Skip to main content Accesibility Help

Research into practice: The influence of discourse studies on language descriptions and task design in published ELT materials

  • Alex Gilmore (a1)

Discourse studies is a vast, multidisciplinary, and rapidly expanding area of research, embracing a range of approaches including discourse analysis, corpus analysis, conversation analysis, interactional sociolinguistics, critical discourse analysis, genre analysis and multimodal discourse analysis. Each approach offers its own unique perspective on discourse, focusing variably on text, context or a range of semiotic modes. Together, they provide foreign language teachers and material designers with new insights into language, and are beginning to have an observable impact on published English Language Teaching (ELT) materials. This paper examines the ways in which the four approaches with the strongest links to the ELT profession (corpus analysis, conversation analysis, discourse analysis and genre analysis) have found their way into language learning materials, and offers some suggestions on how discourse studies may influence ELT classrooms in the future.

Hide All
Aijmer, K. (ed.) (2009). Corpora and language teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Allwright, D. & Bailey, K. (1991). Classroom: An introduction to classroom research for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Altman, R. (1990). Giving and taking advice without offense. In Scarcella, R. C., Anderson, E. J. & Krashen, S. D. (eds.), Developing communicative competence in a second language. New York: Newbury House, 9599.
Anderson, K., Maclean, J. & Lynch, T. (2004). Study speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Austin, W., Park, C. & Goble, E. (2008). From interdisciplinary to transdisciplinary research: A case study. Qualitative Health Research 18.4, 557564.
Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. London: Continuum.
Baldry, A. P. (2000) (ed.). Multimodality and multimediality in the distance learning age. London: Sage.
Bardovi-Harlig, K., Hartford, B. A. S., Mahan-Taylor, R., Morgan, M. J. & Reynolds, D. W. (1991). Developing pragmatic awareness: Closing the conversation. ELT Journal 45.1, 415.
Barraja-Rohan, A. (2011). Using conversation analysis in the second language classroom to teach interactional competence. Language Teaching Research 15.4, 479507.
Barraja-Rohan, A. & Pritchard, C. R. (1997). Beyond talk: A course in communication & conversation for intermediate adult learners. Melbourne: Western Melbourne Institute of TAFE Publishing Service.
Basturkmen, H. (2001). Descriptions of spoken language for higher level learners: The example of questioning. ELT Journal 55.1, 413.
Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Belcher, D. D. (2004). Trends in teaching English for specific purposes. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 24, 165186.
Belton, A. (1988). Lexical naturalness in native and non-native discourse. English Language Research Journal 2, 79106.
Bernsten, S. G. (2002). Using conversation analysis to evaluate pre-sequences in invitation, offer, and request dialogues in ESL textbooks. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.
Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of written discourse: A genre-based view. London: Continuum.
Bhatia, V. K., Flowerdew, J. & Jones, R. H. (eds.) (2008). Advances in discourse studies. London: Routledge.
Biber, D. (2009). Corpus-based and corpus-driven analyses of language variation and use. In Heine, B. & Narrog, H. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 159192.
Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boulton, A. (2012). Corpus consultation for ESP: A review of empirical research. In Boulton, A., Carter-Thomas, S. & Rowley-Jolivet, E. (eds.), Corpus-informed research and learning in ESP: Issues and applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 261291.
Bouton, L. F. (1996). Pragmatics and language learning. In Bouton, L. F. (ed.), Pragmatics and language learning (vol. 7), Urbana-Champaign: DEIL, University of Illinois, 120.
Bowles, H. (2006). Bridging the gap between conversation analysis and ESP – an applied study of the opening sequences of NS and NNS service telephone calls. English for Specific Purposes 25.3, 332357.
Boxer, D. & Pickering, L. (1995). Problems in the presentation of speech acts in ELT materials: The case of complaints. ELT Journal 49.1, 4458.
Bradford, B. (1988). Intonation in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brazil, D. (1985a). The communicative value of intonation in English. Birmingham: English Language Research, University of Birmingham.
Brazil, D. (1985b). Phonology: Intonation in discourse. In van Dijk, T. A. (ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis, vol. 2. London: Academic Press.
Brazil, D. (1994a). Pronunciation for advanced learners of English (student's book). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brazil, D. (1994b). Pronunciation for advanced learners of English (teacher's book). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brazil, D., Coulthard, M. & Johns, C. (1980). Discourse intonation and language teaching. London: Longman.
Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burns, A. (1998). Teaching speaking. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 18, 102123.
Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research: A guide for practitioners. Abingdon: Routledge.
Burns, A., Joyce, H. & Gollin, S. (1996). ‘I see what you mean’: Using spoken discourse in the classroom: A handbook for teachers. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University.
Burton, G. (2012). Corpora and coursebooks: Destined to be strangers forever? Corpora 7.1, 91108.
Cameron, D. (2001). Working with spoken discourse. London: SAGE.
Carrell, P. L. (1985). Facilitating ESL reading by teaching text structure. TESOL Quarterly 19.4, 727752.
Carrell, P. L. (1987). Content and formal schemata in ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly 21.3, 461481.
Carter, R. (1998). Orders of reality: CANCODE, communication, and culture. ELT Journal 52.1, 4356.
Carter, R. & Adolphs, S. (2013). Spoken corpus linguistics: From monomodal to multimodal. Abingdon: Routledge.
Carter, R. & McCarthy, M. (1997). Exploring spoken English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carter, R. & McCarthy, M. (2003). If you ever hear a native speaker, please let us know!! Plenary paper presented at the IATEFL Conference, Brighton, UK.
Carter, R. & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cauldwell, R. (2013). Phonology for listening: Teaching the stream of speech. Birmingham: Speech in Action.
Cheng, W. & Warren, M. (2007). Checking understandings: Comparing textbooks and a corpus of spoken English in Hong Kong, Language Awareness 16.3, 190207.
Clancy, P. A., Thompson, A., Suzuki, R. & Tao, H. (1996). The conversational use of reactive tokens in English, Japanese and Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics 26.3, 355387.
Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second-language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Connor, U. & Upton, T. A. (eds.) (2004). Discourse in the professions: Perspectives from corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cook, G. (1989). Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crandall, E. & Basturkmen, H. (2004). Evaluating pragmatics-focused materials. ELT Journal 58.1, 3849.
Crookes, G. (1997). What influences what and how second and foreign language teachers teach? The Modern Language Journal 81.1, 6779.
Cullen, R. & Kuo, I. (2007). ‘Spoken grammar and ELT materials: a missing link?TESOL Quarterly 41.2, 361386.
Cunningham, S. & Moor, P. (1998). Cutting edge (Intermediate). Harlow, Essex: Addison Wesley Longman.
Curl, T. S. & Drew, P. (2008). Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting. Research on Language & Social Interaction 41.2, 129153.
De Beaugrande, R. (1980). Text, discourse and process: Toward a multidisciplinary science of texts. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Also available at:
Dörnyei, Z. & Thurrell, S. (1992). Conversation and dialogues in action. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.
Eggins, S. (1990). The analysis of spoken data. Paper presented at the National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research Spoken Discourse Project Workshop. Macquarie University, Sydney, September 1990.
Eggins, S. & Slade, D. (1997). Analysing casual conversation. London: Cassell.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Harlow, Essex: Longman.
Feak, C. B. & Swales, J. M. (2010). Writing for publication: Corpus-informed materials for postdoctoral fellows in perinatology. In Harwood, N. (ed.), English language teaching materials: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 279300.
Flowerdew, J. (ed.) (1994). Academic listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Flowerdew, J. (2013). Discourse in English language education. Abingdon: Routledge.
Flowerdew, L. (2004). The argument for using English specialized corpora to understand academic and professional language. In Connor, U. & Upton, T. A. (eds.), Discourse in the professions: Perspectives from corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1133.
Flowerdew, L. (2008). Corpora and context in professional writing. In Bhatia, V. K., Flowerdew, J. & Jones, R. H. (eds.), Advances in discourse studies, London: Routledge, 115127.
Gabrielatos, C. (2006). Corpus-based evaluation of pedagogical materials If-conditionals in ELT coursebooks and the BNC. Paper presented at the 7th Teaching and Language Corpora Conference, Paris, France, 1–4 July, 2006. Accessed 26 March 2013 at:
Gairns, R. & Redman, S. (2006–2010). Natural English (Elementary – Upper Intermediate). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gilmore, A. (2004). A comparison of textbook and authentic interactions. ELT Journal 58.4, 363374.
Gilmore, A. (2007a). Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching 40.2, 97118.
Gilmore, A. (2007b). Getting real in the language classroom: Developing Japanese students’ communicative competence with authentic materials. Ph.D. thesis, Nottingham University, UK.
Gilmore, A. (2009a). The times they are a-changin’: Strategies for exploiting authentic materials in the language classroom. In Rilling, S. & Dantas-Whitney, M. (eds.), TESOL classroom practice series: Authenticity in adult classrooms and beyond. Alexandria, Virginia: TESOL Publications, 155168.
Gilmore, A. (2009b). Using on-line corpora to develop students’ writing skills. English Language Teaching Journal 63.4, 363372.
Gilmore, A. (2010). ‘Catching words: Exploiting film discourse in the foreign language classroom’. In Mishan, F. & Chambers, A. (eds.), Perspectives on language learning materials development. Oxford: Peter Lang AG.
Gilmore, A. (2011). ‘I prefer not text’: Developing Japanese learners’ communicative competence with authentic materials. Language Learning 61.3, 786819.
Gollin, J. (1998). Deductive vs. inductive language learning. ELT Journal 52.1, 8889.
Gouverneur, C. (2008). The phraseological patterns of high-frequency verbs in advanced English for general purposes. In Meunier, F. & Granger, S. (eds.), Phraseology in foreign language learning and teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 223243.
Grant, L. & Starks, D. (2001). Screening appropriate teaching materials: Closing from textbooks and television soap operas. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 39, 3950.
Green, G. (1995). The right tool for the job: Techniques for analysis of natural language use. In Bouton, L. F. (ed.), Pragmatics and language learning (Monograph series 6). Urbana: Division of English as an International Language, University of Illinois, 118.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press.
Groom, N. (2009). Introducing corpora into the language classroom. The Language Teacher 33.7, 2628.
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Hamp-Lyons, L. & Heasley, B. (2006). Study writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hanamura, N. (1998). Teaching telephone closings in Japanese: A comparison between textbook materials and actual conversation. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics (Supplement 15), 2956.
Handford, M. (2010). The language of business meetings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Handford, M., Lisboa, M., Koester, A. & Pitt, A. (2011). Business advantage (Upper-intermediate). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harris, Z. S. (1952). Discourse analysis. Language 28.1, 130.
Hatch, E. (1992). Discourse and language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Henry, A. & Roseberry, R. L. (1998). An evaluation of a genre-based approach to the teaching of EAP/ESP writing. TESOL Quarterly 32.1, 147156.
Hewings, M. (2007). English pronunciation in use (advanced). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hidalgo, A. C., Hall, D. & Jacobs, G. M. (eds.) (1995). Getting started: Materials writers on materials writing. Singapore: SEAMEO Language Centre.
Holmes, J. (1988). Doubt and certainty in ESL textbooks. Applied Linguistics 9.1, 2144.
Howatt, A. P. R. (1984). A history of English language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hughes, R. & McCarthy, M. (1998). From sentence to discourse: Discourse grammar and English language teaching. TESOL Quarterly 32.2, 263287.
Hutchby, I. & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Huth, T. & Taleghani-Nikazm, C. (2006). How can insights from conversation analysis be directly applied to teaching L2 pragmatics? Language Teaching Research 10.1, 5379.
Hyland, K. (2002). Genre: Language, context and literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 22, 113135.
Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K. (2008). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 27, 421.
Hyland, K. (2009). Academic discourse. London: Continuum.
Hyon, S. (1996). Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly 30.4, 693722.
Iedema, R. (2003). Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication 2.1, 2957.
Johns, T. (1991). Should you be persuaded – Two samples of data-driven learning materials. In Johns, T. & King, P. (eds.), Classroom concordancing. ELR Journal 4, 116.
Jones, R. (2012). Discourse analysis: A resource book for students. London: Routledge.
Kay, S., Jones, V. & Hird, J. (2001). Inside out (Intermediate). Oxford: Macmillan Education.
Koprowski, M. (2005). Investigating the usefulness of lexical phrases in contemporary coursebooks. ELT Journal 59.4, 322332.
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London & New York: Routledge.
Kress, G. & van, T. Leeuwen (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Abingdon: Routledge.
Kučera, H. & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence: Brown University Press.
Lam, P. W. Y. (2009). Discourse particles in corpus data and textbooks: The case of well. Applied Linguistics 31.2, 260281.
Lee, D. Y. W. (2008). Corpora and discourse analysis: New ways of doing old things. In Bhatia, V. K., Flowerdew, J. & Jones, R. H. (eds.), Advances in discourse studies London: Routledge, 8699.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lillis, T. & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. Abingdon: Routledge.
Littlejohn, A. P. (1992). Why are English language teaching materials the way they are? Ph.D. thesis, Lancaster University, UK.
Lynch, T. (2004). Study listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martin, J. R. & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.
McCarthy, M. (1991). Discourse analysis for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCarthy, M. (2008). Accessing and interpreting corpus information in the teacher education context. Language Teaching 41.4, 563574.
McCarthy, M. & Carter, R. (1994). Language as discourse. Harlow: Longman.
McCarthy, M. & Carter, R. (1995). Spoken grammar: What is it and how can we teach it? ELT Journal 49.3, 207218.
McCarthy, M., McCarten, J. & Sandiford, H. (2004–2006). Touchstone (Levels 1–4). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCarthy, M. & O’Dell, F. (2002). English idioms in use (intermediate). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCarthy, M. & O’Dell, F. (2010). English idioms in use (advanced). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meier, A. J. (1997). Teaching the universals of politeness. ELT Journal 51.1, 2128.
Meunier, F. & Gouverneur, C. (2007). The treatment of phraseology in ELT textbooks. Language and Computers 21, 119139.
Mindt, D. (1996) English corpus linguistics and the foreign language teaching syllabus. In Thomas, J. & Short, M. (eds.) Using corpora for language research. Harlow: Longman, 232247.
Mori, J. 2005. Why not why?: The teaching of grammar, discourse, and sociolinguistic and cross-cultural perspectives. Japanese Linguistics and Literature 39.2, 255289.
Mukherjee, J. & Rohrbach, J. (2006). Rethinking applied corpus linguistics from a language-pedagogical perspective: New departures in learner corpus research. In Ketteman, B. & Marko, G. (eds.), Planning, gluing and painting corpora: Inside the applied corpus linguist's workshop. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 205232.
Myers Scotton, C. & Bernstein, J. (1988). Natural conversations as a model for textbook dialogue. Applied Linguistics 9.4, 372384.
Nguyen, M. T. T. (2011). Learning to communicate in a globalized world: To what extent do school textbooks facilitate the development of intercultural pragmatic competence? RELC Journal 42.1, 1730.
Nguyen, H. & Ishitobi, N. (2012). Ordering fast food: Service encounters in real-life interaction and in textbook dialogs. JALT Journal 34.2, 151185.
Nolasco, R. & Arthur, L. (1987). Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.
O’Keeffe, A. & Farr, F. (2003). Using language corpora in initial teacher education: Pedagogic issues and practical applications. TESOL Quarterly 37.3, 389418.
Parise, P. (2009). Student reactions to concordance data: A task using I-D word identification.
Pearson, E. (1986). Agreement/disagreement: An example of results of discourse analysis applied to the oral English classroom. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics 74.1, 4761.
Perry, F. L. (2005). Research in applied linguistics: Becoming a discerning consumer. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Porter, D. & Roberts, J. (1981). Authentic listening activities. ELT Journal 36.1, 3747.
Prowse, P. (2011). How writers write: Testimony from authors. In Tomlinson, B. (ed.), Materials development in language teaching (2nd edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 151173.
Recski, L. J. (2006). Corpus linguistics at the service of English teachers. Literatura y lingüística 17, 303324.
Richards, J. C. (1990). The language teaching matrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C. (2006). Materials development and research: Making the connection. RELC 37.1, 526.
Riggenbach, H. (1999). Discourse analysis in the language classroom (Volume 1): The spoken language. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Römer, U. (2006). Pedagogical applications of corpora: Some reflections on the current scope and a wish list for future developments. Zeitsschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 54.2, 121134.
Rühlemann, C. (2009). Discourse presentation in EFL textbooks: A BNC-based study. Language and Computers 21, 415435.
Rundell, M. & Stock, P. (1992). The corpus revolution. Three-part article in English Today 8.2; 8.3; 8.4, 9–17; 31, 21–38; 32, 45–51.
Rundell, M. (1996). The corpus of the future, and the future of the corpus. Talk at Exeter special conference on ‘New trends in reference science’, March 1996.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50.4, 696735.
Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
Schegloff, E. A. (1986). The routine as achievement. Human Studies 9, 111151.
Schegloff, E. A. (1988). Presequences and indirection – applying speech act theory to ordinary conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 12.1, 5562.
Schegloff, E. A. (1993). Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction 26.1, 99128.
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis (vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E. A., Koshik, I., Jacoby, S. & Olsher, D. (2002). Conversation analysis and applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 22, 331.
Schegloff, E. A. & Sacks, H. (1973) Opening up closings, Semiotica 8.4, 289327.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11, 129152.
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In Robinson, P. (ed.), Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 332.
Schmidt, R. & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner. In Day, R. (ed.), Talking to learn. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 237326.
Scott, P. J. (1987). The implications of a conversation analysis approach to request sequences for English language teaching. Unpublished MA Dissertation, University of York, UK.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Seedhouse, P. (2005). Conversation analysis and language learning. Language Teaching 38.4, 165187.
Sheldon, L. E. (ed.) (1987). ELT textbooks and materials: Problems in evaluation and development. ELT Documents 126. London: Modern English Publications/The British Council.
Shortall, T. (2003). Corpus-driven grammar and the ELT syllabus. The Language Teacher 27.7, 2729.
Shortall, T. (2007). The L2 syllabus: Corpus or contrivance? Corpora 2.2, 157185.
Sinclair, J. & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Slade, D. (1986). Teaching casual conversation to adult ESL learners. Prospect 2.1, 6888.
Stubbe, M., Lane, C., Hilder, J., Vine, E., Vine, B., Marra, M., Holmes, J. & Weatherall, A. (2003). Multiple discourse analyses of a workplace interaction. Discourse Studies 5, 351388.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. & Feak, C. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Swales, J. M. & Feak, C. (2000). English in today's research world: A writing guide. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Thornbury, S. & Slade, D. (2006). Conversation: From description to pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thurston, J. & Candlin, C. (1997). Exploring academic English: A workbook for student essay writing. Sydney: NCELTR.
Toffler, A. (1970). Future shock. New York: Random House.
Tomlinson, B. (ed.) (2011). Materials development in language teaching (2nd edn). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and teaching. Language Teaching 45.2, 143179.
Ur, P. (1991). A course in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Dijk, T. A. (2007). The study of discourse: An introduction. In van Dijk, T. A. (ed.), Discourse studies (5 vols.). London: Sage, xixxlii.
van Dijk, T. A. (ed.) (2011). Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (2nd edn). London: Sage.
Vellenga, H. E. (2004). Learning pragmatics from ESL & EFL textbooks: How likely? TESL-EJ 8.2, 117.
Wajnryb, R. (1996). Death, taxes and jeopardy: Systematic omissions in EFL texts, or ‘life was never meant to be an adjacency pair’. Paper presented at the 9th Educational Conference, Sydney.
Wallace, M. J. (2004). Study skills in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, M. (1988). Language taught for meetings and language used in meetings: Is there anything in common? Applied Linguistics 9.1, 4558.
Williams, M. & Burden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Willis, J. & Willis, D. (1988). Collins Cobuild English course (Level 1). London: Collins.
Wolfson, N. (1986). Research methodology and the question of validity. TESOL Quarterly 20.4, 689699.
Wong, J. (2002). ‘Applying’ conversation analysis in applied linguistics: Evaluating dialogue in English as a second language textbooks. International Review of Applied Linguistics 40.1, 3760.
Wong, J. (2007). Answering my call: A look at telephone closings. In Bowles, H. & Seedhouse, P. (eds.), Conversation analysis and language for specific purposes. Bern: Peter Lang, 271304.
Wong, J. & Waring, H. Z. (2010). Conversation analysis and second language pedagogy: A guide for ESL/EFL teachers. New York: Routledge.
Wray, A. (2000). Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: Principle and practice. Applied Linguistics 21.4, 463489.
Young, L. (1994). University lectures – macro-structure and micro-features. In Flowerdew, J. (ed.), Academic listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 159176.
Young, R. F. (2002). Discourse approaches to oral language assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 22, 243262.
Zhang, S. (2008). The necessities, feasibilities and principles for EFL teachers to build a learner-oriented mini-corpus for practical classroom uses. Asian EFL Journal 29, 115.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Language Teaching
  • ISSN: 0261-4448
  • EISSN: 1475-3049
  • URL: /core/journals/language-teaching
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Gilmore supplementary material

 Word (33 KB)
33 KB


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed