Adamson B. & Tong Siu Yin A. (2008). Leadership and collaboration in implementing curriculum change in Hong Kong Secondary Schools. Asia Pacific Education Review
Ahn K. (2011). Learning to teach under curriculum reform: The practicum experience in South Korea. In Johnson K. E. & Golombek P. (eds.), Research on second language teacher education. New York, NY: Routledge, 239–253.
Aiello J., Di Martino E. & Di Sabato B. (2017). Preparing teachers in Italy for CLIL: Reflections on assessment, language proficiency and willingness to communicate. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism
Alderson J. C. (2007). The CEFR and the need for more research. The Modern Language Journal
Ali N. L., Hamid M. O. & Moni K. (2011). English in primary education in Malaysia: Policies, outcomes and stakeholders' lived experiences. Current Issues in Language Planning
Baker W. (2008). A critical examination of ELT in Thailand: The role of cultural awareness. RELC Journal
Baldauf R. B., Kaplan R. B., Kamwangamalu N. & Bryant P. (2011). Success or failure of primary second/foreign language programmes in Asia: What do the data tell us? Current Issues in Language Planning
Block D., Gray J. & Holborow M. (2012). Neoliberalism and applied linguistics. London: Routledge.
Breidbach S. & Viebrock B. (2012). CLIL in Germany: Results from recent research in a contested field of education. International CLIL Research Journal
Brisk M. E. (2015). Engaging students in academic literacies: Genre-based pedagogy for K-12 classrooms. New York: Routledge.
Brown H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles (3rd edn.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
Bruton A. (2011). Is CLIL so beneficial, or just selective? Re-evaluating some of the research. System
Bruton A. (2013). CLIL: Some of the reasons why. . . and why not. System
Butler Y. G. (2011). The implementation of communicative and task-based language teaching in the Asia-Pacific Region. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics
Canale M. (1983) From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In Richards J. C. & Schmidt R. W. (eds.), (2013) Language and communication. London: Routledge, 2–28.
Canale M. & Swain M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics
Cenoz J., Genesee F. & Gorter D. (2013). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics
Chen A. (2011). Parents' perspectives on the effects of the primary EFL education policy in Taiwan. Current Issues in Language Planning
Christie F. (2013). Genres and genre theory: A response to Michael Rosen. Changing English
Clark U. (2013). A sense of place: Variation, linguistic hegemony and the teaching of literacy in English. English Teaching
Copland F., Garton S. & Burns A. (2014). Challenges in teaching English to young learners: Global perspectives and local realities. TESOL Quarterly
Coyle D. (2010) Forward. In Y. R. Ruiz de Zarobe & D. Lasagabaster (eds.), vii–viii.
Coyle D., Holmes B. & King L. (2009). Towards an integrated curriculum–CLIL national statement and guidelines. London: The Languages Company.
Coyle D., Hood P. & Marsh D. (2010). CLIL Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cummins J. (2008). BICS and CALP: Empirical and theoretical status of the distinction. In Street B. & Hornberger N. H. (eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, (2nd edn.), Volume 2: Literacy. New York: Springer, 71–83.
Custance B. (2006). Whole-school genre maps: A case study in South Australia. In Whittaker R., O'Donnell M. & McCabe A. (eds.), Language and literacy: Functional approaches. London: Continuum, 144–158.
Dalton-Puffer C. (2011). Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics
Dalton-Puffer C., Llinares A., Lorenzo F. & Nikula T. (2014). ‘You can stand under my umbrella’: Immersion, CLIL and bilingual education. A Response to Cenoz, Genesee & Gorter (2013). Applied Linguistics
Dalton-Puffer C. & Smit U. (2013). Content and language integrated learning: A research agenda. Language Teaching
Dare B. & Polias J. (2004). Language & literacy: Classroom applications of functional grammar. South Australia: Department of Education and Children's Services.
Davison C. & Leung C. (2009). Current issues in English language teacher-based assessment. TESOL Quarterly
Derewianka B. (2003). Trends and issues in genre-based approaches. RELC Journal
Derewianka B. (2012). Knowledge about language in the Australian Curriculum: English. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy
Dix S., Cawkwell G. & Locke T. (2011). New Zealand's literacy strategy: A lengthening tail and wagging dogs. In Goodwyn A. & Fuller C. (eds.), The great literacy debate. London: Routledge, 87–105.
Edge J. & Garton S. (2009). From experience to knowledge in ELT. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Enever J. & Moon J. (2009). New global contexts for teaching Primary ELT: Change and challenge. In Enever J., Moon J. & Raman U. (eds.), Young learner English language policy and implementation: International perspectives. Reading: Garnet Education, 5–21.
Fan C. (2014). The effectiveness of genre-based pedagogy in developing students’ academic literacy in Hong Kong EMI secondary schools. MA Thesis, University of Hong Kong. http://hdl.handle.net/10722/209663.
Fenwick L. (2010). Initiating and sustaining learning about literacy and language across the curriculum within secondary schools. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy
Fernandez R. & Halbach A. (2011). Analysing the situation of teachers in the Madrid bilingual project after four years of implementation. In Ruiz de Zarobe Y., Sierra J. & Gallardo del Puerto F. (eds.), Content and foreign language integrated learning. Contributions to multilingualism in European contexts. Bern: Peter Lang, 241–270.
Fernández Fontecha A. (2009). Spanish CLIL: Research and official actions. In de Zarobe Y. R. & Catalán R. M. Jiménez (eds.), Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 3–21.
Garton S. (2014). Unresolved issues and new challenges in teaching English to young learners: The case of South Korea. Current issues in language planning
Garton S., Copland F. & Burns A. (2011). Investigating global practices in teaching English to young learners. British Council ELT Research Papers 11–01. London: British Council.
Gaynor B. (2014). From language policy to pedagogic practice: Elementary school English in Japan. In Rich S., (ed.), International perspectives on teaching English to young learners. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 66–84.
Gebhard M., Chen I. A. & Britton L. (2014). Miss, nominalization is a nominalization: English language learners’ use of SFL metalanguage and their literacy practices. Linguistics and Education
Gibbons P. (2009). English learners, academic literacy, and thinking: Learning in the challenge zone. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Gibbons P. (2015). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning (2nd edn.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Gilmore A. (2007). Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching
Graddol D. (2006). English next. London: British Council.
Graves K. (2016). Language curriculum design: Possibilities and realities. In Hall G. (ed.), Routledge handbook of English language teaching. London: Routledge, 79–94.
Graves K. (2008). The language curriculum: A social contextual perspective. Language Teaching
Guillamón-Suesta F. & Renau M. L. R. (2015). A critical vision of the CLIL approach in secondary education: A study in the Valencian Community in Spain. Latin American Journal of Content & Language Integrated Learning
Halliday M. A. K. & Matthiessen C. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd edn.. London: Arnold.
Hamid O. M. & Honan E. (2012). Communicative English in the primary classroom: Implications for English-in-education policy and practice in Bangladesh. Language, Culture and Curriculum
Hammond J. (2012). Hope and challenge in the Australian Curriculum: Implications for EAL students and their teachers. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy
Hardman J. & A-Rahman N. (2014). Teachers and the implementation of a new English curriculum in Malaysia. Language, Culture and Curriculum
Heller M., & McLaughlin M. (2016). Language choice and symbolic domination. In Wortham S., Deoksoon K. & May S. (eds.), Discourse and Education. Springer Living Reference Work, 1–9.
Hönig I. (2010). Assessment in CLIL: Theoretical and empirical research. VDM Publishing.
Hüttner J., Dalton-Puffer C. & Smit U. (2013). The power of beliefs: Lay theories and their influence on the implementation of CLIL programmes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism
Hüttner J. & Smit U. (2014). CLIL (Content and language integrated learning): The bigger picture. A response to: A. Bruton. 2013. CLIL: Some of the reasons why and why not. System
Hymes D. (1972). On communicative competence. In Pride J. B. & Holmes J. (eds.), Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 269–293.
İnal D. (2009). The early bird catches the worm: The Turkish case. In Enever J., Moon J. & Raman U. (eds.), Young learner English language policy and implementation: International perspectives. Reading: Garnet Education, 71–78.
Infante D., Benvenuto G. & Lastrucci E. (2008). Integrating content and language at primary school in Italy: Ongoing experimental research. International CLIL Research Journal
Ioannou Georgiou S. (2012). Reviewing the puzzle of CLIL. ELT Journal
Kang D-M. (2008). The classroom language use of a Korean elementary school EFL teacher: Another look at TETE. System
Kantarcioglŭ E. & Papageorgiou S. (2012). The Common European Framework of Reference. In Coombe C., Davidson P., O'Sullivan B. & Stoynoff S. (eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 82–88.
Larsen-Freeman D. & Freeman D. (2008). Language moves: The place of languages – foreign and otherwise – in classroom teaching and learning. In J. Greene, G. Kelly & A. Luke. (eds.), Review of Research on Education
Lasagabaster D. & Ruiz de Zarobe Y. (2010). Ways forward in CLIL: Provision issues and future planning. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & D. Lasagabaster (eds.), 278–295.
Lasagabaster D. & Sierra J. M. (2010). Immersion and CLIL in English: More differences than similarities. ELT Journal
Lee I. (2012). Genre-based teaching and assessment in secondary English classrooms. English Teaching: Practice and Critique
Lin A. (2012). Multilingual and multimodal resources in genre-based pedagogical approaches to L2 English content classrooms. In Leung C. & Street B. V. (eds.), English: A changing medium for education. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 79–103.
Lin A. M. Y. (2010). Curriculum: Foreign language learning. In Peterson P., Baker E. & McGaw B. (eds.), International encyclopedia of education volume 1 (3rd edn.). Oxford: Elsevier, 428–434.
Llinares A., Morton T. & Whittaker R. (2012). The roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Little D. (2007). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Perspectives on the making of supranational language education policy. The Modern Language Journal
91.4, 645– 655.
Lorenzo F. (2010). CLIL in Andalusia. In Ruiz de Zarobe Y. & Lasagabaster D. (eds.), 2–11.
Lorenzo F. (2013). Genre-based curricula: Multilingual academic literacy in content and language integrated learning. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism
Lorenzo F., Casal S. & Moore P. (2010). The effects of content and language integrated learning in European education: Key findings from the Andalusian bilingual sections evaluation project. Applied Linguistics
Lorenzo F. & Moore P. (2010). On the natural emergence of language structures in CLIL: Towards a theory of European educational bilingualism. In Dalton-Puffer C., Nikula T. & Smit U. (eds.), Language use and language learning in CLIL classrooms. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 23–38.
Luardini M. A. & Asi N. (2014). An analysis of linguistic competence in writing texts by teachers in Palangka Raya. International Journal of English and Education
Marsh D., Mehisto P., Wolff D. & Frigols Martin M. J. (2010). European framework for CLIL teacher education: A framework for the professional development of CLIL teachers. Graz: European Centre for Modern Languages.
Martin J. R. (2009). Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education
Massler U., Stotz D. & Queisser C. (2014). Assessment instruments for primary CLIL: The conceptualisation and evaluation of test tasks. The Language Learning Journal
Maxwell-Reid C. (2014). Genre in the teaching of English in Hong Kong: A perspective from systemic functional linguistics. In Coniam D. (ed.), English language education and assessment: Recent developments in Hong Kong and the Chinese mainland. Singapore: Springer, 87–102.
Méndez García M. D. C. (2013). The intercultural turn brought about by the implementation of CLIL programmes in Spanish monolingual areas: A case study of Andalusian primary and secondary schools. The Language Learning Journal
Modiano M. (2009). EIL, native-speakerism and the failure of European ELT. In Sharifian F. (ed.), English as an international language: Perspectives and pedagogical issues. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 58–77.
Moore J. & Schleppegrell M. (2014). Using a functional linguistic metalanguage to support academic language development in the English Language Arts. Linguistics and Education
Moore P. & Lorenzo F. (2007). Adapting authentic materials for CLIL classrooms: An empirical study. Vienna English Working Papers
Morrow K. (2012). Communicative language testing. In Coombe C., Davidson P., O'Sullivan B. & Stoynoff S. (eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 140–146.
Morton T. (2013). Critically evaluating materials in CLIL. In Gray J. (ed.), Critical perspectives on language teaching materials. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 111–136.
Navés T. (2009). Effective content and language integrated learning. In Ruiz de Zarobe Y. & Catalán R. Jiménez (eds.), Content and language integrated learning: Evidence from research in Europe. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 22–40.
Nguyen H. T. M. (2011). Primary English language education policy in Vietnam: Insights from implementation. Current Issues in Language Planning
Nunan D. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia-Pacific region. TESOL Quarterly
Pastor A. M. R. (2015). The commodification of English in ‘Madrid, comunidad bilingüe’: Insights from the CLIL classroom. Language Policy
Pavón Vázquez V. & Rubio F. (2010). Teachers' concerns and uncertainties about the introduction of CLIL programmes. Porta Linguarum
Pérez-Cañado M. L. (2016). From the CLIL craze to the CLIL conundrum: Addressing the current CLIL controversy. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 9.1, 9–31.
Pérez-Cañado M. L. (2012). CLIL research in Europe: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism
Piller I. (2012). Multilingualism and social exclusion. In Martin-Jones M., Blackledge A. & Creese A. (eds.), The Routledge handbook of multilingualism. Abingdon: Routledge, 281–296.
Pladevall-Ballester E. (2015). Exploring primary school CLIL perceptions in Catalonia: Students', teachers' and parents' opinions and expectations. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism
Polias J. (ed.) (2005). Improving language and learning in public-sector schools. Hong Kong: Quality Assurance Division, Hong Kong Education and Manpower Bureau.
Polias J. (2011). English language teachers and subject teachers collaborating: Recent changes in pedagogical practices in Hong Kong. Tidsskriftet Viden Om Laesning
Polias J. & Dare B. (2006). Towards a pedagogical grammar. In Whittaker R., O'Donnell M. & McCabe A. (eds.), Language and literacy: Functional approaches. London: Continuum, 123–143.
Prapaisit de Segovia L. & Hardison D. M. (2008). Implementing education reform: EFL teachers' perspectives. ELT Journal
Pribady I. Y. (2012). The implementation of a genre based approach to teaching narrative writing. In Knox J. S. (ed.), Papers from the 39th International Systemic Functional Congress. Sydney, 57–62.
Reierstam H. (2015). Assessing language or content? A comparative study of the assessment practices in three Swedish upper secondary CLIL schools. Licenciate Thesis, University of Gothenburg, Sweden. http://hdl.handle.net/2077/40701
Richards J. (2013). Curriculum approaches in language teaching: Forward, central and backward design. RELC Journal
Rose D. (2015). New developments in genre-based literacy pedagogy. In MacArthur C. A., Graham S. & Fitzgerald J. (eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd edn.). New York: Guilford, 227–242.
Rose D. & Martin J. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. Sheffield: Equinox.
Rothery J. (1989). Learning about language. In Hasan R. & Martin J. R. (eds.), Language development: Learning language, learning culture (vol. 1). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation, 199–256.
Rothery J. (1996). Making changes: Developing an educational linguistics. In Hasan R. & Williams G. (eds.), Literacy in society. London: Longman, 86–128.
Ruiz de Zarobe Y. & Lasagabaster D. (eds.) (2010). CLIL in Spain: Implementation, results and teacher training. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Ruiz de Zarobe Y. & Lasagabaster D. (2010a). Introduction. The Emergence of CLIL in Spain: An educational challenge. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & D. Lasagabaster (eds.), ix–xvii.
Ruiz de Zarobe Y. & Lasagabaster D. (2010b). CLIL in a bilingual community: The Basque autonomous community. In Y. Ruiz de Zarobe & D. Lasagabaster (eds.), 12–25.
Savignon S. J. (2008). Communicative language teaching: Linguistic theory and classroom practice. In Savignon S. J. (ed.), Interpreting communicative language teaching: Contexts and concerns in teacher education. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1–28.
Schwab J. (1973). The practical 3: Translation into curriculum. The School Review
Schleppegrell M. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Seargeant P. (2008). Ideologies of English in Japan: The perspective of policy and pedagogy. Language Policy
Stelma J. (2009). What is communicative language teaching? In Hunston S. & Oakey D. (eds.), Introducing applied linguistics: Concepts and skills. London: Routledge, 53–59.
Sukyadi D. (2014). The teaching of English in secondary schools in Indonesia. In Spolsky B. & Sung K. (eds.), Secondary school education in Asia. London: Routledge, 123–147.
Sylvén L. K. (2013). CLIL in Sweden – why does it not work? A metaperspective on CLIL across contexts in Europe. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism
Tomlinson B. (2011). Introduction. In Tomlinson B. (ed.), Materials development in language teaching (2nd edn.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–33.
Walker E. (2010). A systemic functional contribution to planning academic genre teaching in a bilingual education context. Language Awareness
White P. R. R., Mammone G. & Caldwell D. (2015). Linguistically based inequality, multilingual education and a genre-based literacy development pedagogy: Insights from the Australian experience. Language and Education
Widodo H. P. (2016). Language policy in practice: Reframing the English language curriculum in the Indonesian secondary education sector. In Kirkpatrick R. (ed.), English language education policy in Asia. New York: Springer International Publishing, 127–151.
Yan C. & He C. (2012). Bridging the implementation gap: An ethnographic study of English teachers' implementation of the curriculum reform in China. Ethnography and Education
Zhang F. & Liu Y. (2014). A study of secondary school English teachers’ beliefs in the context of curriculum reform in China. Language Teaching Research