Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-glrdx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T10:14:03.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genre and academic writing in the disciplines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

Ken Hyland
Ken Hyland*
Affiliation:
Institute of Education, University of London, UKk.hyland@ioe.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The last decade has seen increasing attention given to the notion of genre and its application in language teaching and learning. Genre represents how writers typically use language to respond to recurring situations, pointing to the fact that texts are most successful when they employ conventions that other members of the community find familiar and convincing. This community-based nature of genres suggests that their features will differ across disciplines, encouraging teachers to research the features of the texts their students need in order to make these explicit in their classes. I examine some of the research understandings and practical applications of these views by looking at what the approach offers teachers of academic writing.

Information

Type
Plenary Speeches
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , October 2008 , pp. 543 - 562
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (2002). Critical academic writing and multilingual students. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, F. (1987). Genres as choice. In Reid, I. (ed.), The place of genre in learning: Current debates. Deakin: Deakin University Press, 22–34.Google Scholar
Dudley-Evans, T. & St John, M.-J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Faigley, L. (1986). Competing theories of process: A critique and a proposal. College Composition and Communication 48, 527–542.Google Scholar
Feez, S. (1998). Text-based syllabus design. Sydney: Macquarie University/AMES.Google Scholar
Freedman, A. (1994). ‘Do as I say’: The relationship between teaching and learning new genres. In Freedman, A. & Medway, P. (eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric. London: Taylor & Francis, 191–210.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic books.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd edn.). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hinds, J. (1987). Reader versus writer responsibility: A new typology. In Connor, U. & Kaplan, R. (eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 141–152.Google Scholar
Hoey, M. (2001). Textual interaction: An introduction to written text analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2001)a. Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic articles. Written Communication 18.4, 549–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. (2001)b. Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes 20.3, 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. (2004)a. Graduates' gratitude: The generic structure of dissertation acknowledgements. English for Specific Purposes 23.3, 303–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. (2004)b. Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. (2004)c. Disciplinary discourses. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2006). English for Academic Purposes: An advanced resourcebook. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. (2008). Academic discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students' writing. Language Teaching 39.2, 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, A. M. (1997). Text, role and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Killingsworth, M. & Gilbertson, M. (1992). Signs, genres, and communication in technical communication. Amityville, NY: Baywood.Google Scholar
Knapp, P. & Watkins, M. (1994). Context – text – grammar: Teaching the genres and grammar of school writing in infants and primary classrooms. Sydney: Text Productions.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Kuo, C-H. (1999). The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for Specific Purposes 18.2, 121–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. (1992). English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raimes, A. (1991). Out of the woods: Emerging traditions in the teaching of writing. TESOL Quarterly 25.3, 407–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, W. (1987). Second language grammar: Learning & teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swales, J. (1998). Other floors, other voices: A textography of a small university building. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Swales, J. & Feak, C. (2000). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (2nd edn.). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar