Skip to main content
×
Home

Research Timeline: Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition

  • Hossein Nassaji (a1)
Abstract

This article provides a timeline of research on form-focused instruction (FFI). Over the past 40 years, research on the role of instruction has undergone many changes. Much of the early research concentrated on determining whether formal instruction makes any difference in the development of learner language. This question was motivated in part by a theoretical discussion in the field of cognitive psychology over the role of explicit versus implicit learning, on the one hand, and a debate in the field of second language acquisition (SLA) over the role of naturalistic exposure versus formal instruction, on the other. In the early 1980s, for example, based on the notion that the processes involved in second language (L2) learning are similar to those in first language (L1) learning, Krashen (e.g., Krashen 1981, 1982, 1985) made a distinction between learning and acquisition and claimed that an L2 should be acquired through natural exposure not learned through formal instruction. Thus, he claimed that FFI has little beneficial effect on language acquisition. This position, which has also been known as a ‘zero position’ on instruction, was also taken by a number of other researchers who argued that L1 and L2 learning follow similar processes and that what L2 learners need in order to acquire a second language is naturalistic exposure to meaning-focused communication rather than formal instruction (Dulay & Burt 1974; Felix 1981; Prabhu 1987; Schwartz 1993; Zobl 1995).

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Research Timeline: Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Research Timeline: Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Research Timeline: Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Dulay H. & Burt M. (1974). Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning 24, 3753.
Ellis R. (1985). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis R. (2001). Introduction: Investigating form-focused instruction. Language Learning 51, 146.
Felix S. (1981). The effect of formal instruction on second language acquisition. Language Learning 31, 87112.
Harley B. & Swain M. (1984). The interlanguage of immersion students and its implications for second language teaching. In Davies A., Criper C. & Howatt A. P. R. (eds.), Interlanguage. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press, 291311.
Krashen S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Krashen S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press.
Krashen S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Lapkin S., Hart D. & Swain M. (1991). Early and middle French immersion programs – French-language outcomes. Canadian Modern Language Review–Revue Canadienne Des Langues Vivantes 48, 1140.
Larsen-Freeman D. & Long M. H. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.
Norris J. M. & Ortega L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning 50, 417528.
Norris J. M. & Ortega L. (2001). Does type of instruction make a difference? Substantive findings from a meta-analytic review. Language Learning 51, 157213.
Prabhu N. S. (1987). Second language pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schmidt R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 13, 206226.
Schmidt R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in language learning. In Schmidt R. (ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press, 163.
Schmidt R. & Frota S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language. A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In Day R. (ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 237326.
Schwartz B. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15, 147163.
Sharwood Smith M. (1981). Consciousness-raising and second language acquisition theory. Applied Linguistics 2, 159168.
Swain M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some rules of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Gass S. & Madden C. (eds.), Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 235253.
Zobl H. (1995). Converging evidence for the ‘acquisition-learning’ distinction. Applied Linguistics 16, 3556.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Language Teaching
  • ISSN: 0261-4448
  • EISSN: 1475-3049
  • URL: /core/journals/language-teaching
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 71
Total number of PDF views: 1087 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1177 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.