Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-8wtlm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-20T16:57:43.237Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Foreign–Language Syllabus Development: Some Recent Approaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2008

A. M. Shaw
A. M. Shaw
Affiliation:
British Council, Madrid
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Survey Article
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , October 1977 , pp. 217 - 233
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abbs, B., Ayton, A. & Freebairn, I. (1975). Strategies, teacher's book. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Alexander, L. G. (1976). Where do we go from here? A reconsideration of some basic assumptions affecting course design. English Language Teaching Journal, 30, 2, 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, C. (1972). A taxonomy of language teaching objectives. Audio- Visual Language Journal, 10, 3, 138–40.Google Scholar
Bloom, B. S. et al. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals, Handbook I: cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.Google Scholar
Bloom, B. S., Madaus, G. F. & Krathwohl, D. R. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Bung, K. (1973 a). The input–output relation in language behaviour. Council of Europe paper CCC/EES (73) 12. Strasbourg: mimeo.Google Scholar
Bung, K. (1973 b). The foreign language needs of waiters and hotel staff. Council of Europe paper CCC/EES (73) 16 revised. Strasbourg: mimeo.Google Scholar
Bung, K. (1973 c). The specification of objectives in a language learning system for adults. Council of Europe paper CCC/EES (73) 34. Strasbourg: mimeo.Google Scholar
Cook, V. J. (1971). Freedom and control in language teaching materials. BAAL Seminar Papers 1970, 65–73. London: mimeo.Google Scholar
Cooper, M. D. (1974). Language roles in the studyof science. ELT Documents, 74/2, 2–10.Google Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1960). English language teaching and television. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1966). Modern foreign language teaching by TV. In Vaidman, A. (ed.), Trends in language teaching. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Corder, S. P. (1973). Introducing applied linguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Coste, D., Courtillon, J., Ferenczi, F., Martins-Baltar, M. & Papo, E. (1976). Unniveau-seuil. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Council of Europe (1971 a). Symposium on goal analysis, contents definition and evaluation in modern languages at university level, at Skepparholmen/Stockholm, 10 1970, Council of Europe paper CCC/ESR/LV (71) 19. Strasbourg: mimeo.Google Scholar
Council of Europe (1971 b). Linguistic content, means of evaluation and their interaction in the teaching and learning of modern languages in adult education. Symposium at Rüschlikon, 05 1971, Council of Europe paper CCC/EES (71) 135. Strasbourg: mimeo.Google Scholar
Council of Europe (1973). Systems development in adult language learning. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Gorosch, M. (1971). Some aspects of analysis of needs, definition of contents and evaluation. Report of Symposium on goal analysis, contents definition and evaluation at university level, 4–8. Council of Europe paper CCC/ESR/LV (71) 19. Strasbourg: mimeo.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., McIntosh, A. & Strevens, P. D. (1964). The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Halsall, E. (1972). European policy and national implications for modern-language teaching. Modern Languages, 53, 4, 157–68.Google Scholar
Handscombe, R. (1969 a). Linguistics and children's interests. In Fraser, H. and O'Donnell, W. R. (eds.), Applied Linguistics and the teaching of English, 38–53. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Handscombe, R. (1969 b). The Nuffield child language survey. In Stern, H. H. (ed.), Languages and the young school child, 162–74. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkes, N. (1974). Some considerations of principle for TEFL in the European primary school. ELT Documents, 74/3, 14–21.Google Scholar
Hill, C. P. (1977). Review of van Ek (1975). ELT Journal, 31, 4, 334–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, L. A. (1967). Structural syllabuses and contextual syllabuses. In Selected articles on the teaching of English as a foreign language, 115–18. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hooper, R. (ed.) (1971). The curriculum: context, design and development. Edinburgh: The Open University Press, Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In Pride, J. B. and Holmes, J. (eds.), Sociolinguistics, 269–93. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Jakobovits, L. (1970). Foreign language learning. Rowley/Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. (1976 a). The production of functional materials and their integration with existing language-teaching programmes (with special reference to the secondary-school syllabus of Croatia, Yugoslavia). ELT Documents, 76/1, 16–25.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. (1976 b). Communicative syllabus design for written English. Paper delivered to Annual General Meeting of BAAL (09 1976).Google Scholar
Johnson, K. (1977). Functional materials production, ETD Working Papers in Methodology No. 2. London: British Council.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. & Morrow, K. E. (1975). Meeting some social language needs of overseas students. ELT Documents, 76/2, 16–25.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. & Morrow, K. E. (forthcoming) (1977). Communicate in writing, and Communicate: the English of social interaction.Google Scholar
Jones, K. & Roe, P. (1975). Designing English for science and technology (EST) programmes in academic settings for overseas students: problems and perspectives. London: British Council (mimeo).Google Scholar
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S. & Masia, B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook II: Affective domain. New York: David McKay.Google Scholar
Longman, BBC and Institut für Film und Bild (1977). Challenges. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Mackey, W. F. (1965). Language teaching analysis. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Morrow, K. E. (1976). Two approaches to the design of a communicative syllabus for spoken English. Paper delivered to the Annual General Meeting of BAAL (09 1976).Google Scholar
Munby, J. (1977). Designing a processing model for specifying communicative competence in a foreign language: a study of the relationship between communication needs and the English required for specific purposes. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Essex, Colchester.Google Scholar
Newmark, L. (1971). A minimal language teaching programme. In Pimsleur, P. and Quinn, T. (eds.), The psychology of second language learning, 11–18. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newmark, L. & Reibel, D. A. (1968). Necessity and sufficiency in language learning. IRAL, 6, 145–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, A. J. (1970). A syllabus for Vorwärts. Schools Council German Project. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Peck, A. J. (1971 a). The cultural content of FL courses. In BAAL Seminar papers 1970, 34–42.Google Scholar
Peck, A. J. (1971 b). Talking to some purpose (choosing the language-teaching points of the Nuffield/Schools Council German course). In Perren, G. E. and Trim, J. L. M. (eds.). Applications of linguistics. 363–8. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richterich, R. (1972). A model for the definition of adult language needs. Council of Europe paper CCC/EES (72) 49. Strasbourg: mimeo.Google Scholar
Richterich, R. & Marchl, H. (1970). The concept of ‘situation’ in the teaching of modern languages. Council of Europe paper CCC/EES (70) 99. Strasbourg: mimeo.Google Scholar
Rivers, W. M. (1972). Speaking in many tongues. Rowley/Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Robertson, A. S. (1971). Curriculum building. In Deighton, L. C. (ed.), International encyclopedia of education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Roe, P. (1974). Systems development in adult language learning: general introduction. ELT Documents, 74/3, 2–3.Google Scholar
Roulet, E. (1972). Théories grammaticales, descriptions et enseignement des langues. Paris: Fernand Nathan.Google Scholar
Rowlands, D. (1972). Towards FLES in Britain, Part II. Modern Language Journal, 02 1972, 80–6.Google Scholar
Schools Council Research Studies (1973). Pattern and variation in curriculum development projects. London: Schools Council/Macmillan.Google Scholar
Shaw, A. M. (1975). Approaches to a communicative syllabus in foreign language curriculum development. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Essex, Colchester.Google Scholar
Sirevag, T. (1969). Curriculum studies in modern languages. Council of Europa paper DECS/ECT (69) 3. Strasbourg: mimeo.Google Scholar
Smith, P. D. Jr. (1971). Toward a practical theory of second language instruction. Center for Curriculum Development Inc., Philadelphia/Pa.Google Scholar
Spicer, A. (1969). The Nuflield foreign language teaching materials project. In Stern, H. H. (ed.), Languages and the young school child, 148–61. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stern, H. H. (1971). Language teaching materials: the next phase. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Modern Language Center: mimeo.Google Scholar
Stern, H. H. & Weinrib, A. (1971). French-language teaching modules: a new approach to language-teaching materials. Offprint (see also Canadian Modern Language Review, 27, 3, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trim, J. L. M. (1971). The analysis of ‘language contents’ by a European unit/credit system in modern languages within the framework of continuing post-secondary adult education. In Council of Europe 1971, 17–19.Google Scholar
Trim, J. L. M. (1973 a). Draft outline of a European units/credits system for modern languages learning by adults. Council of Europe paper CCC/EES (73) 9. Strasbourg: mimeo.Google Scholar
Trim, J. L. M. (1973 b). Research and development programme for a European unit/credit system for modern language learning by adults. Progress report by Project Director, Council of Europe paper CCC/EES (73) 26. Strasbourg: mimeo.Google Scholar
Trim, J. L. M. (1976). Languages for adult learners. Survey article in Language Teaching and Linguistics: Abstracts, 9, 2, 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valette, R. M. & Disick, R. S. (1972). Modern language performance objectives and individualization. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc.Google Scholar
van, Abbé D. (1971). The interplay of matter and structure in foreign language materials for the adult learner. In Rutherford, R. W. (ed), BAAL Seminar Papers 1970, 1–14.Google Scholar
van, Ek J. A. (1972 a). Analysis of the problems involved in defining in operational terms a basic competence level (or threshold level) in foreign language learning by adults. Council of Europe paper CCC/EES (72) 17. Strasbourg: mimeo.Google Scholar
van, Ek J. A. (1972 b). Proposal for a definition of a threshold level in foreign language learning by adults. Council of Europe paper CCC/EES (72) 72. Strasbourg: mimeo.Google Scholar
van, Ek J. A. (1975 a). The threshold level. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
van, Ek J. A. (1975 b). Proposal for a threshold-level for foreign-language learning in school education. Bussum: mimeo.Google Scholar
van Ek, J. A. (1976). The threshold level for modern language learning in schools. Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. C. (1968). The teaching of English through science. In Dakin, J., Tiffen, B. & Widdowson, H. C., Language in education, 117–75. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D. A. (1972 a). Grammatical, situational and notional syllabuses. A paper presented to the 3rd International Congress of Applied Linguistics. Copenhagen: mimeo.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D. A. (1972 b). Linguistics in language teaching. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D. A. (1972 c). The linguistic and situational content of the common core in a unit-credit system. Council of Europe paper CCC/EES (72) 67. Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D. A. (1976). Notional syllabuses. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar