Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-j4fss Total loading time: 0.44 Render date: 2022-09-30T01:21:43.049Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Ways of seeing: The individual and the social in applied linguistics research methodologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2017

Phil Benson*
Affiliation:
Macquarie University, Australiaphilip.benson@mq.edu.au

Abstract

Those who have advocated social approaches to applied linguistics have often been critical of the individualism of second language acquisition (SLA) research. This paper identifies the emergence of a more balanced view of the social and individual in recent work. Adopting Berger's (1972) metaphor of ‘ways of seeing’, it offers a history of applied linguistics based on three eras: the era of ‘the invisible learner’, the era of ‘learner-centredness’, and the era of ‘person-centredness’, which we may now be entering. It suggests dominant research methodologies have led to the particular ways of seeing language learners that are characteristic of each of the three eras. In spite of the critique of individualism, the preference for individual case studies in social approaches is leading to a new theoretical focus on the individual that may be best captured by the term ‘person-centredness’.

Type
Plenary Speeches
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Revised version of a plenary address given at the Psychology of Language Learning (PLL) 2 Conference, University of Jyväskalä, Finland, 24 August 2016.

References

Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology 30, 109137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, P. & Cooker, L. (eds.) (2013). The applied linguistics individual: Sociocultural approaches to identity, agency and autonomy. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seeing. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Block, D. (1996). Not so fast: Some thoughts on theory culling, relativism, accepted findings and the heart and soul of SLA. Applied Linguistics 17.1, 6383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Breen, M. P. (1985). The social context of language learning – a neglected situation? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 7.2, 135158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breen, M. P. (ed.) (2001). Learner contributions to language learning. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. (1998). Language Learning and applied linguistics: A historical sketch. Language Learning 48.4, 465496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Fina, A. (2015). Afterword. In Peters et al. (eds.), 271–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas Fir Group, The (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal 100.S1, 1947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, P. A. & Doherty, L. (2015). Examining agency in (second) language socialization research. In Peters et al. (eds.), 54–72.Google Scholar
Firth, A. & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal 81.3, 285300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Horwitz, E. K. (1987). Surveying student beliefs about language learning. In Wenden, A. & Rubin, J. (eds.), Learner strategies in language learning. London: Prentice Hall, 119129.Google Scholar
Jesperson, O. (1904). How to teach a foreign language. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Kibler, K. A. & Valdés, G. (2016). Conceptualizing language learners: Socioinstitutional mechanisms and their consequences. The Modern Language Journal 100.S1, 96116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, K. A. & Mackey, A. (2016). Research methodology and second language studies: Trends, concerns and new directions. The Modern Language Journal 100.S1, 209227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramsch, C. (2002). Introduction: ‘How can we tell the dancer from the dance’. In Kramsch, C. (ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives. London: Continuum, 130.Google Scholar
Lafford, B. A. (2007). Second language acquisition reconceptualized? The impact of Firth and Wagner. The Modern Language Journal 91 (focus issue), 285300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Sociocultural theory and second language learning: Introduction to the special issue. The Modern Language Journal 78, 418420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. (1996) Second language acquisition theory-building: ‘Letting all the flowers bloom!’ Language Learning 46.4, 713–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. & Pavlenko, A. (2001). (S)econd (L)anguage (A)ctivity theory: Understanding second language learners as people. In Breen (ed.), 141–158.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2001). Individual cognitive/affective learner contributions and differential success in SLA. In Breen (ed.), 12–24.Google Scholar
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy. 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentik.Google Scholar
Mercer, S. & Williams, M. (eds.) (2014). Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton Pierce, B. (1995) Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly 29.1, 931.Google Scholar
Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Norton, B. (2001). Non-participation in imagined communities and the language classroom. In Breen (ed.), 159–171.Google Scholar
Nunan, D. (1988). The learner-centred curriculum: A study in second language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Malley, J. M. & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Peters, D., Gao, X., Miller, E. R. & Vitanova, G. (eds.) (2015). Theorizing and analyzing agency in second language learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pickett, G. D. (1977). The foreign language learning process. ETIC Occasional Report. London: The British Council.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. (1991). Second language learners in a stratified multilingual setting. Applied Linguistics 12.3, 229248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, J. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly 21, 87111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, P. (2003). Self-access as access to ‘self’: Cultural variation in the notions of self and personhood. In Palfreyman, D. & Smith, R. C. (eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures: Language education perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 92109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E. & Yule, G. (1991). Focus on the language learner. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Toohey, K. (2007). Autonomy/agency through socio-cultural lenses. In Barfield, A. & Brown, S. (eds.), Reconstructing autonomy in language education: Inquiry and innovation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 231242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toohey, K. & Norton, B. (2003). Learner autonomy as agency in sociocultural settings. In Palfreyman, D. & Smith, R. C. (eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures: Language education perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 5872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ushioda, E. (2011). Language learning motivation, self and identity: Current theoretical perspectives. Computer Assisted Language Learning 24.3, 199210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenden, A. (2002). Learner development in language learning. Applied Linguistics 23.1, 3255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M., Burden, R. L. & Al-Baharna, S. (2001). Making sense of success and failure: The role of the individual in motivation theory. In Dörnyei, Z. & Schmidt, R. (eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Research Center, 171184.Google Scholar
Wong Fillmore, L. (1991). Second language learning in children: A model of language learning in social context. In Bialystok, E. (ed.), Language processing in bilingual children. Cambridge University Press, 4969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuengler, J. & Miller, E. R. (2006). Cognitive and sociocultural perspectives: Two parallel SLA worlds? TESOL Quarterly 40.1, 3558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Ways of seeing: The individual and the social in applied linguistics research methodologies
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Ways of seeing: The individual and the social in applied linguistics research methodologies
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Ways of seeing: The individual and the social in applied linguistics research methodologies
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *