Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-f97m6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-20T14:19:12.824Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fifty-five years and counting: A half-century of getting it half-right?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2020

Michael McCarthy
Michael McCarthy*
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, UK
*
Email: mactoft@cantab.net
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
First Person Singular
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , July 2021 , pp. 343 - 354
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abbs, B., Ayton, A., & Freebairn, I. (1975). Strategies. Students’ book. London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Amador Moreno, C., McCarthy, M. J., & O'Keeffe, A. (2013). Can English provide a framework for Spanish response tokens? Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics, 2013, 175–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, N., Madden, C., & Krashen, S. D. (1974). Is there a ‘natural sequence’ in adult second language learning? Language Learning, 24(2), 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battistella, E. (1999). The persistence of traditional grammar. In Wheeler, R. S. (Ed.), Language alive in the classroom (pp. 13–22). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Berlitz. (1966). English first book. Paris, France: Societé Internationale des Écoles Berlitz.Google Scholar
Bowker, G. (2011). James Joyce: a biography. London, UK: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
British Council. 2018. Ten trends and innovations in English language teaching for 2018. By Chia Suan Chong. Voices Magazine. Retrieved from: https://www.britishcouncil.org/voices-magazine/ten-trends-innovations-english-language-teaching-2018Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. J., & Johnson, K. (1979). The communicative approach to language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burton, G. (2019). The canon of pedagogical grammar for ELT: A mixed methods study of its evolution, development and comparison with evidence on learner output (Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation). University of Limerick, Ireland.Google Scholar
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. J. (1995). Grammar and the spoken language. Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. J. (1997). Exploring Spoken English. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1964). The development of grammar in child language: discussion. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 29(1), 35–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
COBUILD. (1987). Collins COBUILD English language dictionary. London, UK: Collins.Google Scholar
Collins, P. (2015). Grammatical change in English world-wide. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, G. (1998). The uses of reality: A reply to Ronald Carter. ELT Journal, 52(1), 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duolingo. (2020). Promotional information. Retrieved from: https://www.duolingo.com/.Google Scholar
Empower. (2020). Cambridge English Empower Starter. Sample material. Unit 1. Retrieved from: https://assets.cambridge.org/97811074/65947/excerpt/9781107465947_excerpt.pdfGoogle Scholar
English File. (2020). English File. 4th ed. Sample material. Unit 4A. Retrieved from: http://fdslive.oup.com/www.oup.com/elt/general_content/global/english_file_4e/EF%204e%20Unit%204%20-%20SB,%20TB,%20WB.pdf?cc=gb&selLanguage=en&mode=hubGoogle Scholar
Gottfried, R. (1979). Berlitz schools Joyce. James Joyce Quarterly, 16(3), 223–238.Google Scholar
Graddol, D. (1997). The future of English? A guide to forecasting the popularity of the English language in the 21st century. London, UK: The British Council.Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1951/1957). Papers in linguistics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 190–215.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1961). Categories of the theory of grammar. Word, 17(2), 241–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1966). Lexis as a linguistic level. In Bazell, C. E., Catford, J. C., Halliday, M. A. K., & Robins, R. H. (Eds.), In memory of J. R. Firth (pp. 148–62). London, UK: Longmans.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London, UK: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Harrington, K. (2018). The role of corpus linguistics in the ethnography of a closed community. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, B., & Viney, P. (1978). Streamline English. Departures. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Howatt, A. P. R. (2014). A history of English language teaching. Second edition, with H. G. Widdowson. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, L. (1977). Functions of English. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kachru, B. B. (1985). Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In Quirk, R., & Widdowson, H. G. (Eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures (pp. 11–30). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1975). A communicative grammar of English. London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1994). A communicative grammar of English. 2nd ed. London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Malyuga, E., & McCarthy, M. J. (2018). English and Russian vague category markers in business discourse: Linguistic identity aspects. Journal of Pragmatics, 135, 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarten, J. (2010). Corpus-informed course book design. In O'Keeffe, A., & McCarthy, M. J. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 413–442). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, M. J. (1998). Spoken language and applied linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M. J. (in press). Innovations and challenges in grammar. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M. J., & Carter, R. (1995). Spoken grammar: what is it and how can we teach it? ELT Journal, 49(3), 207–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murakami, A., & Alexopoulou, T. (2016). L1 influence on the acquisition order of English grammatical morphemes: A learner corpus study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(3), 365–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, R. (1973). Kernel Lessons Plus. London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Owen, C. (1996). Do concordances require to be consulted? ELT Journal, 50(3), 219–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, H. E. (1916). Colloquial English. Part I. Substitution tables. Cambridge, UK: W. Heffer and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Palmer, H. E. (1922). The oral method of teaching languages. Cambridge, UK: W. Heffer and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Palmer, H. E. (1924). A grammar of spoken English on a strictly phonetic basis. Cambridge, UK: W. Heffer and Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2012). Lessons from colonial language policies. In González, R. D., & Melis, I. (Eds.), Language ideologies: Critical perspectives on the official English movement (pp. 195–220). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Prodromou, L. (2007). Is ELF a variety of English? English Today, 23(2), 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, J. M. (1966). Beginning the study of lexis. In Bazell, C. E., Catford, J. C., Halliday, M. A. K., & Robins, R. H. (Eds.), In memory of J. R. Firth (pp. 410–30). London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. M. (1991). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. M., & Renouf, A. (1988). A lexical syllabus for language learning. In Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (Eds.), Vocabulary and language teaching (pp. 140–60). London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Smith, R. (2016). Building ‘applied linguistic historiography’: rationale, scope, and methods. Applied Linguistics, 37(1), 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stieglitz, G. J. (1955). The Berlitz method. Modern Language Journal, 39(6), 300–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmis, I. (2015). Corpus linguistics for ELT. Research and practice. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, H. (2000). The limitations of linguistics applied. Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, D. A. (1976). Notional syllabuses: a taxonomy and its relevance to foreign language curriculum development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D. A. (1979). Grammatical, situational and notional syllabuses. In Brumfit, C. J., & Johnson, K. (Eds.), The communicative approach to language teaching (pp. 82–90). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Willis, D. (1990). The lexical syllabus: a new approach to language teaching. London, UK: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Yu, L. (2001). Communicative language teaching in China: progress and resistance. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 194–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar