Dynamic assessment of advanced foreign language learners. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Applied Linguistics. Washington, DC. March.Google Scholar
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M. B. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The Learning Potential Assessment Device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Frawley, W., & Lantolf, J. P. (1985). Second language discourse: A Vygotskyan perspective. Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 19–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haywood, H. C., & Lidz, C. S. (2006). Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozulin, A. (1998). Psychological tools: A sociocultural approach to education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J. P., Xi, J., & Minakova, V. (forthcoming). Timeline: Sociocultural theory and concept-based language instruction (C-BLI). Language Teaching.Google Scholar
Lidz, C. S., & Elliott, J. G. (2000). Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. (1997). ‘Interaction’ in second language performance assessment: Whose performance? Applied Linguistics, 14 (2), 446–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R. (2011). Vygotsky in perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing. The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. In Rieber, R. W. & Carton, A. S. (Eds.), Volume 1: Problems of general psychology, including the volume thinking and speech (pp. 39–285). New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). The problem of age. In Rieber, R. W. (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 5: Child psychology (pp. 187–206). New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar